Cargando…

Phase-Dependent Response to Afferent Stimulation During Fictive Locomotion: A Computational Modeling Study

Central pattern generators (CPGs) in the spinal cord generate rhythmic neural activity and control locomotion in vertebrates. These CPGs operate under the control of sensory feedback that affects the generated locomotor pattern and adapt it to the animal's biomechanics and environment. Studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujiki, Soichiro, Aoi, Shinya, Tsuchiya, Kazuo, Danner, Simon M., Rybak, Ilya A., Yanagihara, Dai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01288
_version_ 1783476794321534976
author Fujiki, Soichiro
Aoi, Shinya
Tsuchiya, Kazuo
Danner, Simon M.
Rybak, Ilya A.
Yanagihara, Dai
author_facet Fujiki, Soichiro
Aoi, Shinya
Tsuchiya, Kazuo
Danner, Simon M.
Rybak, Ilya A.
Yanagihara, Dai
author_sort Fujiki, Soichiro
collection PubMed
description Central pattern generators (CPGs) in the spinal cord generate rhythmic neural activity and control locomotion in vertebrates. These CPGs operate under the control of sensory feedback that affects the generated locomotor pattern and adapt it to the animal's biomechanics and environment. Studies of the effects of afferent stimulation on fictive locomotion in immobilized cats have shown that brief stimulation of peripheral nerves can reset the ongoing locomotor rhythm. Depending on the phase of stimulation and the stimulated nerve, the applied stimulation can either shorten or prolong the current locomotor phase and the locomotor cycle. Here, we used a mathematical model of a half-center CPG to investigate the phase-dependent effects of brief stimulation applied to CPG on the CPG-generated locomotor oscillations. The CPG in the model consisted of two half-centers mutually inhibiting each other. The rhythmic activity in each half-center was based on a slowly inactivating, persistent sodium current. Brief stimulation was applied to CPG half-centers in different phases of the locomotor cycle to produce phase-dependent changes in CPG activity. The model reproduced several results from experiments on the effect of afferent stimulation of fictive locomotion in cats. The mechanisms of locomotor rhythm resetting under different conditions were analyzed using dynamic systems theory methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6896512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68965122019-12-17 Phase-Dependent Response to Afferent Stimulation During Fictive Locomotion: A Computational Modeling Study Fujiki, Soichiro Aoi, Shinya Tsuchiya, Kazuo Danner, Simon M. Rybak, Ilya A. Yanagihara, Dai Front Neurosci Neuroscience Central pattern generators (CPGs) in the spinal cord generate rhythmic neural activity and control locomotion in vertebrates. These CPGs operate under the control of sensory feedback that affects the generated locomotor pattern and adapt it to the animal's biomechanics and environment. Studies of the effects of afferent stimulation on fictive locomotion in immobilized cats have shown that brief stimulation of peripheral nerves can reset the ongoing locomotor rhythm. Depending on the phase of stimulation and the stimulated nerve, the applied stimulation can either shorten or prolong the current locomotor phase and the locomotor cycle. Here, we used a mathematical model of a half-center CPG to investigate the phase-dependent effects of brief stimulation applied to CPG on the CPG-generated locomotor oscillations. The CPG in the model consisted of two half-centers mutually inhibiting each other. The rhythmic activity in each half-center was based on a slowly inactivating, persistent sodium current. Brief stimulation was applied to CPG half-centers in different phases of the locomotor cycle to produce phase-dependent changes in CPG activity. The model reproduced several results from experiments on the effect of afferent stimulation of fictive locomotion in cats. The mechanisms of locomotor rhythm resetting under different conditions were analyzed using dynamic systems theory methods. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6896512/ /pubmed/31849596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01288 Text en Copyright © 2019 Fujiki, Aoi, Tsuchiya, Danner, Rybak and Yanagihara. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Fujiki, Soichiro
Aoi, Shinya
Tsuchiya, Kazuo
Danner, Simon M.
Rybak, Ilya A.
Yanagihara, Dai
Phase-Dependent Response to Afferent Stimulation During Fictive Locomotion: A Computational Modeling Study
title Phase-Dependent Response to Afferent Stimulation During Fictive Locomotion: A Computational Modeling Study
title_full Phase-Dependent Response to Afferent Stimulation During Fictive Locomotion: A Computational Modeling Study
title_fullStr Phase-Dependent Response to Afferent Stimulation During Fictive Locomotion: A Computational Modeling Study
title_full_unstemmed Phase-Dependent Response to Afferent Stimulation During Fictive Locomotion: A Computational Modeling Study
title_short Phase-Dependent Response to Afferent Stimulation During Fictive Locomotion: A Computational Modeling Study
title_sort phase-dependent response to afferent stimulation during fictive locomotion: a computational modeling study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01288
work_keys_str_mv AT fujikisoichiro phasedependentresponsetoafferentstimulationduringfictivelocomotionacomputationalmodelingstudy
AT aoishinya phasedependentresponsetoafferentstimulationduringfictivelocomotionacomputationalmodelingstudy
AT tsuchiyakazuo phasedependentresponsetoafferentstimulationduringfictivelocomotionacomputationalmodelingstudy
AT dannersimonm phasedependentresponsetoafferentstimulationduringfictivelocomotionacomputationalmodelingstudy
AT rybakilyaa phasedependentresponsetoafferentstimulationduringfictivelocomotionacomputationalmodelingstudy
AT yanagiharadai phasedependentresponsetoafferentstimulationduringfictivelocomotionacomputationalmodelingstudy