Cargando…

Comparisons of Rivaroxaban Following Different Dosage Criteria (ROCKET AF or J‐ROCKET AF Trials) in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND: The ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) evaluated rivaroxaban (20/15 mg/d) versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. A separate trial, J‐ROCKE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Yi‐Hsin, Lee, Hsin‐Fu, Wang, Chun‐Li, Chang, Shang‐Hung, Yeh, Chih‐Hsin, Chao, Tze‐Fan, Yeh, Yung‐Hsin, Chen, Shih‐Ann, Kuo, Chi‐Tai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6898830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013053
_version_ 1783477035615649792
author Chan, Yi‐Hsin
Lee, Hsin‐Fu
Wang, Chun‐Li
Chang, Shang‐Hung
Yeh, Chih‐Hsin
Chao, Tze‐Fan
Yeh, Yung‐Hsin
Chen, Shih‐Ann
Kuo, Chi‐Tai
author_facet Chan, Yi‐Hsin
Lee, Hsin‐Fu
Wang, Chun‐Li
Chang, Shang‐Hung
Yeh, Chih‐Hsin
Chao, Tze‐Fan
Yeh, Yung‐Hsin
Chen, Shih‐Ann
Kuo, Chi‐Tai
author_sort Chan, Yi‐Hsin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) evaluated rivaroxaban (20/15 mg/d) versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. A separate trial, J‐ROCKET AF (Japanese ROCKET AF), compared rivaroxaban (15/10 mg/d) and warfarin in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation. Data about rivaroxaban following J‐ROCKET AF criteria compared with warfarin and ROCKET AF dosage were limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study used medical data from a multicenter healthcare provider in Taiwan that included 3162 patients taking rivaroxaban. Among 2320 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥50 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), 384 and 1936 patients followed the ROCKET AF (20 mg/d) and J‐ROCKET AF (15 mg/d) recommendation, respectively. Among 842 patients with an eGFR <50 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), 422 and 420 patients followed the ROCKET AF (15 mg/d) and J‐ROCKET AF (10 mg/d) recommendation, respectively. A total of 2053 patients with atrial fibrillation receiving warfarin were identified. Rivaroxaban following either ROCKET AF or J‐ROCKET AF dosage criteria was associated with a comparable risk of thromboembolism but a lower risk of bleeding than warfarin. For patients with an eGFR ≥50 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), risks of clinical events did not differ significantly between the 2 dosage criteria of rivaroxaban. For patients with an eGFR <50 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), the ROCKET AF dosage was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding compared with the J‐ROCKET AF dosage (hazard ratio, 2.70; P=0.0445) without significant differences regarding the risk of ischemic events. CONCLUSIONS: In Asian patients with atrial fibrillation, the J‐ROCKET AF dosage was as effective as the ROCKET AF dosage irrespective of renal function. The risk of major bleeding was lower with the J‐ROCKET AF dosage in patients with an eGFR <50 mL/min per 1.73 m(2). Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban following either dosage criteria was effective and even safer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6898830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68988302019-12-16 Comparisons of Rivaroxaban Following Different Dosage Criteria (ROCKET AF or J‐ROCKET AF Trials) in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Chan, Yi‐Hsin Lee, Hsin‐Fu Wang, Chun‐Li Chang, Shang‐Hung Yeh, Chih‐Hsin Chao, Tze‐Fan Yeh, Yung‐Hsin Chen, Shih‐Ann Kuo, Chi‐Tai J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) evaluated rivaroxaban (20/15 mg/d) versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. A separate trial, J‐ROCKET AF (Japanese ROCKET AF), compared rivaroxaban (15/10 mg/d) and warfarin in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation. Data about rivaroxaban following J‐ROCKET AF criteria compared with warfarin and ROCKET AF dosage were limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study used medical data from a multicenter healthcare provider in Taiwan that included 3162 patients taking rivaroxaban. Among 2320 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥50 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), 384 and 1936 patients followed the ROCKET AF (20 mg/d) and J‐ROCKET AF (15 mg/d) recommendation, respectively. Among 842 patients with an eGFR <50 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), 422 and 420 patients followed the ROCKET AF (15 mg/d) and J‐ROCKET AF (10 mg/d) recommendation, respectively. A total of 2053 patients with atrial fibrillation receiving warfarin were identified. Rivaroxaban following either ROCKET AF or J‐ROCKET AF dosage criteria was associated with a comparable risk of thromboembolism but a lower risk of bleeding than warfarin. For patients with an eGFR ≥50 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), risks of clinical events did not differ significantly between the 2 dosage criteria of rivaroxaban. For patients with an eGFR <50 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), the ROCKET AF dosage was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding compared with the J‐ROCKET AF dosage (hazard ratio, 2.70; P=0.0445) without significant differences regarding the risk of ischemic events. CONCLUSIONS: In Asian patients with atrial fibrillation, the J‐ROCKET AF dosage was as effective as the ROCKET AF dosage irrespective of renal function. The risk of major bleeding was lower with the J‐ROCKET AF dosage in patients with an eGFR <50 mL/min per 1.73 m(2). Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban following either dosage criteria was effective and even safer. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6898830/ /pubmed/31623498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013053 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Chan, Yi‐Hsin
Lee, Hsin‐Fu
Wang, Chun‐Li
Chang, Shang‐Hung
Yeh, Chih‐Hsin
Chao, Tze‐Fan
Yeh, Yung‐Hsin
Chen, Shih‐Ann
Kuo, Chi‐Tai
Comparisons of Rivaroxaban Following Different Dosage Criteria (ROCKET AF or J‐ROCKET AF Trials) in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
title Comparisons of Rivaroxaban Following Different Dosage Criteria (ROCKET AF or J‐ROCKET AF Trials) in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
title_full Comparisons of Rivaroxaban Following Different Dosage Criteria (ROCKET AF or J‐ROCKET AF Trials) in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
title_fullStr Comparisons of Rivaroxaban Following Different Dosage Criteria (ROCKET AF or J‐ROCKET AF Trials) in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of Rivaroxaban Following Different Dosage Criteria (ROCKET AF or J‐ROCKET AF Trials) in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
title_short Comparisons of Rivaroxaban Following Different Dosage Criteria (ROCKET AF or J‐ROCKET AF Trials) in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
title_sort comparisons of rivaroxaban following different dosage criteria (rocket af or j‐rocket af trials) in asian patients with atrial fibrillation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6898830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31623498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013053
work_keys_str_mv AT chanyihsin comparisonsofrivaroxabanfollowingdifferentdosagecriteriarocketaforjrocketaftrialsinasianpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT leehsinfu comparisonsofrivaroxabanfollowingdifferentdosagecriteriarocketaforjrocketaftrialsinasianpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT wangchunli comparisonsofrivaroxabanfollowingdifferentdosagecriteriarocketaforjrocketaftrialsinasianpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT changshanghung comparisonsofrivaroxabanfollowingdifferentdosagecriteriarocketaforjrocketaftrialsinasianpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT yehchihhsin comparisonsofrivaroxabanfollowingdifferentdosagecriteriarocketaforjrocketaftrialsinasianpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT chaotzefan comparisonsofrivaroxabanfollowingdifferentdosagecriteriarocketaforjrocketaftrialsinasianpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT yehyunghsin comparisonsofrivaroxabanfollowingdifferentdosagecriteriarocketaforjrocketaftrialsinasianpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT chenshihann comparisonsofrivaroxabanfollowingdifferentdosagecriteriarocketaforjrocketaftrialsinasianpatientswithatrialfibrillation
AT kuochitai comparisonsofrivaroxabanfollowingdifferentdosagecriteriarocketaforjrocketaftrialsinasianpatientswithatrialfibrillation