Cargando…

Qualitative Approach to Comparative Exposure in Alternatives Assessment

Most alternatives assessments (AAs) published to date are largely hazard‐based rankings, thereby ignoring potential differences in human and/or ecosystem exposures; as such, they may not represent a fully informed consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of possible alternatives. Building o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greggs, William, Burns, Thomas, Egeghy, Peter, Embry, Michelle R, Fantke, Peter, Gaborek, Bonnie, Heine, Lauren, Jolliet, Olivier, Lee, Carolyn, Muir, Derek, Plotzke, Kathy, Rinkevich, Joseph, Sunger, Neha, Tanir, Jennifer Y, Whittaker, Margaret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29917303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4070
_version_ 1783477158206767104
author Greggs, William
Burns, Thomas
Egeghy, Peter
Embry, Michelle R
Fantke, Peter
Gaborek, Bonnie
Heine, Lauren
Jolliet, Olivier
Lee, Carolyn
Muir, Derek
Plotzke, Kathy
Rinkevich, Joseph
Sunger, Neha
Tanir, Jennifer Y
Whittaker, Margaret
author_facet Greggs, William
Burns, Thomas
Egeghy, Peter
Embry, Michelle R
Fantke, Peter
Gaborek, Bonnie
Heine, Lauren
Jolliet, Olivier
Lee, Carolyn
Muir, Derek
Plotzke, Kathy
Rinkevich, Joseph
Sunger, Neha
Tanir, Jennifer Y
Whittaker, Margaret
author_sort Greggs, William
collection PubMed
description Most alternatives assessments (AAs) published to date are largely hazard‐based rankings, thereby ignoring potential differences in human and/or ecosystem exposures; as such, they may not represent a fully informed consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of possible alternatives. Building on the 2014 US National Academy of Sciences recommendations to improve AA decisions by including comparative exposure assessment into AAs, the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute's (HESI) Sustainable Chemical Alternatives Technical Committee, which comprises scientists from academia, industry, government, and nonprofit organizations, developed a qualitative comparative exposure approach. Conducting such a comparison can screen for alternatives that are expected to have a higher or different routes of human or environmental exposure potential, which together with consideration of the hazard assessment, could trigger a higher tiered, more quantitative exposure assessment on the alternatives being considered, minimizing the likelihood of regrettable substitution. This article outlines an approach for including chemical ingredient‐ and product‐related exposure information in a qualitative comparison, including ingredient and product‐related parameters. A classification approach was developed for ingredient and product parameters to support comparisons between alternatives as well as a methodology to address exposure parameter relevance and data quality. The ingredient parameters include a range of physicochemical properties that can impact routes and magnitude of exposure, whereas the product parameters include aspects such as product‐specific exposure pathways, use information, accessibility, and disposal. Two case studies are used to demonstrate the application of the methodology. Key learnings and future research needs are summarized. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2018;00:000–000. © 2018 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6899567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68995672019-12-19 Qualitative Approach to Comparative Exposure in Alternatives Assessment Greggs, William Burns, Thomas Egeghy, Peter Embry, Michelle R Fantke, Peter Gaborek, Bonnie Heine, Lauren Jolliet, Olivier Lee, Carolyn Muir, Derek Plotzke, Kathy Rinkevich, Joseph Sunger, Neha Tanir, Jennifer Y Whittaker, Margaret Integr Environ Assess Manag Special Series: Advances in Methods and Practice of Alternatives Assessment Most alternatives assessments (AAs) published to date are largely hazard‐based rankings, thereby ignoring potential differences in human and/or ecosystem exposures; as such, they may not represent a fully informed consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of possible alternatives. Building on the 2014 US National Academy of Sciences recommendations to improve AA decisions by including comparative exposure assessment into AAs, the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute's (HESI) Sustainable Chemical Alternatives Technical Committee, which comprises scientists from academia, industry, government, and nonprofit organizations, developed a qualitative comparative exposure approach. Conducting such a comparison can screen for alternatives that are expected to have a higher or different routes of human or environmental exposure potential, which together with consideration of the hazard assessment, could trigger a higher tiered, more quantitative exposure assessment on the alternatives being considered, minimizing the likelihood of regrettable substitution. This article outlines an approach for including chemical ingredient‐ and product‐related exposure information in a qualitative comparison, including ingredient and product‐related parameters. A classification approach was developed for ingredient and product parameters to support comparisons between alternatives as well as a methodology to address exposure parameter relevance and data quality. The ingredient parameters include a range of physicochemical properties that can impact routes and magnitude of exposure, whereas the product parameters include aspects such as product‐specific exposure pathways, use information, accessibility, and disposal. Two case studies are used to demonstrate the application of the methodology. Key learnings and future research needs are summarized. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2018;00:000–000. © 2018 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC) John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-19 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6899567/ /pubmed/29917303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4070 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC) This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Series: Advances in Methods and Practice of Alternatives Assessment
Greggs, William
Burns, Thomas
Egeghy, Peter
Embry, Michelle R
Fantke, Peter
Gaborek, Bonnie
Heine, Lauren
Jolliet, Olivier
Lee, Carolyn
Muir, Derek
Plotzke, Kathy
Rinkevich, Joseph
Sunger, Neha
Tanir, Jennifer Y
Whittaker, Margaret
Qualitative Approach to Comparative Exposure in Alternatives Assessment
title Qualitative Approach to Comparative Exposure in Alternatives Assessment
title_full Qualitative Approach to Comparative Exposure in Alternatives Assessment
title_fullStr Qualitative Approach to Comparative Exposure in Alternatives Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative Approach to Comparative Exposure in Alternatives Assessment
title_short Qualitative Approach to Comparative Exposure in Alternatives Assessment
title_sort qualitative approach to comparative exposure in alternatives assessment
topic Special Series: Advances in Methods and Practice of Alternatives Assessment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29917303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4070
work_keys_str_mv AT greggswilliam qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment
AT burnsthomas qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment
AT egeghypeter qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment
AT embrymicheller qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment
AT fantkepeter qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment
AT gaborekbonnie qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment
AT heinelauren qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment
AT jollietolivier qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment
AT leecarolyn qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment
AT muirderek qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment
AT plotzkekathy qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment
AT rinkevichjoseph qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment
AT sungerneha qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment
AT tanirjennifery qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment
AT whittakermargaret qualitativeapproachtocomparativeexposureinalternativesassessment