Cargando…

Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PURPOSE: This was carried out to evaluate the benefit of a ‘fulcrum bending position’ compared with the standing position for evaluation of sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients with spondylolisthesis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: In lumba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pruttikul, Pritsanai, Maneesrisajja, Thodsaporn, Urusopon, Para, Pluemvitayaporn, Tinnakorn, Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat, Kunakornsawat, Sombat, Kittithamvongs, Piyabuth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31352726
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0299
_version_ 1783476497028218880
author Pruttikul, Pritsanai
Maneesrisajja, Thodsaporn
Urusopon, Para
Pluemvitayaporn, Tinnakorn
Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat
Kunakornsawat, Sombat
Kittithamvongs, Piyabuth
author_facet Pruttikul, Pritsanai
Maneesrisajja, Thodsaporn
Urusopon, Para
Pluemvitayaporn, Tinnakorn
Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat
Kunakornsawat, Sombat
Kittithamvongs, Piyabuth
author_sort Pruttikul, Pritsanai
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PURPOSE: This was carried out to evaluate the benefit of a ‘fulcrum bending position’ compared with the standing position for evaluation of sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients with spondylolisthesis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: In lumbar X-ray, the standing position is the most common position used in determining abnormalities in lumbar movement. Lack of standardized method is one of the pitfalls in this technique. We hypothesized that the new technique, that is, fulcrum bending position, may reveal a higher translation and rotation in spondylolisthesis patients. METHODS: The extension lumbar radiographs of 36 patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis were included in the analysis and measurement. Sagittal translation and sagittal rotation were measured in both the routine standing position and in our new technique, the fulcrum bending position, which involves taking lateral cross-table images in the supine position wherein the patient lies on a cylindrical pipe to achieve maximum passive back extension by the fulcrum principle. RESULTS: Results of the measurement of sagittal translation in both positions revealed that compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position achieved a statistically significant increase of 1.57 mm in translation of the vertebra position (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–2.61; p=0.004). The measurement of sagittal rotation in both positions revealed that when compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position achieved a statistically significant increase of 3.47° in the rotation of the vertebra (95% CI, 1.64–5.30; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For evaluation of both sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients with spondylolisthesis, compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position can achieve an increased change in magnitude. Our technique, that is, the fulcrum bending position, may offer an alternative method in the detection or exclusion of pathological mobility in patients with spondylolisthesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6894980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68949802019-12-11 Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients Pruttikul, Pritsanai Maneesrisajja, Thodsaporn Urusopon, Para Pluemvitayaporn, Tinnakorn Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat Kunakornsawat, Sombat Kittithamvongs, Piyabuth Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PURPOSE: This was carried out to evaluate the benefit of a ‘fulcrum bending position’ compared with the standing position for evaluation of sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients with spondylolisthesis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: In lumbar X-ray, the standing position is the most common position used in determining abnormalities in lumbar movement. Lack of standardized method is one of the pitfalls in this technique. We hypothesized that the new technique, that is, fulcrum bending position, may reveal a higher translation and rotation in spondylolisthesis patients. METHODS: The extension lumbar radiographs of 36 patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis were included in the analysis and measurement. Sagittal translation and sagittal rotation were measured in both the routine standing position and in our new technique, the fulcrum bending position, which involves taking lateral cross-table images in the supine position wherein the patient lies on a cylindrical pipe to achieve maximum passive back extension by the fulcrum principle. RESULTS: Results of the measurement of sagittal translation in both positions revealed that compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position achieved a statistically significant increase of 1.57 mm in translation of the vertebra position (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–2.61; p=0.004). The measurement of sagittal rotation in both positions revealed that when compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position achieved a statistically significant increase of 3.47° in the rotation of the vertebra (95% CI, 1.64–5.30; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For evaluation of both sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients with spondylolisthesis, compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position can achieve an increased change in magnitude. Our technique, that is, the fulcrum bending position, may offer an alternative method in the detection or exclusion of pathological mobility in patients with spondylolisthesis. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2019-12 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6894980/ /pubmed/31352726 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0299 Text en Copyright © 2019 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Pruttikul, Pritsanai
Maneesrisajja, Thodsaporn
Urusopon, Para
Pluemvitayaporn, Tinnakorn
Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat
Kunakornsawat, Sombat
Kittithamvongs, Piyabuth
Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients
title Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients
title_full Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients
title_fullStr Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients
title_short Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients
title_sort comparison of segmental mobility in lumbar extension radiographs between a new technique (“fulcrum bending position”) and conventional standing position in spondylolisthesis patients
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31352726
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0299
work_keys_str_mv AT pruttikulpritsanai comparisonofsegmentalmobilityinlumbarextensionradiographsbetweenanewtechniquefulcrumbendingpositionandconventionalstandingpositioninspondylolisthesispatients
AT maneesrisajjathodsaporn comparisonofsegmentalmobilityinlumbarextensionradiographsbetweenanewtechniquefulcrumbendingpositionandconventionalstandingpositioninspondylolisthesispatients
AT urusoponpara comparisonofsegmentalmobilityinlumbarextensionradiographsbetweenanewtechniquefulcrumbendingpositionandconventionalstandingpositioninspondylolisthesispatients
AT pluemvitayaporntinnakorn comparisonofsegmentalmobilityinlumbarextensionradiographsbetweenanewtechniquefulcrumbendingpositionandconventionalstandingpositioninspondylolisthesispatients
AT piyaskulkaewchaiwat comparisonofsegmentalmobilityinlumbarextensionradiographsbetweenanewtechniquefulcrumbendingpositionandconventionalstandingpositioninspondylolisthesispatients
AT kunakornsawatsombat comparisonofsegmentalmobilityinlumbarextensionradiographsbetweenanewtechniquefulcrumbendingpositionandconventionalstandingpositioninspondylolisthesispatients
AT kittithamvongspiyabuth comparisonofsegmentalmobilityinlumbarextensionradiographsbetweenanewtechniquefulcrumbendingpositionandconventionalstandingpositioninspondylolisthesispatients