Cargando…

Radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on MRI

BACKGROUND: Well differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) can be difficult to distinguish from lipoma. Currently, this distinction is made by testing for MDM2 amplification, which requires a biopsy. The aim of this study was to develop a noninvasive method to predict MDM2 amplification status using radiom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vos, M., Starmans, M. P. A., Timbergen, M. J. M., van der Voort, S. R., Padmos, G. A., Kessels, W., Niessen, W. J., van Leenders, G. J. L. H., Grünhagen, D. J., Sleijfer, S., Verhoef, C., Klein, S., Visser, J. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31747074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11410
_version_ 1783477149809770496
author Vos, M.
Starmans, M. P. A.
Timbergen, M. J. M.
van der Voort, S. R.
Padmos, G. A.
Kessels, W.
Niessen, W. J.
van Leenders, G. J. L. H.
Grünhagen, D. J.
Sleijfer, S.
Verhoef, C.
Klein, S.
Visser, J. J.
author_facet Vos, M.
Starmans, M. P. A.
Timbergen, M. J. M.
van der Voort, S. R.
Padmos, G. A.
Kessels, W.
Niessen, W. J.
van Leenders, G. J. L. H.
Grünhagen, D. J.
Sleijfer, S.
Verhoef, C.
Klein, S.
Visser, J. J.
author_sort Vos, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Well differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) can be difficult to distinguish from lipoma. Currently, this distinction is made by testing for MDM2 amplification, which requires a biopsy. The aim of this study was to develop a noninvasive method to predict MDM2 amplification status using radiomics features derived from MRI. METHODS: Patients with an MDM2‐negative lipoma or MDM2‐positive WDLPS and a pretreatment T1‐weighted MRI scan who were referred to Erasmus MC between 2009 and 2018 were included. When available, other MRI sequences were included in the radiomics analysis. Features describing intensity, shape and texture were extracted from the tumour region. Classification was performed using various machine learning approaches. Evaluation was performed through a 100 times random‐split cross‐validation. The performance of the models was compared with the performance of three expert radiologists. RESULTS: The data set included 116 tumours (58 patients with lipoma, 58 with WDLPS) and originated from 41 different MRI scanners, resulting in wide heterogeneity in imaging hardware and acquisition protocols. The radiomics model based on T1 imaging features alone resulted in a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0·83, sensitivity of 0·68 and specificity of 0·84. Adding the T2‐weighted imaging features in an explorative analysis improved the model to a mean AUC of 0·89, sensitivity of 0·74 and specificity of 0·88. The three radiologists scored an AUC of 0·74 and 0·72 and 0·61 respectively; a sensitivity of 0·74, 0·91 and 0·64; and a specificity of 0·55, 0·36 and 0·59. CONCLUSION: Radiomics is a promising, non‐invasive method for differentiating between WDLPS and lipoma, outperforming the scores of the radiologists. Further optimization and validation is needed before introduction into clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6899528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68995282019-12-19 Radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on MRI Vos, M. Starmans, M. P. A. Timbergen, M. J. M. van der Voort, S. R. Padmos, G. A. Kessels, W. Niessen, W. J. van Leenders, G. J. L. H. Grünhagen, D. J. Sleijfer, S. Verhoef, C. Klein, S. Visser, J. J. Br J Surg Original Articles BACKGROUND: Well differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) can be difficult to distinguish from lipoma. Currently, this distinction is made by testing for MDM2 amplification, which requires a biopsy. The aim of this study was to develop a noninvasive method to predict MDM2 amplification status using radiomics features derived from MRI. METHODS: Patients with an MDM2‐negative lipoma or MDM2‐positive WDLPS and a pretreatment T1‐weighted MRI scan who were referred to Erasmus MC between 2009 and 2018 were included. When available, other MRI sequences were included in the radiomics analysis. Features describing intensity, shape and texture were extracted from the tumour region. Classification was performed using various machine learning approaches. Evaluation was performed through a 100 times random‐split cross‐validation. The performance of the models was compared with the performance of three expert radiologists. RESULTS: The data set included 116 tumours (58 patients with lipoma, 58 with WDLPS) and originated from 41 different MRI scanners, resulting in wide heterogeneity in imaging hardware and acquisition protocols. The radiomics model based on T1 imaging features alone resulted in a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0·83, sensitivity of 0·68 and specificity of 0·84. Adding the T2‐weighted imaging features in an explorative analysis improved the model to a mean AUC of 0·89, sensitivity of 0·74 and specificity of 0·88. The three radiologists scored an AUC of 0·74 and 0·72 and 0·61 respectively; a sensitivity of 0·74, 0·91 and 0·64; and a specificity of 0·55, 0·36 and 0·59. CONCLUSION: Radiomics is a promising, non‐invasive method for differentiating between WDLPS and lipoma, outperforming the scores of the radiologists. Further optimization and validation is needed before introduction into clinical practice. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019-11-20 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6899528/ /pubmed/31747074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11410 Text en © 2019 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Vos, M.
Starmans, M. P. A.
Timbergen, M. J. M.
van der Voort, S. R.
Padmos, G. A.
Kessels, W.
Niessen, W. J.
van Leenders, G. J. L. H.
Grünhagen, D. J.
Sleijfer, S.
Verhoef, C.
Klein, S.
Visser, J. J.
Radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on MRI
title Radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on MRI
title_full Radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on MRI
title_fullStr Radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on MRI
title_full_unstemmed Radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on MRI
title_short Radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on MRI
title_sort radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on mri
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31747074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11410
work_keys_str_mv AT vosm radiomicsapproachtodistinguishbetweenwelldifferentiatedliposarcomasandlipomasonmri
AT starmansmpa radiomicsapproachtodistinguishbetweenwelldifferentiatedliposarcomasandlipomasonmri
AT timbergenmjm radiomicsapproachtodistinguishbetweenwelldifferentiatedliposarcomasandlipomasonmri
AT vandervoortsr radiomicsapproachtodistinguishbetweenwelldifferentiatedliposarcomasandlipomasonmri
AT padmosga radiomicsapproachtodistinguishbetweenwelldifferentiatedliposarcomasandlipomasonmri
AT kesselsw radiomicsapproachtodistinguishbetweenwelldifferentiatedliposarcomasandlipomasonmri
AT niessenwj radiomicsapproachtodistinguishbetweenwelldifferentiatedliposarcomasandlipomasonmri
AT vanleendersgjlh radiomicsapproachtodistinguishbetweenwelldifferentiatedliposarcomasandlipomasonmri
AT grunhagendj radiomicsapproachtodistinguishbetweenwelldifferentiatedliposarcomasandlipomasonmri
AT sleijfers radiomicsapproachtodistinguishbetweenwelldifferentiatedliposarcomasandlipomasonmri
AT verhoefc radiomicsapproachtodistinguishbetweenwelldifferentiatedliposarcomasandlipomasonmri
AT kleins radiomicsapproachtodistinguishbetweenwelldifferentiatedliposarcomasandlipomasonmri
AT visserjj radiomicsapproachtodistinguishbetweenwelldifferentiatedliposarcomasandlipomasonmri