Cargando…

Superior efficacy with a fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with insulin degludec and liraglutide in insulin‐naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, open‐label, randomized trial

AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with its individual components in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled on an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This 52‐week, open‐label, multicentre, treat‐to‐target...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaku, Kohei, Araki, Eiichi, Tanizawa, Yukio, Ross Agner, Bue, Nishida, Tomoyuki, Ranthe, Mattis, Inagaki, Nobuya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13856
_version_ 1783477210027393024
author Kaku, Kohei
Araki, Eiichi
Tanizawa, Yukio
Ross Agner, Bue
Nishida, Tomoyuki
Ranthe, Mattis
Inagaki, Nobuya
author_facet Kaku, Kohei
Araki, Eiichi
Tanizawa, Yukio
Ross Agner, Bue
Nishida, Tomoyuki
Ranthe, Mattis
Inagaki, Nobuya
author_sort Kaku, Kohei
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with its individual components in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled on an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This 52‐week, open‐label, multicentre, treat‐to‐target trial randomized participants (n = 819) 1:1:1 to IDegLira, liraglutide 1.8 mg or degludec, as add‐on to their pre‐trial OAD. The maximum IDegLira dose was 50 dose steps (50 U degludec/1.8 mg liraglutide), there was no maximum dose for degludec, and both were titrated based on individual blood glucose measurements. RESULTS: After 52 weeks, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) decreased by 26 mmol/mol with IDegLira vs 20 mmol/mol with degludec and liraglutide: estimated treatment differences were −6.91 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval [CI] –8.18; −5.64) and −5.30 mmol/mol (95% CI −6.58; −4.03), confirming non‐inferiority of IDegLira to degludec and superiority of IDegLira to liraglutide (P < .0001 for both [primary endpoint]). Mean body weight changes were 2.9 kg, 4.1 kg and −1.0 kg with IDegLira, degludec and liraglutide, respectively, showing superiority of IDegLira versus degludec (P = .0001), but a significant difference in favour of liraglutide (P < .0001). Rates of severe or blood glucose‐confirmed hypoglycaemia for IDegLira were lower versus degludec (rate ratio 0.48 [95% CI 0.35; 0.68]; P < .0001), but higher versus liraglutide (rate ratio 37.58 [95% CI 19.80; 71.31]; P < .0001). Mean daily total insulin dose was lower with IDegLira (27.7 U) versus degludec (34.8 U; P < .0001). Overall adverse event (AE) rates were similar. In total, 34.9%, 22.9% and 41.8% of IDegLira‐, degludec‐ and liraglutide‐treated participants experienced gastrointestinal AEs. CONCLUSION: IDegLira was superior to degludec and liraglutide in terms of HbA1c reduction and superior to degludec in terms of body weight change and rates of hypoglycaemia in Japanese people with T2D.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6899795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68997952019-12-19 Superior efficacy with a fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with insulin degludec and liraglutide in insulin‐naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, open‐label, randomized trial Kaku, Kohei Araki, Eiichi Tanizawa, Yukio Ross Agner, Bue Nishida, Tomoyuki Ranthe, Mattis Inagaki, Nobuya Diabetes Obes Metab Original Articles AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with its individual components in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled on an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This 52‐week, open‐label, multicentre, treat‐to‐target trial randomized participants (n = 819) 1:1:1 to IDegLira, liraglutide 1.8 mg or degludec, as add‐on to their pre‐trial OAD. The maximum IDegLira dose was 50 dose steps (50 U degludec/1.8 mg liraglutide), there was no maximum dose for degludec, and both were titrated based on individual blood glucose measurements. RESULTS: After 52 weeks, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) decreased by 26 mmol/mol with IDegLira vs 20 mmol/mol with degludec and liraglutide: estimated treatment differences were −6.91 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval [CI] –8.18; −5.64) and −5.30 mmol/mol (95% CI −6.58; −4.03), confirming non‐inferiority of IDegLira to degludec and superiority of IDegLira to liraglutide (P < .0001 for both [primary endpoint]). Mean body weight changes were 2.9 kg, 4.1 kg and −1.0 kg with IDegLira, degludec and liraglutide, respectively, showing superiority