Cargando…

Case selection for urological input in planned laparoscopic rectovaginal endometriosis surgery

BACKGROUND: Surgery for deep endometriosis often requires input from urological surgeons. This study aims to determine pre-operative and intra-operative factors that influence the need for urological input in laparoscopic resection of rectovaginal endometriosis and to assess the usefulness of a scor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fisher, G, Smith, RD, Saridogan, E, Vashisht, A, Allen, S, Arumuham, V, Cutner, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universa Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6897523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824632
_version_ 1783476973171900416
author Fisher, G
Smith, RD
Saridogan, E
Vashisht, A
Allen, S
Arumuham, V
Cutner, A
author_facet Fisher, G
Smith, RD
Saridogan, E
Vashisht, A
Allen, S
Arumuham, V
Cutner, A
author_sort Fisher, G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgery for deep endometriosis often requires input from urological surgeons. This study aims to determine pre-operative and intra-operative factors that influence the need for urological input in laparoscopic resection of rectovaginal endometriosis and to assess the usefulness of a scoring system to predict this. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 230 patients undergoing laparoscopic excision of deep endometriosis, at a tertiary referral centre for endometriosis in London UK, 2011 to 2015. Data from pre-operative assessment, surgery and post-operative follow up were analysed and patients were categorised according to their pre-operative and intra-operative risk factors. The primary outcome measure was the requirement of intra-operative input by urological surgeons. RESULTS: The median age was 35 years. In addition to the excision of endometriosis, 19.6% patients (45 patients) underwent hysterectomy, 14.8% (34 patients) required JJ stent placement, 6.1% (14 patients) had bowel resections and 2.6% (6 patients) required an ileostomy. 93.9% (216 patients) were considered normal-risk pre-operatively, of whom 89.4% (193/216) did not require any intra-operative urological input. 10.6% of this normal-risk group (23/216) required JJ stents, of whom 69.6% (16/23) also required a hysterectomy or bowel resection. Post operative complications occurred in 0.9% (2/216) of normal-risk patients, with none having required intra-operative urological reconstruction. Six percent (14 patients) were deemed to be increased-risk pre-operatively, of whom 78.6% (11/14) required JJ stent insertion. Thirty-six percent of increased-risk patients (5/14) had pre-operative renal dysfunction demonstrated on MAG3/DMSA and 80.0% of these (4/5) required intra-operative ureteric reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Patients considered normal-risk pre-operatively, planned for excision, without hysterectomy or bowel resection, can be safely managed without specific urology input. Patients with risk-features are highly likely to require urological input, particularly for JJ stent insertion. Patients with pre-operative renal dysfunction, demonstrated on MAG3/DMSA, have a high chance of requiring intra-operative ureteric reconstruction and are best managed with pre-planned reconstructive urologist input.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6897523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Universa Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68975232019-12-10 Case selection for urological input in planned laparoscopic rectovaginal endometriosis surgery Fisher, G Smith, RD Saridogan, E Vashisht, A Allen, S Arumuham, V Cutner, A Facts Views Vis Obgyn Original Paper BACKGROUND: Surgery for deep endometriosis often requires input from urological surgeons. This study aims to determine pre-operative and intra-operative factors that influence the need for urological input in laparoscopic resection of rectovaginal endometriosis and to assess the usefulness of a scoring system to predict this. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 230 patients undergoing laparoscopic excision of deep endometriosis, at a tertiary referral centre for endometriosis in London UK, 2011 to 2015. Data from pre-operative assessment, surgery and post-operative follow up were analysed and patients were categorised according to their pre-operative and intra-operative risk factors. The primary outcome measure was the requirement of intra-operative input by urological surgeons. RESULTS: The median age was 35 years. In addition to the excision of endometriosis, 19.6% patients (45 patients) underwent hysterectomy, 14.8% (34 patients) required JJ stent placement, 6.1% (14 patients) had bowel resections and 2.6% (6 patients) required an ileostomy. 93.9% (216 patients) were considered normal-risk pre-operatively, of whom 89.4% (193/216) did not require any intra-operative urological input. 10.6% of this normal-risk group (23/216) required JJ stents, of whom 69.6% (16/23) also required a hysterectomy or bowel resection. Post operative complications occurred in 0.9% (2/216) of normal-risk patients, with none having required intra-operative urological reconstruction. Six percent (14 patients) were deemed to be increased-risk pre-operatively, of whom 78.6% (11/14) required JJ stent insertion. Thirty-six percent of increased-risk patients (5/14) had pre-operative renal dysfunction demonstrated on MAG3/DMSA and 80.0% of these (4/5) required intra-operative ureteric reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Patients considered normal-risk pre-operatively, planned for excision, without hysterectomy or bowel resection, can be safely managed without specific urology input. Patients with risk-features are highly likely to require urological input, particularly for JJ stent insertion. Patients with pre-operative renal dysfunction, demonstrated on MAG3/DMSA, have a high chance of requiring intra-operative ureteric reconstruction and are best managed with pre-planned reconstructive urologist input. Universa Press 2019-06 2019-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6897523/ /pubmed/31824632 Text en Copyright © 2019 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Fisher, G
Smith, RD
Saridogan, E
Vashisht, A
Allen, S
Arumuham, V
Cutner, A
Case selection for urological input in planned laparoscopic rectovaginal endometriosis surgery
title Case selection for urological input in planned laparoscopic rectovaginal endometriosis surgery
title_full Case selection for urological input in planned laparoscopic rectovaginal endometriosis surgery
title_fullStr Case selection for urological input in planned laparoscopic rectovaginal endometriosis surgery
title_full_unstemmed Case selection for urological input in planned laparoscopic rectovaginal endometriosis surgery
title_short Case selection for urological input in planned laparoscopic rectovaginal endometriosis surgery
title_sort case selection for urological input in planned laparoscopic rectovaginal endometriosis surgery
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6897523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31824632
work_keys_str_mv AT fisherg caseselectionforurologicalinputinplannedlaparoscopicrectovaginalendometriosissurgery
AT smithrd caseselectionforurologicalinputinplannedlaparoscopicrectovaginalendometriosissurgery
AT saridogane caseselectionforurologicalinputinplannedlaparoscopicrectovaginalendometriosissurgery
AT vashishta caseselectionforurologicalinputinplannedlaparoscopicrectovaginalendometriosissurgery
AT allens caseselectionforurologicalinputinplannedlaparoscopicrectovaginalendometriosissurgery
AT arumuhamv caseselectionforurologicalinputinplannedlaparoscopicrectovaginalendometriosissurgery
AT cutnera caseselectionforurologicalinputinplannedlaparoscopicrectovaginalendometriosissurgery