Cargando…
Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The overuse and misuse of antibiotics, especially for viral, and self‐limiting, respiratory tract infections such as sore throat, increases the risk of the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance within communities. Up to 80% of sore throat cases have a viral...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13012 |
_version_ | 1783477169007099904 |
---|---|
author | Essack, Sabiha Bell, John Burgoyne, Douglas S. Duerden, Martin Shephard, Adrian |
author_facet | Essack, Sabiha Bell, John Burgoyne, Douglas S. Duerden, Martin Shephard, Adrian |
author_sort | Essack, Sabiha |
collection | PubMed |
description | WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The overuse and misuse of antibiotics, especially for viral, and self‐limiting, respiratory tract infections such as sore throat, increases the risk of the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance within communities. Up to 80% of sore throat cases have a viral aetiology, and even when the infection is bacterial, most cases resolve without antibiotics. However, antibiotics are still frequently and often inappropriately prescribed for the treatment of sore throat. Furthermore, topical (local) antibiotics for treatment of sore throat are widely available over the counter. The objective of this systematic review was to establish the evidence for the benefits, risk of harm and antimicrobial resistance associated with topical (local) antibiotics used for patients with sore throat. METHODS: Eligible studies included those in patients with sore throat of any aetiology receiving the topical (local) antibiotics tyrothricin, bacitracin, gramicidin or neomycin where the antibiotic was topically/locally applied via the nasal cavity or throat. Nasal applications were included as these are occasionally used to treat upper respiratory tract infections that may involve sore throat. There was no restriction or requirement regarding comparator. The outcomes of interest included efficacy, safety, and in vitro culture and antimicrobial resistance data. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: This systematic review found sparse and mainly poor‐quality evidence relating to the use of topical (local) antibiotics for sore throat, and it was not possible to establish the benefits, risk of harm or impact of use on antimicrobial resistance. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: Further research is necessary to ascertain the risks and benefits of topical (local) antibiotics, their contribution to antimicrobial resistance and the risk of harm. We do, however, question whether it is appropriate and rational to use topical (local) antibiotics for the treatment of sore throat caused by respiratory tract infections in the absence of robust evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6899613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68996132019-12-19 Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective Essack, Sabiha Bell, John Burgoyne, Douglas S. Duerden, Martin Shephard, Adrian J Clin Pharm Ther Review Articles WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The overuse and misuse of antibiotics, especially for viral, and self‐limiting, respiratory tract infections such as sore throat, increases the risk of the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance within communities. Up to 80% of sore throat cases have a viral aetiology, and even when the infection is bacterial, most cases resolve without antibiotics. However, antibiotics are still frequently and often inappropriately prescribed for the treatment of sore throat. Furthermore, topical (local) antibiotics for treatment of sore throat are widely available over the counter. The objective of this systematic review was to establish the evidence for the benefits, risk of harm and antimicrobial resistance associated with topical (local) antibiotics used for patients with sore throat. METHODS: Eligible studies included those in patients with sore throat of any aetiology receiving the topical (local) antibiotics tyrothricin, bacitracin, gramicidin or neomycin where the antibiotic was topically/locally applied via the nasal cavity or throat. Nasal applications were included as these are occasionally used to treat upper respiratory tract infections that may involve sore throat. There was no restriction or requirement regarding comparator. The outcomes of interest included efficacy, safety, and in vitro culture and antimicrobial resistance data. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: This systematic review found sparse and mainly poor‐quality evidence relating to the use of topical (local) antibiotics for sore throat, and it was not possible to establish the benefits, risk of harm or impact of use on antimicrobial resistance. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: Further research is necessary to ascertain the risks and benefits of topical (local) antibiotics, their contribution to antimicrobial resistance and the risk of harm. We do, however, question whether it is appropriate and rational to use topical (local) antibiotics for the treatment of sore throat caused by respiratory tract infections in the absence of robust evidence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-13 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6899613/ /pubmed/31407824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13012 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Essack, Sabiha Bell, John Burgoyne, Douglas S. Duerden, Martin Shephard, Adrian Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective |
title | Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective |
title_full | Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective |
title_fullStr | Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective |
title_short | Topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: An antibiotic stewardship perspective |
title_sort | topical (local) antibiotics for respiratory infections with sore throat: an antibiotic stewardship perspective |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT essacksabiha topicallocalantibioticsforrespiratoryinfectionswithsorethroatanantibioticstewardshipperspective AT belljohn topicallocalantibioticsforrespiratoryinfectionswithsorethroatanantibioticstewardshipperspective AT burgoynedouglass topicallocalantibioticsforrespiratoryinfectionswithsorethroatanantibioticstewardshipperspective AT duerdenmartin topicallocalantibioticsforrespiratoryinfectionswithsorethroatanantibioticstewardshipperspective AT shephardadrian topicallocalantibioticsforrespiratoryinfectionswithsorethroatanantibioticstewardshipperspective |