Cargando…

Coaching in undergraduate medical education: a national survey

Background: Evidence to support coaching in medical education has grown over the past decade leading educators to search for resources to aid the development of their own coaching programs. A sample of medical schools in the USA were surveyed to describe coaching programs to assist other institution...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolff, Margaret, Hammoud, Maya, Santen, Sally, Deiorio, Nicole, Fix, Megan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31793843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1699765
_version_ 1783476791188389888
author Wolff, Margaret
Hammoud, Maya
Santen, Sally
Deiorio, Nicole
Fix, Megan
author_facet Wolff, Margaret
Hammoud, Maya
Santen, Sally
Deiorio, Nicole
Fix, Megan
author_sort Wolff, Margaret
collection PubMed
description Background: Evidence to support coaching in medical education has grown over the past decade leading educators to search for resources to aid the development of their own coaching programs. A sample of medical schools in the USA were surveyed to describe coaching programs to assist other institutions in the development and implementation of programs. Methods: Participants representing 32 medical schools attending a coaching conference in October 2018 were surveyed via email regarding their undergraduate medical education (UME) coaching programs. The 19-item instrument contained questions on program demographics, program characteristics, coach characteristics, coach training and coach assessment and program evaluation. Results: The response rate was 100% (32/32 programs). Nearly all respondents had a coaching program (53%, 17/32) or were developing one (44%, 14/32) with the majority being implemented in the past five years (82%, 14/17). Professional identity formation (80%, 20/25), professionalism (76%, 19/25), and academic performance (76%, 19/25) were the most commonly identified programmatic goals. The majority of coaches (64%, 16/25) received between 5-25% full time equivalent effort to support their role. Coaches did not formally assess students in any domain at most programs (84%, 21/25) or directly observe their students clinically (76%, 19/25). The majority of programs had formal coach training (88%, 22/25). Conclusion: These results demonstrate that coaching is being used to improve performance, professionalism, and professional identity formation in UME. This sample of coaching programs informs the discussion of coaching in medical education as educators strive to implement effective coaching programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6896497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68964972020-01-01 Coaching in undergraduate medical education: a national survey Wolff, Margaret Hammoud, Maya Santen, Sally Deiorio, Nicole Fix, Megan Med Educ Online Article Background: Evidence to support coaching in medical education has grown over the past decade leading educators to search for resources to aid the development of their own coaching programs. A sample of medical schools in the USA were surveyed to describe coaching programs to assist other institutions in the development and implementation of programs. Methods: Participants representing 32 medical schools attending a coaching conference in October 2018 were surveyed via email regarding their undergraduate medical education (UME) coaching programs. The 19-item instrument contained questions on program demographics, program characteristics, coach characteristics, coach training and coach assessment and program evaluation. Results: The response rate was 100% (32/32 programs). Nearly all respondents had a coaching program (53%, 17/32) or were developing one (44%, 14/32) with the majority being implemented in the past five years (82%, 14/17). Professional identity formation (80%, 20/25), professionalism (76%, 19/25), and academic performance (76%, 19/25) were the most commonly identified programmatic goals. The majority of coaches (64%, 16/25) received between 5-25% full time equivalent effort to support their role. Coaches did not formally assess students in any domain at most programs (84%, 21/25) or directly observe their students clinically (76%, 19/25). The majority of programs had formal coach training (88%, 22/25). Conclusion: These results demonstrate that coaching is being used to improve performance, professionalism, and professional identity formation in UME. This sample of coaching programs informs the discussion of coaching in medical education as educators strive to implement effective coaching programs. Taylor & Francis 2019-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6896497/ /pubmed/31793843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1699765 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Wolff, Margaret
Hammoud, Maya
Santen, Sally
Deiorio, Nicole
Fix, Megan
Coaching in undergraduate medical education: a national survey
title Coaching in undergraduate medical education: a national survey
title_full Coaching in undergraduate medical education: a national survey
title_fullStr Coaching in undergraduate medical education: a national survey
title_full_unstemmed Coaching in undergraduate medical education: a national survey
title_short Coaching in undergraduate medical education: a national survey
title_sort coaching in undergraduate medical education: a national survey
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31793843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1699765
work_keys_str_mv AT wolffmargaret coachinginundergraduatemedicaleducationanationalsurvey
AT hammoudmaya coachinginundergraduatemedicaleducationanationalsurvey
AT santensally coachinginundergraduatemedicaleducationanationalsurvey
AT deiorionicole coachinginundergraduatemedicaleducationanationalsurvey
AT fixmegan coachinginundergraduatemedicaleducationanationalsurvey