Cargando…

Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol

BACKGROUND: Mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) experience profound communication impairment, placing them at risk for poor physical and psychological outcomes. Patient communication strategies such as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and voice restorati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Istanboulian, Laura, Rose, Louise, Yunusova, Yana, Gorospe, Franklin, Dale, Craig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31810494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1232-0
_version_ 1783476829788569600
author Istanboulian, Laura
Rose, Louise
Yunusova, Yana
Gorospe, Franklin
Dale, Craig
author_facet Istanboulian, Laura
Rose, Louise
Yunusova, Yana
Gorospe, Franklin
Dale, Craig
author_sort Istanboulian, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) experience profound communication impairment, placing them at risk for poor physical and psychological outcomes. Patient communication strategies such as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and voice restorative devices are recommended to facilitate communication. These strategies, however, are inconsistently adopted in ICU practice signaling utilization barriers. Our objective is to map and synthesize the current evidence-base for stakeholder-reported barriers and facilitators to patient communication strategy utilization for adults with an advanced airway in the ICU. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use Arskey and O’Malley’s recommended methods to conduct a scoping review using a rapid review framework to streamline the process. A single reviewer will conduct a search and an initial screen of titles and abstracts from five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], and PsychInfo) from 1990 to present to identify English language peer-reviewed studies. Subsequently, two reviewers will independently screen a shorter list of studies for inclusion. We will also search the reference lists of eligible studies. Two reviewers will independently extract study characteristics, communication strategy, and stakeholder reported barriers and facilitators. We will code and categorize the extracted barriers and facilitators according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), an integrative framework of behavior change. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this will be the first scoping review to map and synthesize reported barriers and facilitators to communication strategy utilization in the adult ICU using a theoretical framework. The results of this scoping review will help to identify trends and gaps in the current evidence-base and support recommendations for improving patient-centered practice, policy, and research related to successfully establishing ICU patient communication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6896663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68966632019-12-11 Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol Istanboulian, Laura Rose, Louise Yunusova, Yana Gorospe, Franklin Dale, Craig Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) experience profound communication impairment, placing them at risk for poor physical and psychological outcomes. Patient communication strategies such as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and voice restorative devices are recommended to facilitate communication. These strategies, however, are inconsistently adopted in ICU practice signaling utilization barriers. Our objective is to map and synthesize the current evidence-base for stakeholder-reported barriers and facilitators to patient communication strategy utilization for adults with an advanced airway in the ICU. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use Arskey and O’Malley’s recommended methods to conduct a scoping review using a rapid review framework to streamline the process. A single reviewer will conduct a search and an initial screen of titles and abstracts from five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], and PsychInfo) from 1990 to present to identify English language peer-reviewed studies. Subsequently, two reviewers will independently screen a shorter list of studies for inclusion. We will also search the reference lists of eligible studies. Two reviewers will independently extract study characteristics, communication strategy, and stakeholder reported barriers and facilitators. We will code and categorize the extracted barriers and facilitators according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), an integrative framework of behavior change. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this will be the first scoping review to map and synthesize reported barriers and facilitators to communication strategy utilization in the adult ICU using a theoretical framework. The results of this scoping review will help to identify trends and gaps in the current evidence-base and support recommendations for improving patient-centered practice, policy, and research related to successfully establishing ICU patient communication. BioMed Central 2019-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6896663/ /pubmed/31810494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1232-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Istanboulian, Laura
Rose, Louise
Yunusova, Yana
Gorospe, Franklin
Dale, Craig
Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol
title Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol
title_full Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol
title_short Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol
title_sort barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31810494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1232-0
work_keys_str_mv AT istanboulianlaura barrierstoandfacilitatorsforuseofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationandvoicerestorativedevicesintheadultintensivecareunitascopingreviewprotocol
AT roselouise barrierstoandfacilitatorsforuseofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationandvoicerestorativedevicesintheadultintensivecareunitascopingreviewprotocol
AT yunusovayana barrierstoandfacilitatorsforuseofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationandvoicerestorativedevicesintheadultintensivecareunitascopingreviewprotocol
AT gorospefranklin barrierstoandfacilitatorsforuseofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationandvoicerestorativedevicesintheadultintensivecareunitascopingreviewprotocol
AT dalecraig barrierstoandfacilitatorsforuseofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationandvoicerestorativedevicesintheadultintensivecareunitascopingreviewprotocol