Cargando…

Tremor Control Devices for Essential Tremor: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in nonpharmacological approaches for essential tremor (ET), including tremor cancelation devices. However, the true efficacy of such devices in ET remains unclear. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using standardized criteria regarding effi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castrillo-Fraile, Victoria, Peña, Elena Casas, Gabriel y Galán, José María Trejo, Delgado-López, Pedro David, Collazo, Carla, Cubo, Esther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Columbia University Libraries/Information Services 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6898897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31867136
http://dx.doi.org/10.7916/tohm.v0.688
_version_ 1783477051406155776
author Castrillo-Fraile, Victoria
Peña, Elena Casas
Gabriel y Galán, José María Trejo
Delgado-López, Pedro David
Collazo, Carla
Cubo, Esther
author_facet Castrillo-Fraile, Victoria
Peña, Elena Casas
Gabriel y Galán, José María Trejo
Delgado-López, Pedro David
Collazo, Carla
Cubo, Esther
author_sort Castrillo-Fraile, Victoria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in nonpharmacological approaches for essential tremor (ET), including tremor cancelation devices. However, the true efficacy of such devices in ET remains unclear. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using standardized criteria regarding efficacy and comfortability. Devices focused on design or experimental testing in which tremor was simulated in a robot were excluded. RESULTS: Out of 324 articles initially identified, 12 articles were included. Orthoses using biomechanical loading and neuromodulation with electrical stimulation, and external tremor cancelation devices, were the main interventions used to suppress tremor. All devices were designed to control tremor of the upper limbs at different anatomical locations. Overall, an average tremor attenuation of 50–98% was reported (level of evidence III). Interference with voluntary movements and portability was described as the main drawback. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, this review highlights the growing interest in emerging tremor control devices and the importance of assessing comfort without affecting voluntary movements. However, the level of evidence regarding the efficacy of these tremor control devices remains low. An integrated multidisciplinary combination approach of engineering, robotics, physiology, physiotherapy, and clinical assessment is needed to improve the quality of non-pharmacological interventions for ET.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6898897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Columbia University Libraries/Information Services
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68988972019-12-20 Tremor Control Devices for Essential Tremor: A Systematic Literature Review Castrillo-Fraile, Victoria Peña, Elena Casas Gabriel y Galán, José María Trejo Delgado-López, Pedro David Collazo, Carla Cubo, Esther Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) Reviews BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in nonpharmacological approaches for essential tremor (ET), including tremor cancelation devices. However, the true efficacy of such devices in ET remains unclear. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using standardized criteria regarding efficacy and comfortability. Devices focused on design or experimental testing in which tremor was simulated in a robot were excluded. RESULTS: Out of 324 articles initially identified, 12 articles were included. Orthoses using biomechanical loading and neuromodulation with electrical stimulation, and external tremor cancelation devices, were the main interventions used to suppress tremor. All devices were designed to control tremor of the upper limbs at different anatomical locations. Overall, an average tremor attenuation of 50–98% was reported (level of evidence III). Interference with voluntary movements and portability was described as the main drawback. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, this review highlights the growing interest in emerging tremor control devices and the importance of assessing comfort without affecting voluntary movements. However, the level of evidence regarding the efficacy of these tremor control devices remains low. An integrated multidisciplinary combination approach of engineering, robotics, physiology, physiotherapy, and clinical assessment is needed to improve the quality of non-pharmacological interventions for ET. Columbia University Libraries/Information Services 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6898897/ /pubmed/31867136 http://dx.doi.org/10.7916/tohm.v0.688 Text en © 2019 Castrillo-Fraile et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–Noncommercial–No Derivatives License, which permits the user to copy, distribute, and transmit the work provided that the original authors and source are credited; that no commercial use is made of the work; and that the work is not altered or transformed.
spellingShingle Reviews
Castrillo-Fraile, Victoria
Peña, Elena Casas
Gabriel y Galán, José María Trejo
Delgado-López, Pedro David
Collazo, Carla
Cubo, Esther
Tremor Control Devices for Essential Tremor: A Systematic Literature Review
title Tremor Control Devices for Essential Tremor: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Tremor Control Devices for Essential Tremor: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Tremor Control Devices for Essential Tremor: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Tremor Control Devices for Essential Tremor: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Tremor Control Devices for Essential Tremor: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort tremor control devices for essential tremor: a systematic literature review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6898897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31867136
http://dx.doi.org/10.7916/tohm.v0.688
work_keys_str_mv AT castrillofrailevictoria tremorcontroldevicesforessentialtremorasystematicliteraturereview
AT penaelenacasas tremorcontroldevicesforessentialtremorasystematicliteraturereview
AT gabrielygalanjosemariatrejo tremorcontroldevicesforessentialtremorasystematicliteraturereview
AT delgadolopezpedrodavid tremorcontroldevicesforessentialtremorasystematicliteraturereview
AT collazocarla tremorcontroldevicesforessentialtremorasystematicliteraturereview
AT cuboesther tremorcontroldevicesforessentialtremorasystematicliteraturereview