Cargando…

Evaluation of Four Incisions Used For Radical Neck Dissection- A Comparative Study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the four commonly used incisions for Radical Neck Dissection on the basis of certain defined parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The investigators designed and implemented a prospective comparative study composed of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. The predictor varia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roy, Satadru, Shetty, Vikram, Sherigar, Vishwanath, Hegde, Padmaraj, Prasad, Rajendra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6897041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30803224
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.575
_version_ 1783476903502413824
author Roy, Satadru
Shetty, Vikram
Sherigar, Vishwanath
Hegde, Padmaraj
Prasad, Rajendra
author_facet Roy, Satadru
Shetty, Vikram
Sherigar, Vishwanath
Hegde, Padmaraj
Prasad, Rajendra
author_sort Roy, Satadru
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the four commonly used incisions for Radical Neck Dissection on the basis of certain defined parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The investigators designed and implemented a prospective comparative study composed of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. The predictor variable was time taken to raise and close the flaps, accessibility to the neck lymph nodes, injury to vital structures and scar cosmesis followed up to a period of three months. Descriptive statistics were computed. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 40 patients grouped as follows: Macfee Incision (=10 patients), Modified Macfee Incision (=10 patients), Modified Schobinger Incision (=10 patients) and Reverse Hockey Stick Incision (=10 patients). Group A, consisiting of the patients with Macfee Incision, took the least time to close among all the groups ( Mean= 32.60 minutes) while Group C (patients with Modified Schobinger Incision) required the most time for closure ( Mean= 51.90 minutes). The Modified Schobinger Incision provided best exposure to neck node levels. The Macfee Incision was found to have the best scar cosmesis among the four incisions. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that Modified Schobinger Incision is the preferred incision for adequate access to neck lymphatics while Macfee Incision was found to provide the best scar cosmesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6897041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68970412019-12-12 Evaluation of Four Incisions Used For Radical Neck Dissection- A Comparative Study Roy, Satadru Shetty, Vikram Sherigar, Vishwanath Hegde, Padmaraj Prasad, Rajendra Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the four commonly used incisions for Radical Neck Dissection on the basis of certain defined parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The investigators designed and implemented a prospective comparative study composed of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. The predictor variable was time taken to raise and close the flaps, accessibility to the neck lymph nodes, injury to vital structures and scar cosmesis followed up to a period of three months. Descriptive statistics were computed. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 40 patients grouped as follows: Macfee Incision (=10 patients), Modified Macfee Incision (=10 patients), Modified Schobinger Incision (=10 patients) and Reverse Hockey Stick Incision (=10 patients). Group A, consisiting of the patients with Macfee Incision, took the least time to close among all the groups ( Mean= 32.60 minutes) while Group C (patients with Modified Schobinger Incision) required the most time for closure ( Mean= 51.90 minutes). The Modified Schobinger Incision provided best exposure to neck node levels. The Macfee Incision was found to have the best scar cosmesis among the four incisions. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that Modified Schobinger Incision is the preferred incision for adequate access to neck lymphatics while Macfee Incision was found to provide the best scar cosmesis. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6897041/ /pubmed/30803224 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.575 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roy, Satadru
Shetty, Vikram
Sherigar, Vishwanath
Hegde, Padmaraj
Prasad, Rajendra
Evaluation of Four Incisions Used For Radical Neck Dissection- A Comparative Study
title Evaluation of Four Incisions Used For Radical Neck Dissection- A Comparative Study
title_full Evaluation of Four Incisions Used For Radical Neck Dissection- A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Four Incisions Used For Radical Neck Dissection- A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Four Incisions Used For Radical Neck Dissection- A Comparative Study
title_short Evaluation of Four Incisions Used For Radical Neck Dissection- A Comparative Study
title_sort evaluation of four incisions used for radical neck dissection- a comparative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6897041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30803224
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.575
work_keys_str_mv AT roysatadru evaluationoffourincisionsusedforradicalneckdissectionacomparativestudy
AT shettyvikram evaluationoffourincisionsusedforradicalneckdissectionacomparativestudy
AT sherigarvishwanath evaluationoffourincisionsusedforradicalneckdissectionacomparativestudy
AT hegdepadmaraj evaluationoffourincisionsusedforradicalneckdissectionacomparativestudy
AT prasadrajendra evaluationoffourincisionsusedforradicalneckdissectionacomparativestudy