Cargando…
Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training
OBJECTIVE: to validate an instrument designed to assess practical training and measure nursing student satisfaction with clinical practice modules. METHOD: cross-sectional study (academic year 2014-2015). Validation of the self-administered, anonymous, 17-item Nursing Student Satisfaction with Pract...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31826154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3102.3206 |
_version_ | 1783476858121093120 |
---|---|
author | Montejano-Lozoya, Raimunda Gea-Caballero, Vicente Miguel-Montoya, Isabel Juárez-Vela, Raúl Sanjuán-Quiles, Ángela Ferrer-Ferrandiz, Esperanza |
author_facet | Montejano-Lozoya, Raimunda Gea-Caballero, Vicente Miguel-Montoya, Isabel Juárez-Vela, Raúl Sanjuán-Quiles, Ángela Ferrer-Ferrandiz, Esperanza |
author_sort | Montejano-Lozoya, Raimunda |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: to validate an instrument designed to assess practical training and measure nursing student satisfaction with clinical practice modules. METHOD: cross-sectional study (academic year 2014-2015). Validation of the self-administered, anonymous, 17-item Nursing Student Satisfaction with Practical Training Questionnaire, developed by consensus by eight practical training experts in three nominal group sessions. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to assess internal consistency and validity. Student satisfaction was measured in relation to each module and all modules as a whole. RESULTS: 174 responses. High item-test correlation (≥0.90); Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91; Káiser-Meyer-Olkin index =0.86; the results of the Bartlett sphericity test were statistically significant (p<0.001); S-stress=0.17; R2=0.81. Exploratory factor analyses identified 4 factors: simulation, teacher tutoring, care facility selected for the placement, and clinician tutoring. Total explained variance was 66.6%. Confirmatory factor analysis obtained a chi-squared value of 285.275 (p= 0.000). Student satisfaction increases proportionately with each academic year. CONCLUSION: the questionnaire was shown to have good validity and is therefore a reliable instrument for measuring level of nursing student satisfaction with practical training in both clinical and simulated environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6896794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68967942019-12-13 Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training Montejano-Lozoya, Raimunda Gea-Caballero, Vicente Miguel-Montoya, Isabel Juárez-Vela, Raúl Sanjuán-Quiles, Ángela Ferrer-Ferrandiz, Esperanza Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Article OBJECTIVE: to validate an instrument designed to assess practical training and measure nursing student satisfaction with clinical practice modules. METHOD: cross-sectional study (academic year 2014-2015). Validation of the self-administered, anonymous, 17-item Nursing Student Satisfaction with Practical Training Questionnaire, developed by consensus by eight practical training experts in three nominal group sessions. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to assess internal consistency and validity. Student satisfaction was measured in relation to each module and all modules as a whole. RESULTS: 174 responses. High item-test correlation (≥0.90); Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91; Káiser-Meyer-Olkin index =0.86; the results of the Bartlett sphericity test were statistically significant (p<0.001); S-stress=0.17; R2=0.81. Exploratory factor analyses identified 4 factors: simulation, teacher tutoring, care facility selected for the placement, and clinician tutoring. Total explained variance was 66.6%. Confirmatory factor analysis obtained a chi-squared value of 285.275 (p= 0.000). Student satisfaction increases proportionately with each academic year. CONCLUSION: the questionnaire was shown to have good validity and is therefore a reliable instrument for measuring level of nursing student satisfaction with practical training in both clinical and simulated environments. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6896794/ /pubmed/31826154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3102.3206 Text en Copyright © 2019 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Montejano-Lozoya, Raimunda Gea-Caballero, Vicente Miguel-Montoya, Isabel Juárez-Vela, Raúl Sanjuán-Quiles, Ángela Ferrer-Ferrandiz, Esperanza Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training |
title | Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training |
title_full | Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training |
title_fullStr | Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training |
title_short | Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training |
title_sort | validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31826154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3102.3206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT montejanolozoyaraimunda validationofaquestionnairedesignedtomeasurenursingstudentsatisfactionwithpracticaltraining AT geacaballerovicente validationofaquestionnairedesignedtomeasurenursingstudentsatisfactionwithpracticaltraining AT miguelmontoyaisabel validationofaquestionnairedesignedtomeasurenursingstudentsatisfactionwithpracticaltraining AT juarezvelaraul validationofaquestionnairedesignedtomeasurenursingstudentsatisfactionwithpracticaltraining AT sanjuanquilesangela validationofaquestionnairedesignedtomeasurenursingstudentsatisfactionwithpracticaltraining AT ferrerferrandizesperanza validationofaquestionnairedesignedtomeasurenursingstudentsatisfactionwithpracticaltraining |