Cargando…

Noniterative Doubles Corrections to the Random Phase and Higher Random Phase Approximations: Singlet and Triplet Excitation Energies

The second‐order noniterative doubles‐corrected random phase approximation (RPA) method has been extended to triplet excitation energies and the doubles‐corrected higher RPA method as well as a shifted version for calculating singlet and triplet excitation energies are presented here for the first t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haase, Pi A. B., Faber, Rasmus, Provasi, Patricio F., Sauer, Stephan P. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.26074
_version_ 1783477155618881536
author Haase, Pi A. B.
Faber, Rasmus
Provasi, Patricio F.
Sauer, Stephan P. A.
author_facet Haase, Pi A. B.
Faber, Rasmus
Provasi, Patricio F.
Sauer, Stephan P. A.
author_sort Haase, Pi A. B.
collection PubMed
description The second‐order noniterative doubles‐corrected random phase approximation (RPA) method has been extended to triplet excitation energies and the doubles‐corrected higher RPA method as well as a shifted version for calculating singlet and triplet excitation energies are presented here for the first time. A benchmark set consisting of 20 molecules with a total of 117 singlet and 71 triplet excited states has been used to test the performance of the new methods by comparison with previous results obtained with the second‐order polarization propagator approximation (SOPPA) and the third order approximate coupled cluster singles, doubles and triples model CC3. In general, the second‐order doubles corrections to RPA and HRPA significantly reduce both the mean deviation as well as the standard deviation of the errors compared to the CC3 results. The accuracy of the new methods approaches the accuracy of the SOPPA method while using only 10–60% of the calculation time. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Computational Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6899555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68995552019-12-19 Noniterative Doubles Corrections to the Random Phase and Higher Random Phase Approximations: Singlet and Triplet Excitation Energies Haase, Pi A. B. Faber, Rasmus Provasi, Patricio F. Sauer, Stephan P. A. J Comput Chem Full Papers The second‐order noniterative doubles‐corrected random phase approximation (RPA) method has been extended to triplet excitation energies and the doubles‐corrected higher RPA method as well as a shifted version for calculating singlet and triplet excitation energies are presented here for the first time. A benchmark set consisting of 20 molecules with a total of 117 singlet and 71 triplet excited states has been used to test the performance of the new methods by comparison with previous results obtained with the second‐order polarization propagator approximation (SOPPA) and the third order approximate coupled cluster singles, doubles and triples model CC3. In general, the second‐order doubles corrections to RPA and HRPA significantly reduce both the mean deviation as well as the standard deviation of the errors compared to the CC3 results. The accuracy of the new methods approaches the accuracy of the SOPPA method while using only 10–60% of the calculation time. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Computational Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-10-01 2020-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6899555/ /pubmed/31576598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.26074 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Computational Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Haase, Pi A. B.
Faber, Rasmus
Provasi, Patricio F.
Sauer, Stephan P. A.
Noniterative Doubles Corrections to the Random Phase and Higher Random Phase Approximations: Singlet and Triplet Excitation Energies
title Noniterative Doubles Corrections to the Random Phase and Higher Random Phase Approximations: Singlet and Triplet Excitation Energies
title_full Noniterative Doubles Corrections to the Random Phase and Higher Random Phase Approximations: Singlet and Triplet Excitation Energies
title_fullStr Noniterative Doubles Corrections to the Random Phase and Higher Random Phase Approximations: Singlet and Triplet Excitation Energies
title_full_unstemmed Noniterative Doubles Corrections to the Random Phase and Higher Random Phase Approximations: Singlet and Triplet Excitation Energies
title_short Noniterative Doubles Corrections to the Random Phase and Higher Random Phase Approximations: Singlet and Triplet Excitation Energies
title_sort noniterative doubles corrections to the random phase and higher random phase approximations: singlet and triplet excitation energies
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31576598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.26074
work_keys_str_mv AT haasepiab noniterativedoublescorrectionstotherandomphaseandhigherrandomphaseapproximationssingletandtripletexcitationenergies
AT faberrasmus noniterativedoublescorrectionstotherandomphaseandhigherrandomphaseapproximationssingletandtripletexcitationenergies
AT provasipatriciof noniterativedoublescorrectionstotherandomphaseandhigherrandomphaseapproximationssingletandtripletexcitationenergies
AT sauerstephanpa noniterativedoublescorrectionstotherandomphaseandhigherrandomphaseapproximationssingletandtripletexcitationenergies