Cargando…

Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The overuse and misuse of antibiotics, especially for viral, and self‐limiting, respiratory tract infections such as sore throat, increases the risk of the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance within communities. Up to 80% of sore throat cases have a viral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Essack, Sabiha, Bell, John, Burgoyne, Douglas S., Duerden, Martin, Shephard, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13012
_version_ 1783477169007099904
author Essack, Sabiha
Bell, John
Burgoyne, Douglas S.
Duerden, Martin
Shephard, Adrian
author_facet Essack, Sabiha
Bell, John
Burgoyne, Douglas S.
Duerden, Martin
Shephard, Adrian
author_sort Essack, Sabiha
collection PubMed
description WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The overuse and misuse of antibiotics, especially for viral, and self‐limiting, respiratory tract infections such as sore throat, increases the risk of the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance within communities. Up to 80% of sore throat cases have a viral aetiology, and even when the infection is bacterial, most cases resolve without antibiotics. However, antibiotics are still frequently and often inappropriately prescribed for the treatment of sore throat. Furthermore, topical (local) antibiotics for treatment of sore throat are widely available over the counter. The objective of this systematic review was to establish the evidence for the benefits, risk of harm and antimicrobial resistance associated with topical (local) antibiotics used for patients with sore throat. METHODS: Eligible studies included those in patients with sore throat of any aetiology receiving the topical (local) antibiotics tyrothricin, bacitracin, gramicidin or neomycin where the antibiotic was topically/locally applied via the nasal cavity or throat. Nasal applications were included as these are occasionally used to treat upper respiratory tract infections that may involve sore throat. There was no restriction or requirement regarding comparator. The outcomes of interest included efficacy, safety, and in vitro culture and antimicrobial resistance data. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: This systematic review found sparse and mainly poor‐quality evidence relating to the use of topical (local) antibiotics for sore throat, and it was not possible to establish the benefits, risk of harm or impact of use on antimicrobial resistance. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: Further research is necessary to ascertain the risks and benefits of topical (local) antibiotics, their contribution to antimicrobial resistance and the risk of harm. We do, however, question whether it is appropriate and rational to use topical (local) antibiotics for the treatment of sore throat caused by respiratory tract infections in the absence of robust evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6899613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68996132019-12-19 Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective Essack, Sabiha Bell, John Burgoyne, Douglas S. Duerden, Martin Shephard, Adrian J Clin Pharm Ther Review Articles WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The overuse and misuse of antibiotics, especially for viral, and self‐limiting, respiratory tract infections such as sore throat, increases the risk of the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance within communities. Up to 80% of sore throat cases have a viral aetiology, and even when the infection is bacterial, most cases resolve without antibiotics. However, antibiotics are still frequently and often inappropriately prescribed for the treatment of sore throat. Furthermore, topical (local) antibiotics for treatment of sore throat are widely available over the counter. The objective of this systematic review was to establish the evidence for the benefits, risk of harm and antimicrobial resistance associated with topical (local) antibiotics used for patients with sore throat. METHODS: Eligible studies included those in patients with sore throat of any aetiology receiving the topical (local) antibiotics tyrothricin, bacitracin, gramicidin or neomycin where the antibiotic was topically/locally applied via the nasal cavity or throat. Nasal applications were included as these are occasionally used to treat upper respiratory tract infections that may involve sore throat. There was no restriction or requirement regarding comparator. The outcomes of interest included efficacy, safety, and in vitro culture and antimicrobial resistance data. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: This systematic review found sparse and mainly poor‐quality evidence relating to the use of topical (local) antibiotics for sore throat, and it was not possible to establish the benefits, risk of harm or impact of use on antimicrobial resistance. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: Further research is necessary to ascertain the risks and benefits of topical (local) antibiotics, their contribution to antimicrobial resistance and the risk of harm. We do, however, question whether it is appropriate and rational to use topical (local) antibiotics for the treatment of sore throat caused by respiratory tract infections in the absence of robust evidence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-13 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6899613/ /pubmed/31407824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13012 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Essack, Sabiha
Bell, John
Burgoyne, Douglas S.
Duerden, Martin
Shephard, Adrian
Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective
title Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective
title_full Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective
title_fullStr Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective
title_full_unstemmed Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective
title_short Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective
title_sort topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: an antibiotic stewardship perspective
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13012
work_keys_str_mv AT essacksabiha topicallocalantibioticsforrespiratoryinfectionswithsorethroatanantibioticstewardshipperspective
AT belljohn topicallocalantibioticsforrespiratoryinfectionswithsorethroatanantibioticstewardshipperspective
AT burgoynedouglass topicallocalantibioticsforrespiratoryinfectionswithsorethroatanantibioticstewardshipperspective
AT duerdenmartin topicallocalantibioticsforrespiratoryinfectionswithsorethroatanantibioticstewardshipperspective
AT shephardadrian topicallocalantibioticsforrespiratoryinfectionswithsorethroatanantibioticstewardshipperspective