Cargando…
Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study
BACKGROUND: The Lund and Browder (LB) chart is currently the most accurate and widely used chart to calculate total body surface area affected by a burn injury. However, it is not easy to use charts to calculate burn percentages because of the difficulty in performing mathematical calculations with...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6895471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795625 http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2019.00647 |
_version_ | 1783476580546248704 |
---|---|
author | Murari, Arun Singh, Kaushal Neelam |
author_facet | Murari, Arun Singh, Kaushal Neelam |
author_sort | Murari, Arun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Lund and Browder (LB) chart is currently the most accurate and widely used chart to calculate total body surface area affected by a burn injury. However, it is not easy to use charts to calculate burn percentages because of the difficulty in performing mathematical calculations with the percentages attributed to various body regions that are only partially burned. It is also cumbersome to have to perform mental calculations, especially in emergency situations. METHODS: We compared results from the LB chart with a modified Lund and Browder (MLB) chart using 10 assessors on five different burn wounds each drawn on both charts. RESULTS: Variability of results was significantly reduced using the MLB chart compared to the LB chart. CONCLUSIONS: Assessments performed using the MLB chart are less variable than those using the LB chart. Using this chart will help burn care providers rapidly, accurately, and reliably estimate burn extent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6895471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68954712019-12-30 Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study Murari, Arun Singh, Kaushal Neelam Acute Crit Care Original Article BACKGROUND: The Lund and Browder (LB) chart is currently the most accurate and widely used chart to calculate total body surface area affected by a burn injury. However, it is not easy to use charts to calculate burn percentages because of the difficulty in performing mathematical calculations with the percentages attributed to various body regions that are only partially burned. It is also cumbersome to have to perform mental calculations, especially in emergency situations. METHODS: We compared results from the LB chart with a modified Lund and Browder (MLB) chart using 10 assessors on five different burn wounds each drawn on both charts. RESULTS: Variability of results was significantly reduced using the MLB chart compared to the LB chart. CONCLUSIONS: Assessments performed using the MLB chart are less variable than those using the LB chart. Using this chart will help burn care providers rapidly, accurately, and reliably estimate burn extent. Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine 2019-11 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6895471/ /pubmed/31795625 http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2019.00647 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Murari, Arun Singh, Kaushal Neelam Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study |
title | Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study |
title_full | Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study |
title_fullStr | Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study |
title_short | Lund and Browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study |
title_sort | lund and browder chart—modified versus original: a comparative study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6895471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31795625 http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2019.00647 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murariarun lundandbrowderchartmodifiedversusoriginalacomparativestudy AT singhkaushalneelam lundandbrowderchartmodifiedversusoriginalacomparativestudy |