Cargando…

Exposure–Response Analyses of Upadacitinib Efficacy in Phase II Trials in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Basis for Phase III Dose Selection

The relationships between upadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, plasma exposures, and its efficacy (assessed by the American College of Rheumatology 20%/50%/70% responses over time) in moderate‐to‐severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were characterized using data from 574 pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohamed, Mohamed‐Eslam F., Klünder, Ben, Camp, Heidi S., Othman, Ahmed A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31194885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1543
_version_ 1783476737601961984
author Mohamed, Mohamed‐Eslam F.
Klünder, Ben
Camp, Heidi S.
Othman, Ahmed A.
author_facet Mohamed, Mohamed‐Eslam F.
Klünder, Ben
Camp, Heidi S.
Othman, Ahmed A.
author_sort Mohamed, Mohamed‐Eslam F.
collection PubMed
description The relationships between upadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, plasma exposures, and its efficacy (assessed by the American College of Rheumatology 20%/50%/70% responses over time) in moderate‐to‐severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were characterized using data from 574 patients, on background methotrexate and inadequate response to methotrexate or anti‐TNF therapy, from two phase II trials conducted with twice‐daily dosing of an immediate‐release formulation. The developed time‐continuous Markov models were used to simulate efficacy of once‐daily (q.d.). regimens of upadacitinib extended‐release incorporating sources of uncertainty. Upadacitinib plasma concentrations associated with 15 and 30 mg extended‐release q.d. doses were predicted to achieve that plateau of response across RA subpopulations. Results from these analyses provided the rationale that supported selection and de‐risked evaluation of upadacitinib extended‐release doses for the first time in >4,000 patients in five large phase III trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6896251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68962512019-12-16 Exposure–Response Analyses of Upadacitinib Efficacy in Phase II Trials in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Basis for Phase III Dose Selection Mohamed, Mohamed‐Eslam F. Klünder, Ben Camp, Heidi S. Othman, Ahmed A. Clin Pharmacol Ther Research The relationships between upadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, plasma exposures, and its efficacy (assessed by the American College of Rheumatology 20%/50%/70% responses over time) in moderate‐to‐severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were characterized using data from 574 patients, on background methotrexate and inadequate response to methotrexate or anti‐TNF therapy, from two phase II trials conducted with twice‐daily dosing of an immediate‐release formulation. The developed time‐continuous Markov models were used to simulate efficacy of once‐daily (q.d.). regimens of upadacitinib extended‐release incorporating sources of uncertainty. Upadacitinib plasma concentrations associated with 15 and 30 mg extended‐release q.d. doses were predicted to achieve that plateau of response across RA subpopulations. Results from these analyses provided the rationale that supported selection and de‐risked evaluation of upadacitinib extended‐release doses for the first time in >4,000 patients in five large phase III trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-23 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6896251/ /pubmed/31194885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1543 Text en © 2019 AbbVie Inc. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research
Mohamed, Mohamed‐Eslam F.
Klünder, Ben
Camp, Heidi S.
Othman, Ahmed A.
Exposure–Response Analyses of Upadacitinib Efficacy in Phase II Trials in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Basis for Phase III Dose Selection
title Exposure–Response Analyses of Upadacitinib Efficacy in Phase II Trials in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Basis for Phase III Dose Selection
title_full Exposure–Response Analyses of Upadacitinib Efficacy in Phase II Trials in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Basis for Phase III Dose Selection
title_fullStr Exposure–Response Analyses of Upadacitinib Efficacy in Phase II Trials in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Basis for Phase III Dose Selection
title_full_unstemmed Exposure–Response Analyses of Upadacitinib Efficacy in Phase II Trials in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Basis for Phase III Dose Selection
title_short Exposure–Response Analyses of Upadacitinib Efficacy in Phase II Trials in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Basis for Phase III Dose Selection
title_sort exposure–response analyses of upadacitinib efficacy in phase ii trials in rheumatoid arthritis and basis for phase iii dose selection
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31194885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1543
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedmohamedeslamf exposureresponseanalysesofupadacitinibefficacyinphaseiitrialsinrheumatoidarthritisandbasisforphaseiiidoseselection
AT klunderben exposureresponseanalysesofupadacitinibefficacyinphaseiitrialsinrheumatoidarthritisandbasisforphaseiiidoseselection
AT campheidis exposureresponseanalysesofupadacitinibefficacyinphaseiitrialsinrheumatoidarthritisandbasisforphaseiiidoseselection
AT othmanahmeda exposureresponseanalysesofupadacitinibefficacyinphaseiitrialsinrheumatoidarthritisandbasisforphaseiiidoseselection