Cargando…

Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training

OBJECTIVE: to validate an instrument designed to assess practical training and measure nursing student satisfaction with clinical practice modules. METHOD: cross-sectional study (academic year 2014-2015). Validation of the self-administered, anonymous, 17-item Nursing Student Satisfaction with Pract...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montejano-Lozoya, Raimunda, Gea-Caballero, Vicente, Miguel-Montoya, Isabel, Juárez-Vela, Raúl, Sanjuán-Quiles, Ángela, Ferrer-Ferrandiz, Esperanza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31826154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3102.3206
_version_ 1783476858121093120
author Montejano-Lozoya, Raimunda
Gea-Caballero, Vicente
Miguel-Montoya, Isabel
Juárez-Vela, Raúl
Sanjuán-Quiles, Ángela
Ferrer-Ferrandiz, Esperanza
author_facet Montejano-Lozoya, Raimunda
Gea-Caballero, Vicente
Miguel-Montoya, Isabel
Juárez-Vela, Raúl
Sanjuán-Quiles, Ángela
Ferrer-Ferrandiz, Esperanza
author_sort Montejano-Lozoya, Raimunda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: to validate an instrument designed to assess practical training and measure nursing student satisfaction with clinical practice modules. METHOD: cross-sectional study (academic year 2014-2015). Validation of the self-administered, anonymous, 17-item Nursing Student Satisfaction with Practical Training Questionnaire, developed by consensus by eight practical training experts in three nominal group sessions. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to assess internal consistency and validity. Student satisfaction was measured in relation to each module and all modules as a whole. RESULTS: 174 responses. High item-test correlation (≥0.90); Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91; Káiser-Meyer-Olkin index =0.86; the results of the Bartlett sphericity test were statistically significant (p<0.001); S-stress=0.17; R2=0.81. Exploratory factor analyses identified 4 factors: simulation, teacher tutoring, care facility selected for the placement, and clinician tutoring. Total explained variance was 66.6%. Confirmatory factor analysis obtained a chi-squared value of 285.275 (p= 0.000). Student satisfaction increases proportionately with each academic year. CONCLUSION: the questionnaire was shown to have good validity and is therefore a reliable instrument for measuring level of nursing student satisfaction with practical training in both clinical and simulated environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6896794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68967942019-12-13 Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training Montejano-Lozoya, Raimunda Gea-Caballero, Vicente Miguel-Montoya, Isabel Juárez-Vela, Raúl Sanjuán-Quiles, Ángela Ferrer-Ferrandiz, Esperanza Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Article OBJECTIVE: to validate an instrument designed to assess practical training and measure nursing student satisfaction with clinical practice modules. METHOD: cross-sectional study (academic year 2014-2015). Validation of the self-administered, anonymous, 17-item Nursing Student Satisfaction with Practical Training Questionnaire, developed by consensus by eight practical training experts in three nominal group sessions. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to assess internal consistency and validity. Student satisfaction was measured in relation to each module and all modules as a whole. RESULTS: 174 responses. High item-test correlation (≥0.90); Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91; Káiser-Meyer-Olkin index =0.86; the results of the Bartlett sphericity test were statistically significant (p<0.001); S-stress=0.17; R2=0.81. Exploratory factor analyses identified 4 factors: simulation, teacher tutoring, care facility selected for the placement, and clinician tutoring. Total explained variance was 66.6%. Confirmatory factor analysis obtained a chi-squared value of 285.275 (p= 0.000). Student satisfaction increases proportionately with each academic year. CONCLUSION: the questionnaire was shown to have good validity and is therefore a reliable instrument for measuring level of nursing student satisfaction with practical training in both clinical and simulated environments. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6896794/ /pubmed/31826154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3102.3206 Text en Copyright © 2019 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Montejano-Lozoya, Raimunda
Gea-Caballero, Vicente
Miguel-Montoya, Isabel
Juárez-Vela, Raúl
Sanjuán-Quiles, Ángela
Ferrer-Ferrandiz, Esperanza
Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training
title Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training
title_full Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training
title_fullStr Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training
title_short Validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training
title_sort validation of a questionnaire designed to measure nursing student satisfaction with practical training
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6896794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31826154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3102.3206
work_keys_str_mv AT montejanolozoyaraimunda validationofaquestionnairedesignedtomeasurenursingstudentsatisfactionwithpracticaltraining
AT geacaballerovicente validationofaquestionnairedesignedtomeasurenursingstudentsatisfactionwithpracticaltraining
AT miguelmontoyaisabel validationofaquestionnairedesignedtomeasurenursingstudentsatisfactionwithpracticaltraining
AT juarezvelaraul validationofaquestionnairedesignedtomeasurenursingstudentsatisfactionwithpracticaltraining
AT sanjuanquilesangela validationofaquestionnairedesignedtomeasurenursingstudentsatisfactionwithpracticaltraining
AT ferrerferrandizesperanza validationofaquestionnairedesignedtomeasurenursingstudentsatisfactionwithpracticaltraining