Cargando…
Global marine redox changes drove the rise and fall of the Ediacara biota
The role of O(2) in the evolution of early animals, as represented by some members of the Ediacara biota, has been heavily debated because current geochemical evidence paints a conflicting picture regarding global marine O(2) levels during key intervals of the rise and fall of the Ediacara biota. Fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31353777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12359 |
_version_ | 1783477186479521792 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Feifei Xiao, Shuhai Romaniello, Stephen J. Hardisty, Dalton Li, Chao Melezhik, Victor Pokrovsky, Boris Cheng, Meng Shi, Wei Lenton, Timothy M. Anbar, Ariel D. |
author_facet | Zhang, Feifei Xiao, Shuhai Romaniello, Stephen J. Hardisty, Dalton Li, Chao Melezhik, Victor Pokrovsky, Boris Cheng, Meng Shi, Wei Lenton, Timothy M. Anbar, Ariel D. |
author_sort | Zhang, Feifei |
collection | PubMed |
description | The role of O(2) in the evolution of early animals, as represented by some members of the Ediacara biota, has been heavily debated because current geochemical evidence paints a conflicting picture regarding global marine O(2) levels during key intervals of the rise and fall of the Ediacara biota. Fossil evidence indicates that the diversification the Ediacara biota occurred during or shortly after the Ediacaran Shuram negative C‐isotope Excursion (SE), which is often interpreted to reflect ocean oxygenation. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding ocean oxygen levels during the SE and the middle Ediacaran Period. To help resolve this debate, we examined U isotope variations (δ(238)U) in three carbonate sections from South China, Siberia, and USA that record the SE. The δ(238)U data from all three sections are in excellent agreement and reveal the largest positive shift in δ(238)U ever reported in the geologic record (from ~ −0.74‰ to ~ −0.26‰). Quantitative modeling of these data suggests that the global ocean switched from a largely anoxic state (26%–100% of the seafloor overlain by anoxic waters) to near‐modern levels of ocean oxygenation during the SE. This episode of ocean oxygenation is broadly coincident with the rise of the Ediacara biota. Following this initial radiation, the Ediacara biota persisted until the terminal Ediacaran period, when recently published U isotope data indicate a return to more widespread ocean anoxia. Taken together, it appears that global marine redox changes drove the rise and fall of the Ediacara biota. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6899691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68996912019-12-19 Global marine redox changes drove the rise and fall of the Ediacara biota Zhang, Feifei Xiao, Shuhai Romaniello, Stephen J. Hardisty, Dalton Li, Chao Melezhik, Victor Pokrovsky, Boris Cheng, Meng Shi, Wei Lenton, Timothy M. Anbar, Ariel D. Geobiology Original Articles The role of O(2) in the evolution of early animals, as represented by some members of the Ediacara biota, has been heavily debated because current geochemical evidence paints a conflicting picture regarding global marine O(2) levels during key intervals of the rise and fall of the Ediacara biota. Fossil evidence indicates that the diversification the Ediacara biota occurred during or shortly after the Ediacaran Shuram negative C‐isotope Excursion (SE), which is often interpreted to reflect ocean oxygenation. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding ocean oxygen levels during the SE and the middle Ediacaran Period. To help resolve this debate, we examined U isotope variations (δ(238)U) in three carbonate sections from South China, Siberia, and USA that record the SE. The δ(238)U data from all three sections are in excellent agreement and reveal the largest positive shift in δ(238)U ever reported in the geologic record (from ~ −0.74‰ to ~ −0.26‰). Quantitative modeling of these data suggests that the global ocean switched from a largely anoxic state (26%–100% of the seafloor overlain by anoxic waters) to near‐modern levels of ocean oxygenation during the SE. This episode of ocean oxygenation is broadly coincident with the rise of the Ediacara biota. Following this initial radiation, the Ediacara biota persisted until the terminal Ediacaran period, when recently published U isotope data indicate a return to more widespread ocean anoxia. Taken together, it appears that global marine redox changes drove the rise and fall of the Ediacara biota. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-28 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6899691/ /pubmed/31353777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12359 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Geobiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Zhang, Feifei Xiao, Shuhai Romaniello, Stephen J. Hardisty, Dalton Li, Chao Melezhik, Victor Pokrovsky, Boris Cheng, Meng Shi, Wei Lenton, Timothy M. Anbar, Ariel D. Global marine redox changes drove the rise and fall of the Ediacara biota |
title | Global marine redox changes drove the rise and fall of the Ediacara biota |
title_full | Global marine redox changes drove the rise and fall of the Ediacara biota |
title_fullStr | Global marine redox changes drove the rise and fall of the Ediacara biota |
title_full_unstemmed | Global marine redox changes drove the rise and fall of the Ediacara biota |
title_short | Global marine redox changes drove the rise and fall of the Ediacara biota |
title_sort | global marine redox changes drove the rise and fall of the ediacara biota |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31353777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gbi.12359 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangfeifei globalmarineredoxchangesdrovetheriseandfalloftheediacarabiota AT xiaoshuhai globalmarineredoxchangesdrovetheriseandfalloftheediacarabiota AT romaniellostephenj globalmarineredoxchangesdrovetheriseandfalloftheediacarabiota AT hardistydalton globalmarineredoxchangesdrovetheriseandfalloftheediacarabiota AT lichao globalmarineredoxchangesdrovetheriseandfalloftheediacarabiota AT melezhikvictor globalmarineredoxchangesdrovetheriseandfalloftheediacarabiota AT pokrovskyboris globalmarineredoxchangesdrovetheriseandfalloftheediacarabiota AT chengmeng globalmarineredoxchangesdrovetheriseandfalloftheediacarabiota AT shiwei globalmarineredoxchangesdrovetheriseandfalloftheediacarabiota AT lentontimothym globalmarineredoxchangesdrovetheriseandfalloftheediacarabiota AT anbararield globalmarineredoxchangesdrovetheriseandfalloftheediacarabiota |