of IDegLira versus degludec (P = .0001), but a significant difference in favour of liraglutide (P < .0001). Rates of severe or blood glucose‐confirmed hypoglycaemia for IDegLira were lower versus degludec (rate ratio 0.48 [95% CI 0.35; 0.68]; P < .0001), but higher versus liraglutide (rate ratio 37.58 [95% CI 19.80; 71.31]; P < .0001). Mean daily total insulin dose was lower with IDegLira (27.7 U) versus degludec (34.8 U; P < .0001). Overall adverse event (AE) rates were similar. In total, 34.9%, 22.9% and 41.8% of IDegLira‐, degludec‐ and liraglutide‐treated participants experienced gastrointestinal AEs. CONCLUSION: IDegLira was superior to degludec and liraglutide in terms of HbA1c reduction and superior to degludec in terms of body weight change and rates of hypoglycaemia in Japanese people with T2D. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-08-28 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6899795/ /pubmed/31407845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13856 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kaku, Kohei
Araki, Eiichi
Tanizawa, Yukio
Ross Agner, Bue
Nishida, Tomoyuki
Ranthe, Mattis
Inagaki, Nobuya
Superior efficacy with a fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with insulin degludec and liraglutide in insulin‐naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, open‐label, randomized trial
title Superior efficacy with a fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with insulin degludec and liraglutide in insulin‐naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, open‐label, randomized trial
title_full Superior efficacy with a fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with insulin degludec and liraglutide in insulin‐naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, open‐label, randomized trial
title_fullStr Superior efficacy with a fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with insulin degludec and liraglutide in insulin‐naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, open‐label, randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Superior efficacy with a fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with insulin degludec and liraglutide in insulin‐naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, open‐label, randomized trial
title_short Superior efficacy with a fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with insulin degludec and liraglutide in insulin‐naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, open‐label, randomized trial
title_sort superior efficacy with a fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (ideglira) compared with insulin degludec and liraglutide in insulin‐naïve japanese patients with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, open‐label, randomized trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31407845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13856
work_keys_str_mv AT kakukohei superiorefficacywithafixedratiocombinationofinsulindegludecandliraglutideidegliracomparedwithinsulindegludecandliraglutideininsulinnaivejapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesinaphase3openlabelrandomizedtrial
AT arakieiichi superiorefficacywithafixedratiocombinationofinsulindegludecandliraglutideidegliracomparedwithinsulindegludecandliraglutideininsulinnaivejapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesinaphase3openlabelrandomizedtrial
AT tanizawayukio superiorefficacywithafixedratiocombinationofinsulindegludecandliraglutideidegliracomparedwithinsulindegludecandliraglutideininsulinnaivejapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesinaphase3openlabelrandomizedtrial
AT rossagnerbue superiorefficacywithafixedratiocombinationofinsulindegludecandliraglutideidegliracomparedwithinsulindegludecandliraglutideininsulinnaivejapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesinaphase3openlabelrandomizedtrial
AT nishidatomoyuki superiorefficacywithafixedratiocombinationofinsulindegludecandliraglutideidegliracomparedwithinsulindegludecandliraglutideininsulinnaivejapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesinaphase3openlabelrandomizedtrial
AT ranthemattis superiorefficacywithafixedratiocombinationofinsulindegludecandliraglutideidegliracomparedwithinsulindegludecandliraglutideininsulinnaivejapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesinaphase3openlabelrandomizedtrial
AT inagakinobuya superiorefficacywithafixedratiocombinationofinsulindegludecandliraglutideidegliracomparedwithinsulindegludecandliraglutideininsulinnaivejapanesepatientswithtype2diabetesinaphase3openlabelrandomizedtrial