Cargando…
A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs
Microbial contamination of beef cattle carcases and subsequent cross-contamination during processing is inevitable and virtually impossible to prevent. The understanding of microbial contamination in the beef industry is currently limited to hypotheses based on traditional microbiological tools. Add...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6895009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02747 |
_version_ | 1783476500493762560 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Sanga Ravensdale, Joshua Coorey, Ranil Dykes, Gary A. Barlow, Robert |
author_facet | Kang, Sanga Ravensdale, Joshua Coorey, Ranil Dykes, Gary A. Barlow, Robert |
author_sort | Kang, Sanga |
collection | PubMed |
description | Microbial contamination of beef cattle carcases and subsequent cross-contamination during processing is inevitable and virtually impossible to prevent. The understanding of microbial contamination in the beef industry is currently limited to hypotheses based on traditional microbiological tools. Additionally, the complex structural and functional responses of beef cattle microbial communities to the fragmentation in the supply chain remain unknown. This study used 16S rRNA gene sequencing in combination with traditional microbiology to monitor and compare changes in the microbiota throughout slaughter in an integrated (abattoir A) and a fragmented (abattoir B) beef abattoir in Australia. Briefly, the primary difference between an integrated and a fragmented abattoir is that fragmented abattoirs receive cattle from multiple sources, whereas integrated abattoirs typically receive cattle that has been produced using the same production system and from a limited number of sources. The composition in the bacterial communities varied between the abattoirs, though the presence of the most predominant bacterial species within the microbiota at each abattoir was similar. Lactobacillales (2.4–56.2%) and Pseudomonadales (2.4–59.4%) most notably dominated hides, carcases, and the environment in abattoir B. In abattoir A, Bacteroidales (3.9–43.8%), Lactobacillales (0.0–61.9%), and Pseudomonadales (0.5–72.1%) fluctuated but generally shared the dominance over the rest. Combined results of total viable count (TVC) and 16S rRNA gene profiling indicated that an upward hide pulling system adopted by abattoir B may lead to increased transmission of hide contaminants to post-hide pull carcases. Abattoir B had 3.2 log(10)CFU/cm(2) reduction from hide to carcase, where abattoir A had 4.5 log(10)CFU/cm(2) reduction. The findings from this study indicated that common beef-associated microbiota exist in varying composition in Australian abattoirs, and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing is a powerful tool to understand in-depth movement of microbial contaminants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6895009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68950092019-12-17 A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs Kang, Sanga Ravensdale, Joshua Coorey, Ranil Dykes, Gary A. Barlow, Robert Front Microbiol Microbiology Microbial contamination of beef cattle carcases and subsequent cross-contamination during processing is inevitable and virtually impossible to prevent. The understanding of microbial contamination in the beef industry is currently limited to hypotheses based on traditional microbiological tools. Additionally, the complex structural and functional responses of beef cattle microbial communities to the fragmentation in the supply chain remain unknown. This study used 16S rRNA gene sequencing in combination with traditional microbiology to monitor and compare changes in the microbiota throughout slaughter in an integrated (abattoir A) and a fragmented (abattoir B) beef abattoir in Australia. Briefly, the primary difference between an integrated and a fragmented abattoir is that fragmented abattoirs receive cattle from multiple sources, whereas integrated abattoirs typically receive cattle that has been produced using the same production system and from a limited number of sources. The composition in the bacterial communities varied between the abattoirs, though the presence of the most predominant bacterial species within the microbiota at each abattoir was similar. Lactobacillales (2.4–56.2%) and Pseudomonadales (2.4–59.4%) most notably dominated hides, carcases, and the environment in abattoir B. In abattoir A, Bacteroidales (3.9–43.8%), Lactobacillales (0.0–61.9%), and Pseudomonadales (0.5–72.1%) fluctuated but generally shared the dominance over the rest. Combined results of total viable count (TVC) and 16S rRNA gene profiling indicated that an upward hide pulling system adopted by abattoir B may lead to increased transmission of hide contaminants to post-hide pull carcases. Abattoir B had 3.2 log(10)CFU/cm(2) reduction from hide to carcase, where abattoir A had 4.5 log(10)CFU/cm(2) reduction. The findings from this study indicated that common beef-associated microbiota exist in varying composition in Australian abattoirs, and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing is a powerful tool to understand in-depth movement of microbial contaminants. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6895009/ /pubmed/31849891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02747 Text en Copyright © 2019 Kang, Ravensdale, Coorey, Dykes and Barlow. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Kang, Sanga Ravensdale, Joshua Coorey, Ranil Dykes, Gary A. Barlow, Robert A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs |
title | A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs |
title_full | A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs |
title_short | A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs |
title_sort | comparison of 16s rrna profiles through slaughter in australian export beef abattoirs |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6895009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02747 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangsanga acomparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs AT ravensdalejoshua acomparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs AT cooreyranil acomparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs AT dykesgarya acomparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs AT barlowrobert acomparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs AT kangsanga comparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs AT ravensdalejoshua comparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs AT cooreyranil comparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs AT dykesgarya comparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs AT barlowrobert comparisonof16srrnaprofilesthroughslaughterinaustralianexportbeefabattoirs |