Knowing in general dental practice: Anticipation, constraint, and collective bricolage

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: Much of the literature concerned with health care practice tends to focus on a decision‐making model in which knowledge sits within the minds and bodies of health care workers. Practice theories de‐centre knowledge from human actors, instead situating knowing in the interactions between all human and non‐human actors. The purpose of this study was to explore how practice arises in the moment‐to‐moment interactions between general dental practitioners (GDPs), patients, nurses, and things. METHOD: Eight GDPs in two dental practices, their respective nurses, 23 patients, and material things were video‐recorded as they interacted within clinical encounters. Videos were analysed using a performative approach. Several analytic methods were used: coding of interactions in‐video; pencil drawings with transcripts; and dynamic transcription. These were used pragmatically and in combination. Detailed reflective notes were recorded at all stages of the analysis, and, as new insights developed, theory was sought to help inform these. RESULTS: We theorized that knowing in dental practice arises as actors translate embodied knowing through sayings and doings that anticipate but cannot predict responses, that knowing is constrained by the interactions of the practice but that the interactions at the same time are a collective bricolage—using the actors' respective embodied knowing to generate and solve problems together. CONCLUSION: Practices are ongoing ecological accomplishments to which people and things skilfully contribute through translation of their respective embodied knowing of multiple practices. Based on this, we argue that practices are more likely to improve if people and things embody practices of improvement.