Outcomes and limitations: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy

One of the major roles of interventional EUS is biliary decompression as an alternative to ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Among EUS-guided biliary drainage, EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with transmural stenting (EUS-HGS) may be the most promising procedure since this procedure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paik, Woo Hyun, Park, Do Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Review Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31897379
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_51_19
_version_ 1783476776837578752
author Paik, Woo Hyun
Park, Do Hyun
author_facet Paik, Woo Hyun
Park, Do Hyun
author_sort Paik, Woo Hyun
collection PubMed
description One of the major roles of interventional EUS is biliary decompression as an alternative to ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Among EUS-guided biliary drainage, EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with transmural stenting (EUS-HGS) may be the most promising procedure since this procedure can overcome the limitation of ERCP. However, EUS-HGS has disadvantages, and the safety issue is still not resolved. In this review, the clinical outcomes and limitations of EUS-HGS will be discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6896431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68964312020-01-02 Outcomes and limitations: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy Paik, Woo Hyun Park, Do Hyun Endosc Ultrasound Review Article One of the major roles of interventional EUS is biliary decompression as an alternative to ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Among EUS-guided biliary drainage, EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with transmural stenting (EUS-HGS) may be the most promising procedure since this procedure can overcome the limitation of ERCP. However, EUS-HGS has disadvantages, and the safety issue is still not resolved. In this review, the clinical outcomes and limitations of EUS-HGS will be discussed. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6896431/ /pubmed/31897379 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_51_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Spring Media Publishing Co. Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Paik, Woo Hyun
Park, Do Hyun
Outcomes and limitations: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy
title Outcomes and limitations: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy
title_full Outcomes and limitations: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy
title_fullStr Outcomes and limitations: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes and limitations: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy
title_short Outcomes and limitations: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy
title_sort outcomes and limitations: eus-guided hepaticogastrostomy
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31897379
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_51_19
work_keys_str_mv AT paikwoohyun outcomesandlimitationseusguidedhepaticogastrostomy
AT parkdohyun outcomesandlimitationseusguidedhepaticogastrostomy

Ejemplares similares