Cargando…

A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs

Microbial contamination of beef cattle carcases and subsequent cross-contamination during processing is inevitable and virtually impossible to prevent. The understanding of microbial contamination in the beef industry is currently limited to hypotheses based on traditional microbiological tools. Add...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Sanga, Ravensdale, Joshua, Coorey, Ranil, Dykes, Gary A., Barlow, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6895009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849891
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02747
_version_ 1783476500493762560
author Kang, Sanga
Ravensdale, Joshua
Coorey, Ranil
Dykes, Gary A.
Barlow, Robert
author_facet Kang, Sanga
Ravensdale, Joshua
Coorey, Ranil
Dykes, Gary A.
Barlow, Robert
author_sort Kang, Sanga
collection PubMed
description Microbial contamination of beef cattle carcases and subsequent cross-contamination during processing is inevitable and virtually impossible to prevent. The understanding of microbial contamination in the beef industry is currently limited to hypotheses based on traditional microbiological tools. Additionally, the complex structural and functional responses of beef cattle microbial communities to the fragmentation in the supply chain remain unknown. This study used 16S rRNA gene sequencing in combination with traditional microbiology to monitor and compare changes in the microbiota throughout slaughter in an integrated (abattoir A) and a fragmented (abattoir B) beef abattoir in Australia. Briefly, the primary difference between an integrated and a fragmented abattoir is that fragmented abattoirs receive cattle from multiple sources, whereas integrated abattoirs typically receive cattle that has been produced using the same production system and from a limited number of sources. The composition in the bacterial communities varied between the abattoirs, though the presence of the most predominant bacterial species within the microbiota at each abattoir was similar. Lactobacillales (2.4–56.2%) and Pseudomonadales (2.4–59.4%) most notably dominated hides, carcases, and the environment in abattoir B. In abattoir A, Bacteroidales (3.9–43.8%), Lactobacillales (0.0–61.9%), and Pseudomonadales (0.5–72.1%) fluctuated but generally shared the dominance over the rest. Combined results of total viable count (TVC) and 16S rRNA gene profiling indicated that an upward hide pulling system adopted by abattoir B may lead to increased transmission of hide contaminants to post-hide pull carcases. Abattoir B had 3.2 log(10)CFU/cm(2) reduction from hide to carcase, where abattoir A had 4.5 log(10)CFU/cm(2) reduction. The findings from this study indicated that common beef-associated microbiota exist in varying composition in Australian abattoirs, and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing is a powerful tool to understand in-depth movement of microbial contaminants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6895009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68950092019-12-17 A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs Kang, Sanga Ravensdale, Joshua Coorey, Ranil Dykes, Gary A. Barlow, Robert Front Microbiol Microbiology Microbial contamination of beef cattle carcases and subsequent cross-contamination during processing is inevitable and virtually impossible to prevent. The understanding of microbial contamination in the beef industry is currently limited to hypotheses based on traditional microbiological tools. Additionally, the complex structural and functional responses of beef cattle microbial communities to the fragmentation in the supply chain remain unknown. This study used 16S rRNA gene sequencing in combination with traditional microbiology to monitor and compare changes in the microbiota throughout slaughter in an integrated (abattoir A) and a fragmented (abattoir B) beef abattoir in Australia. Briefly, the primary difference between an integrated and a fragmented abattoir is that fragmented abattoirs receive cattle from multiple sources, whereas integrated abattoirs typically receive cattle that has been produced using the same production system and from a limited number of sources. The composition in the bacterial communities varied between the abattoirs, though the presence of the most predominant bacterial species within the microbiota at each abattoir was similar. Lactobacillales (2.4–56.2%) and Pseudomonadales (2.4–59.4%) most notably dominated hides, carcases, and the environment in abattoir B. In abattoir A, Bacteroidales (3.9–43.8%), Lactobacillales (0.0–61.9%), and Pseudomonadales (0.5–72.1%) fluctuated but generally shared the dominance over the rest. Combined results of total viable count (TVC) and 16S rRNA gene profiling indicated that an upward hide pulling system adopted by abattoir B may lead to increased transmission of hide contaminants to post-hide pull carcases. Abattoir B had 3.2 log(10)CFU/cm(2) reduction from hide to carcase, where abattoir A had 4.5 log(10)CFU/cm(2) reduction. The findings from this study indicated that common beef-associated microbiota exist in varying composition in Australian abattoirs, and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing is a powerful tool to understand in-depth movement of microbial contaminants. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6895009/ /pubmed/31849891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02747 Text en Copyright © 2019 Kang, Ravensdale, Coorey, Dykes and Barlow. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Kang, Sanga
Ravensdale, Joshua
Coorey, Ranil
Dykes, Gary A.
Barlow, Robert
A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs
title A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs
title_full A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs
title_fullStr A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs
title_short A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs
title_sort comparison of 16s rrna profiles through slaughter in australian export beef abattoirs
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6895009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849891
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02747
work_keys_str_mv AT kangsanga acomparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs
AT ravensdalejoshua acomparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs
AT cooreyranil acomparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs
AT dykesgarya acomparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs
AT barlowrobert acomparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs
AT kangsanga comparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs
AT ravensdalejoshua comparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs
AT cooreyranil comparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs
AT dykesgarya comparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs
AT barlowrobert comparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs