Cargando…
Comparison of Volumetric and Bead‐Based Counting of CD34 Cells by Single‐Platform Flow Cytometry
BACKGROUND: Over 2,000 people a year in the United Kingdom need a bone marrow or blood stem cell transplant. It is important to accurately quantify the hematopoietic stem cells to predict whether the transplant will be successful in replenishing the immune system. However, they are present at low fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30790450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21773 |
_version_ | 1783477169487347712 |
---|---|
author | Saraiva, Luisa Wang, Lili Kammel, Martin Kummrow, Andreas Atkinson, Eleanor Lee, Ji Youn Yalcinkaya, Burhanettin Akgöz, Muslum Höckner, Jana Ruf, Andreas Engel, Andrea Zhang, Yu‐Zhong O'Shea, Orla Sassi, Maria Paola Divieto, Carla Lekishvili, Tamara Campbell, Jonathan Liu, Yingying Wang, Jing Stebbings, Richard Gaigalas, Adolfas K. Rigsby, Peter Neukammer, Jörg Vessillier, Sandrine |
author_facet | Saraiva, Luisa Wang, Lili Kammel, Martin Kummrow, Andreas Atkinson, Eleanor Lee, Ji Youn Yalcinkaya, Burhanettin Akgöz, Muslum Höckner, Jana Ruf, Andreas Engel, Andrea Zhang, Yu‐Zhong O'Shea, Orla Sassi, Maria Paola Divieto, Carla Lekishvili, Tamara Campbell, Jonathan Liu, Yingying Wang, Jing Stebbings, Richard Gaigalas, Adolfas K. Rigsby, Peter Neukammer, Jörg Vessillier, Sandrine |
author_sort | Saraiva, Luisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Over 2,000 people a year in the United Kingdom need a bone marrow or blood stem cell transplant. It is important to accurately quantify the hematopoietic stem cells to predict whether the transplant will be successful in replenishing the immune system. However, they are present at low frequency, which complicates accurate quantification. The current gold standard method is single‐platform flow cytometry using internal reference counting beads to determine the concentration of CD34 cells. However, volumetric flow cytometers have the ability to measure the acquisition volume, which removes the need for reference beads for calculation of cell concentrations. METHOD: In this study, we compared both methods for calculating CD34 cell concentrations in volumetric cytometers, using either the volume reading or the number of reference beads for calculation. In addition, the uncertainty of measurement for each method was estimated. RESULTS: The results show that both methods have similar uncertainties of measurement. Regression analysis showed low to no statistical difference in CD34 cell concentrations obtained with each method. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study suggests that the volumetric method is a valid approach but that the adoption of this technology may be hindered without some form of external calibration of volume readings to increase confidence in the measurement. © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Clinical Cytometry Society. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6899615 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68996152019-12-19 Comparison of Volumetric and Bead‐Based Counting of CD34 Cells by Single‐Platform Flow Cytometry Saraiva, Luisa Wang, Lili Kammel, Martin Kummrow, Andreas Atkinson, Eleanor Lee, Ji Youn Yalcinkaya, Burhanettin Akgöz, Muslum Höckner, Jana Ruf, Andreas Engel, Andrea Zhang, Yu‐Zhong O'Shea, Orla Sassi, Maria Paola Divieto, Carla Lekishvili, Tamara Campbell, Jonathan Liu, Yingying Wang, Jing Stebbings, Richard Gaigalas, Adolfas K. Rigsby, Peter Neukammer, Jörg Vessillier, Sandrine Cytometry B Clin Cytom Original Articles BACKGROUND: Over 2,000 people a year in the United Kingdom need a bone marrow or blood stem cell transplant. It is important to accurately quantify the hematopoietic stem cells to predict whether the transplant will be successful in replenishing the immune system. However, they are present at low frequency, which complicates accurate quantification. The current gold standard method is single‐platform flow cytometry using internal reference counting beads to determine the concentration of CD34 cells. However, volumetric flow cytometers have the ability to measure the acquisition volume, which removes the need for reference beads for calculation of cell concentrations. METHOD: In this study, we compared both methods for calculating CD34 cell concentrations in volumetric cytometers, using either the volume reading or the number of reference beads for calculation. In addition, the uncertainty of measurement for each method was estimated. RESULTS: The results show that both methods have similar uncertainties of measurement. Regression analysis showed low to no statistical difference in CD34 cell concentrations obtained with each method. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study suggests that the volumetric method is a valid approach but that the adoption of this technology may be hindered without some form of external calibration of volume readings to increase confidence in the measurement. © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Clinical Cytometry Society. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-02-20 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6899615/ /pubmed/30790450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21773 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Clinical Cytometry Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Saraiva, Luisa Wang, Lili Kammel, Martin Kummrow, Andreas Atkinson, Eleanor Lee, Ji Youn Yalcinkaya, Burhanettin Akgöz, Muslum Höckner, Jana Ruf, Andreas Engel, Andrea Zhang, Yu‐Zhong O'Shea, Orla Sassi, Maria Paola Divieto, Carla Lekishvili, Tamara Campbell, Jonathan Liu, Yingying Wang, Jing Stebbings, Richard Gaigalas, Adolfas K. Rigsby, Peter Neukammer, Jörg Vessillier, Sandrine Comparison of Volumetric and Bead‐Based Counting of CD34 Cells by Single‐Platform Flow Cytometry |
title | Comparison of Volumetric and Bead‐Based Counting of CD34 Cells by Single‐Platform Flow Cytometry |
title_full | Comparison of Volumetric and Bead‐Based Counting of CD34 Cells by Single‐Platform Flow Cytometry |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Volumetric and Bead‐Based Counting of CD34 Cells by Single‐Platform Flow Cytometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Volumetric and Bead‐Based Counting of CD34 Cells by Single‐Platform Flow Cytometry |
title_short | Comparison of Volumetric and Bead‐Based Counting of CD34 Cells by Single‐Platform Flow Cytometry |
title_sort | comparison of volumetric and bead‐based counting of cd34 cells by single‐platform flow cytometry |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899615/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30790450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21773 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saraivaluisa comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT wanglili comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT kammelmartin comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT kummrowandreas comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT atkinsoneleanor comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT leejiyoun comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT yalcinkayaburhanettin comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT akgozmuslum comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT hocknerjana comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT rufandreas comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT engelandrea comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT zhangyuzhong comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT osheaorla comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT sassimariapaola comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT divietocarla comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT lekishvilitamara comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT campbelljonathan comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT liuyingying comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT wangjing comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT stebbingsrichard comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT gaigalasadolfask comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT rigsbypeter comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT neukammerjorg comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry AT vessilliersandrine comparisonofvolumetricandbeadbasedcountingofcd34cellsbysingleplatformflowcytometry |