Cargando…

Adhesions and Anti-Adhesion Systems Highlights

The peritoneal and intrauterine cavities are lined by fragile membranes with a high-wound healing capacity, e.g. repairing the endometrium in its cyclical “injury and scar-free repair process” during menstruation. However, peritoneal and intrauterine fibrosis and adhesions can develop after surgical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torres-De La Roche, LA, Campo, R, Devassy, R, Di Spiezio Sardo, A, Hooker, A, Koninckx, P, Urman, B, Wallwiener, M, De Wilde, RL
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universa Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6897521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824635
_version_ 1783476972594135040
author Torres-De La Roche, LA
Campo, R
Devassy, R
Di Spiezio Sardo, A
Hooker, A
Koninckx, P
Urman, B
Wallwiener, M
De Wilde, RL
author_facet Torres-De La Roche, LA
Campo, R
Devassy, R
Di Spiezio Sardo, A
Hooker, A
Koninckx, P
Urman, B
Wallwiener, M
De Wilde, RL
author_sort Torres-De La Roche, LA
collection PubMed
description The peritoneal and intrauterine cavities are lined by fragile membranes with a high-wound healing capacity, e.g. repairing the endometrium in its cyclical “injury and scar-free repair process” during menstruation. However, peritoneal and intrauterine fibrosis and adhesions can develop after surgical trauma through activation of molecular, immune and genetic mechanisms. During procedures with a high-risk of adhesions, the use of new peritoneal and intrauterine conditions in combination with anti-adhesion substances are promising measures to preserve peritoneal and endometrial function and avoid the most common complication of gynecological surgery. Highlights of adhesions and anti-adhesion prevention techniques in laparoscopic, laparotomic and hysteroscopic surgeries are discussed in this paper. Unfortunately, evidence is lacking to prove the superiority of one technique over its counterparts in terms of postoperative adhesions, such as instrumentation, type of energy, distending media, and intracavitary pressure. Additionally, there is limited evidence about the efficacy and outcomes of techniques and adjuvant measures used during adhesiolysis. The definition of a universal intrauterine adhesions classification scheme as well as a prognostic scoring system to identify women at high risk of postoperative adhesions are necessary for advising those who could benefit the most of the use of antiadhesion barriers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6897521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Universa Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68975212019-12-10 Adhesions and Anti-Adhesion Systems Highlights Torres-De La Roche, LA Campo, R Devassy, R Di Spiezio Sardo, A Hooker, A Koninckx, P Urman, B Wallwiener, M De Wilde, RL Facts Views Vis Obgyn Review The peritoneal and intrauterine cavities are lined by fragile membranes with a high-wound healing capacity, e.g. repairing the endometrium in its cyclical “injury and scar-free repair process” during menstruation. However, peritoneal and intrauterine fibrosis and adhesions can develop after surgical trauma through activation of molecular, immune and genetic mechanisms. During procedures with a high-risk of adhesions, the use of new peritoneal and intrauterine conditions in combination with anti-adhesion substances are promising measures to preserve peritoneal and endometrial function and avoid the most common complication of gynecological surgery. Highlights of adhesions and anti-adhesion prevention techniques in laparoscopic, laparotomic and hysteroscopic surgeries are discussed in this paper. Unfortunately, evidence is lacking to prove the superiority of one technique over its counterparts in terms of postoperative adhesions, such as instrumentation, type of energy, distending media, and intracavitary pressure. Additionally, there is limited evidence about the efficacy and outcomes of techniques and adjuvant measures used during adhesiolysis. The definition of a universal intrauterine adhesions classification scheme as well as a prognostic scoring system to identify women at high risk of postoperative adhesions are necessary for advising those who could benefit the most of the use of antiadhesion barriers. Universa Press 2019-06 2019-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6897521/ /pubmed/31824635 Text en Copyright © 2019 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Torres-De La Roche, LA
Campo, R
Devassy, R
Di Spiezio Sardo, A
Hooker, A
Koninckx, P
Urman, B
Wallwiener, M
De Wilde, RL
Adhesions and Anti-Adhesion Systems Highlights
title Adhesions and Anti-Adhesion Systems Highlights
title_full Adhesions and Anti-Adhesion Systems Highlights
title_fullStr Adhesions and Anti-Adhesion Systems Highlights
title_full_unstemmed Adhesions and Anti-Adhesion Systems Highlights
title_short Adhesions and Anti-Adhesion Systems Highlights
title_sort adhesions and anti-adhesion systems highlights
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6897521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824635
work_keys_str_mv AT torresdelarochela adhesionsandantiadhesionsystemshighlights
AT campor adhesionsandantiadhesionsystemshighlights
AT devassyr adhesionsandantiadhesionsystemshighlights
AT dispieziosardoa adhesionsandantiadhesionsystemshighlights
AT hookera adhesionsandantiadhesionsystemshighlights
AT koninckxp adhesionsandantiadhesionsystemshighlights
AT urmanb adhesionsandantiadhesionsystemshighlights
AT wallwienerm adhesionsandantiadhesionsystemshighlights
AT dewilderl adhesionsandantiadhesionsystemshighlights