Cargando…
Usefulness of combined screening methods for rapid detection of falsified and/or substandard medicines in the absence of a confirmatory method
BACKGROUND: The influx of substandard and falsified medicines is a global public health challenge and its rapid detection is a key solution to the menace. This study used three screening methods and one confirmatory method for the quality assessment of 25 batches of artemether/lumefantrine dosage fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31805937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-3045-y |
_version_ | 1783476835950002176 |
---|---|
author | Opuni, Kwabena Frimpong-Manso Nettey, Henry Larbi, Marvin Adjei Amartey, Salome Naa Amerley Nti, Gifty Dzidonu, Abraham Owusu-Danso, Patrick Owusu, Nicholas Amoah Nyarko, Alexander Kwadwo |
author_facet | Opuni, Kwabena Frimpong-Manso Nettey, Henry Larbi, Marvin Adjei Amartey, Salome Naa Amerley Nti, Gifty Dzidonu, Abraham Owusu-Danso, Patrick Owusu, Nicholas Amoah Nyarko, Alexander Kwadwo |
author_sort | Opuni, Kwabena Frimpong-Manso |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The influx of substandard and falsified medicines is a global public health challenge and its rapid detection is a key solution to the menace. This study used three screening methods and one confirmatory method for the quality assessment of 25 batches of artemether/lumefantrine dosage forms from the Ghanaian market to test that combined screening methods only can rapidly detect substandard and/or falsified medicines in areas where confirmatory methods may not be available. METHODS: The quality of artemether/lumefantrine tablet products obtained from pharmacies and licensed chemical seller shops within the Accra metropolis in Ghana were analysed using three screening methods (GPHF Minilab, Colorimetry and Counterfeit Drug Indicator) and one confirmatory method (high-performance liquid chromatography). RESULTS: The results showed that 18/25 batches of the artemether/lumefantrine samples passed using the combined screening and confirmatory methods and 5/25 batches of the artemether/lumefantrine samples failed using the combined screening and confirmatory methods. However, 1/25 batch of the artemether/lumefantrine samples failed using the combined screening methods but passed using the confirmatory method. Also, 1/25 batch of the artemether/lumefantrine samples passed using the combined screening methods but failed using the confirmatory method. This notwithstanding, the combined screening methods and the confirmatory method provided equivalent quality assessment profiles for 23/25 (92%) batches of the artemether/lumefantrine tablet products. Out of the 6 samples that failed the confirmatory test, 1/6, 2/6, and 3/6 failed on the high (> 110%), low (< 90%), and no active ingredient (0%), respectively. The sensitivity of Minilab, colorimetric, CoDI, and the combined screening methods at 95% confidence level were 0.5 ± 0.57, 0.83 ± 0.33, 0.75 ± 0.49, and 0.83 ± 0.33, respectively. Also, the specificity of Minilab, colorimetric, CoDI, and the combined screening methods at 95% confidence level were 1.00, 0.95 ± 0.10, 1.00, and 0.95 ± 0.10, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combined screening methods may be used for rapid detection of falsified and/or substandard medicines without using a confirmatory method. However, additional research on the best combinations of screening devices/methods to rapidly detect the quality of medicines is recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6896689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68966892019-12-11 Usefulness of combined screening methods for rapid detection of falsified and/or substandard medicines in the absence of a confirmatory method Opuni, Kwabena Frimpong-Manso Nettey, Henry Larbi, Marvin Adjei Amartey, Salome Naa Amerley Nti, Gifty Dzidonu, Abraham Owusu-Danso, Patrick Owusu, Nicholas Amoah Nyarko, Alexander Kwadwo Malar J Research BACKGROUND: The influx of substandard and falsified medicines is a global public health challenge and its rapid detection is a key solution to the menace. This study used three screening methods and one confirmatory method for the quality assessment of 25 batches of artemether/lumefantrine dosage forms from the Ghanaian market to test that combined screening methods only can rapidly detect substandard and/or falsified medicines in areas where confirmatory methods may not be available. METHODS: The quality of artemether/lumefantrine tablet products obtained from pharmacies and licensed chemical seller shops within the Accra metropolis in Ghana were analysed using three screening methods (GPHF Minilab, Colorimetry and Counterfeit Drug Indicator) and one confirmatory method (high-performance liquid chromatography). RESULTS: The results showed that 18/25 batches of the artemether/lumefantrine samples passed using the combined screening and confirmatory methods and 5/25 batches of the artemether/lumefantrine samples failed using the combined screening and confirmatory methods. However, 1/25 batch of the artemether/lumefantrine samples failed using the combined screening methods but passed using the confirmatory method. Also, 1/25 batch of the artemether/lumefantrine samples passed using the combined screening methods but failed using the confirmatory method. This notwithstanding, the combined screening methods and the confirmatory method provided equivalent quality assessment profiles for 23/25 (92%) batches of the artemether/lumefantrine tablet products. Out of the 6 samples that failed the confirmatory test, 1/6, 2/6, and 3/6 failed on the high (> 110%), low (< 90%), and no active ingredient (0%), respectively. The sensitivity of Minilab, colorimetric, CoDI, and the combined screening methods at 95% confidence level were 0.5 ± 0.57, 0.83 ± 0.33, 0.75 ± 0.49, and 0.83 ± 0.33, respectively. Also, the specificity of Minilab, colorimetric, CoDI, and the combined screening methods at 95% confidence level were 1.00, 0.95 ± 0.10, 1.00, and 0.95 ± 0.10, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combined screening methods may be used for rapid detection of falsified and/or substandard medicines without using a confirmatory method. However, additional research on the best combinations of screening devices/methods to rapidly detect the quality of medicines is recommended. BioMed Central 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6896689/ /pubmed/31805937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-3045-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Opuni, Kwabena Frimpong-Manso Nettey, Henry Larbi, Marvin Adjei Amartey, Salome Naa Amerley Nti, Gifty Dzidonu, Abraham Owusu-Danso, Patrick Owusu, Nicholas Amoah Nyarko, Alexander Kwadwo Usefulness of combined screening methods for rapid detection of falsified and/or substandard medicines in the absence of a confirmatory method |
title | Usefulness of combined screening methods for rapid detection of falsified and/or substandard medicines in the absence of a confirmatory method |
title_full | Usefulness of combined screening methods for rapid detection of falsified and/or substandard medicines in the absence of a confirmatory method |
title_fullStr | Usefulness of combined screening methods for rapid detection of falsified and/or substandard medicines in the absence of a confirmatory method |
title_full_unstemmed | Usefulness of combined screening methods for rapid detection of falsified and/or substandard medicines in the absence of a confirmatory method |
title_short | Usefulness of combined screening methods for rapid detection of falsified and/or substandard medicines in the absence of a confirmatory method |
title_sort | usefulness of combined screening methods for rapid detection of falsified and/or substandard medicines in the absence of a confirmatory method |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31805937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-3045-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT opunikwabenafrimpongmanso usefulnessofcombinedscreeningmethodsforrapiddetectionoffalsifiedandorsubstandardmedicinesintheabsenceofaconfirmatorymethod AT netteyhenry usefulnessofcombinedscreeningmethodsforrapiddetectionoffalsifiedandorsubstandardmedicinesintheabsenceofaconfirmatorymethod AT larbimarvinadjei usefulnessofcombinedscreeningmethodsforrapiddetectionoffalsifiedandorsubstandardmedicinesintheabsenceofaconfirmatorymethod AT amarteysalomenaaamerley usefulnessofcombinedscreeningmethodsforrapiddetectionoffalsifiedandorsubstandardmedicinesintheabsenceofaconfirmatorymethod AT ntigifty usefulnessofcombinedscreeningmethodsforrapiddetectionoffalsifiedandorsubstandardmedicinesintheabsenceofaconfirmatorymethod AT dzidonuabraham usefulnessofcombinedscreeningmethodsforrapiddetectionoffalsifiedandorsubstandardmedicinesintheabsenceofaconfirmatorymethod AT owusudansopatrick usefulnessofcombinedscreeningmethodsforrapiddetectionoffalsifiedandorsubstandardmedicinesintheabsenceofaconfirmatorymethod AT owusunicholasamoah usefulnessofcombinedscreeningmethodsforrapiddetectionoffalsifiedandorsubstandardmedicinesintheabsenceofaconfirmatorymethod AT nyarkoalexanderkwadwo usefulnessofcombinedscreeningmethodsforrapiddetectionoffalsifiedandorsubstandardmedicinesintheabsenceofaconfirmatorymethod |