Cargando…

Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study

BACKGROUND: The Lund and Browder (LB) chart is currently the most accurate and widely used chart to calculate total body surface area affected by a burn injury. However, it is not easy to use charts to calculate burn percentages because of the difficulty in performing mathematical calculations with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murari, Arun, Singh, Kaushal Neelam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6895471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795625
http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2019.00647
_version_ 1783476580546248704
author Murari, Arun
Singh, Kaushal Neelam
author_facet Murari, Arun
Singh, Kaushal Neelam
author_sort Murari, Arun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Lund and Browder (LB) chart is currently the most accurate and widely used chart to calculate total body surface area affected by a burn injury. However, it is not easy to use charts to calculate burn percentages because of the difficulty in performing mathematical calculations with the percentages attributed to various body regions that are only partially burned. It is also cumbersome to have to perform mental calculations, especially in emergency situations. METHODS: We compared results from the LB chart with a modified Lund and Browder (MLB) chart using 10 assessors on five different burn wounds each drawn on both charts. RESULTS: Variability of results was significantly reduced using the MLB chart compared to the LB chart. CONCLUSIONS: Assessments performed using the MLB chart are less variable than those using the LB chart. Using this chart will help burn care providers rapidly, accurately, and reliably estimate burn extent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6895471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68954712019-12-30 Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study Murari, Arun Singh, Kaushal Neelam Acute Crit Care Original Article BACKGROUND: The Lund and Browder (LB) chart is currently the most accurate and widely used chart to calculate total body surface area affected by a burn injury. However, it is not easy to use charts to calculate burn percentages because of the difficulty in performing mathematical calculations with the percentages attributed to various body regions that are only partially burned. It is also cumbersome to have to perform mental calculations, especially in emergency situations. METHODS: We compared results from the LB chart with a modified Lund and Browder (MLB) chart using 10 assessors on five different burn wounds each drawn on both charts. RESULTS: Variability of results was significantly reduced using the MLB chart compared to the LB chart. CONCLUSIONS: Assessments performed using the MLB chart are less variable than those using the LB chart. Using this chart will help burn care providers rapidly, accurately, and reliably estimate burn extent. Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine 2019-11 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6895471/ /pubmed/31795625 http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2019.00647 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Murari, Arun
Singh, Kaushal Neelam
Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study
title Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study
title_full Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study
title_fullStr Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study
title_short Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study
title_sort lund and browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6895471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795625
http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2019.00647
work_keys_str_mv AT murariarun lundandbrowderchartmodifiedversusoriginalacomparativestudy
AT singhkaushalneelam lundandbrowderchartmodifiedversusoriginalacomparativestudy