Cargando…
Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PURPOSE: This was carried out to evaluate the benefit of a ‘fulcrum bending position’ compared with the standing position for evaluation of sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients with spondylolisthesis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: In lumba...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31352726 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0299 |
_version_ | 1783476497028218880 |
---|---|
author | Pruttikul, Pritsanai Maneesrisajja, Thodsaporn Urusopon, Para Pluemvitayaporn, Tinnakorn Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat Kunakornsawat, Sombat Kittithamvongs, Piyabuth |
author_facet | Pruttikul, Pritsanai Maneesrisajja, Thodsaporn Urusopon, Para Pluemvitayaporn, Tinnakorn Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat Kunakornsawat, Sombat Kittithamvongs, Piyabuth |
author_sort | Pruttikul, Pritsanai |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PURPOSE: This was carried out to evaluate the benefit of a ‘fulcrum bending position’ compared with the standing position for evaluation of sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients with spondylolisthesis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: In lumbar X-ray, the standing position is the most common position used in determining abnormalities in lumbar movement. Lack of standardized method is one of the pitfalls in this technique. We hypothesized that the new technique, that is, fulcrum bending position, may reveal a higher translation and rotation in spondylolisthesis patients. METHODS: The extension lumbar radiographs of 36 patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis were included in the analysis and measurement. Sagittal translation and sagittal rotation were measured in both the routine standing position and in our new technique, the fulcrum bending position, which involves taking lateral cross-table images in the supine position wherein the patient lies on a cylindrical pipe to achieve maximum passive back extension by the fulcrum principle. RESULTS: Results of the measurement of sagittal translation in both positions revealed that compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position achieved a statistically significant increase of 1.57 mm in translation of the vertebra position (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–2.61; p=0.004). The measurement of sagittal rotation in both positions revealed that when compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position achieved a statistically significant increase of 3.47° in the rotation of the vertebra (95% CI, 1.64–5.30; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For evaluation of both sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients with spondylolisthesis, compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position can achieve an increased change in magnitude. Our technique, that is, the fulcrum bending position, may offer an alternative method in the detection or exclusion of pathological mobility in patients with spondylolisthesis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6894980 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Korean Society of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68949802019-12-11 Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients Pruttikul, Pritsanai Maneesrisajja, Thodsaporn Urusopon, Para Pluemvitayaporn, Tinnakorn Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat Kunakornsawat, Sombat Kittithamvongs, Piyabuth Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PURPOSE: This was carried out to evaluate the benefit of a ‘fulcrum bending position’ compared with the standing position for evaluation of sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients with spondylolisthesis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: In lumbar X-ray, the standing position is the most common position used in determining abnormalities in lumbar movement. Lack of standardized method is one of the pitfalls in this technique. We hypothesized that the new technique, that is, fulcrum bending position, may reveal a higher translation and rotation in spondylolisthesis patients. METHODS: The extension lumbar radiographs of 36 patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis were included in the analysis and measurement. Sagittal translation and sagittal rotation were measured in both the routine standing position and in our new technique, the fulcrum bending position, which involves taking lateral cross-table images in the supine position wherein the patient lies on a cylindrical pipe to achieve maximum passive back extension by the fulcrum principle. RESULTS: Results of the measurement of sagittal translation in both positions revealed that compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position achieved a statistically significant increase of 1.57 mm in translation of the vertebra position (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–2.61; p=0.004). The measurement of sagittal rotation in both positions revealed that when compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position achieved a statistically significant increase of 3.47° in the rotation of the vertebra (95% CI, 1.64–5.30; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For evaluation of both sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients with spondylolisthesis, compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position can achieve an increased change in magnitude. Our technique, that is, the fulcrum bending position, may offer an alternative method in the detection or exclusion of pathological mobility in patients with spondylolisthesis. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2019-12 2019-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6894980/ /pubmed/31352726 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0299 Text en Copyright © 2019 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Pruttikul, Pritsanai Maneesrisajja, Thodsaporn Urusopon, Para Pluemvitayaporn, Tinnakorn Piyaskulkaew, Chaiwat Kunakornsawat, Sombat Kittithamvongs, Piyabuth Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients |
title | Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients |
title_full | Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients |
title_short | Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients |
title_sort | comparison of segmental mobility in lumbar extension radiographs between a new technique (“fulcrum bending position”) and conventional standing position in spondylolisthesis patients |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6894980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31352726 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0299 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pruttikulpritsanai comparisonofsegmentalmobilityinlumbarextensionradiographsbetweenanewtechniquefulcrumbendingpositionandconventionalstandingpositioninspondylolisthesispatients AT maneesrisajjathodsaporn comparisonofsegmentalmobilityinlumbarextensionradiographsbetweenanewtechniquefulcrumbendingpositionandconventionalstandingpositioninspondylolisthesispatients AT urusoponpara comparisonofsegmentalmobilityinlumbarextensionradiographsbetweenanewtechniquefulcrumbendingpositionandconventionalstandingpositioninspondylolisthesispatients AT pluemvitayaporntinnakorn comparisonofsegmentalmobilityinlumbarextensionradiographsbetweenanewtechniquefulcrumbendingpositionandconventionalstandingpositioninspondylolisthesispatients AT piyaskulkaewchaiwat comparisonofsegmentalmobilityinlumbarextensionradiographsbetweenanewtechniquefulcrumbendingpositionandconventionalstandingpositioninspondylolisthesispatients AT kunakornsawatsombat comparisonofsegmentalmobilityinlumbarextensionradiographsbetweenanewtechniquefulcrumbendingpositionandconventionalstandingpositioninspondylolisthesispatients AT kittithamvongspiyabuth comparisonofsegmentalmobilityinlumbarextensionradiographsbetweenanewtechniquefulcrumbendingpositionandconventionalstandingpositioninspondylolisthesispatients |