Cargando…

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in a hospital wristband

BACKGROUND: 1,6‐Hexanediol diacrylate (1,6‐HDDA) is a multifunctional acrylate and a potent sensitizer. OBJECTIVES: To report a case of allergic contact dermatitis caused by 1,6‐HDDA in a hospital wristband. METHODS: A male patient presented with eczema on his wrist where he had worn a hospital wris...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Amerongen, Cynthia C. A., Dahlin, Jakob, Isaksson, Marléne, Schuttelaar, Marie L. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13378
_version_ 1783477227773493248
author van Amerongen, Cynthia C. A.
Dahlin, Jakob
Isaksson, Marléne
Schuttelaar, Marie L. A.
author_facet van Amerongen, Cynthia C. A.
Dahlin, Jakob
Isaksson, Marléne
Schuttelaar, Marie L. A.
author_sort van Amerongen, Cynthia C. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: 1,6‐Hexanediol diacrylate (1,6‐HDDA) is a multifunctional acrylate and a potent sensitizer. OBJECTIVES: To report a case of allergic contact dermatitis caused by 1,6‐HDDA in a hospital wristband. METHODS: A male patient presented with eczema on his wrist where he had worn a hospital wristband. Patch testing was performed with our extended European baseline series, additional series, and pieces of the hospital wristband. Thin‐layer chromatography (TLC) was performed with extracts from the wristband and gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry was used for chemical analysis. RESULTS: Positive reactions were found to pieces of the wristband, including adhesive rim (+++), inside (+++), and outside (++); to multiple allergens in the (meth)acrylates series; and to extracts of the wristband in acetone and ethanol. Chemical analysis of the ethanol extract showed presence of lauryl acrylate and 1,6‐HDDA. Patch testing with TLC strips and subsequent chemical analysis showed that the substance causing the strongest reaction was 1,6‐HDDA, to which the patient had a confirmed positive patch test reaction. CONCLUSION: 1,6‐HDDA was identified as the culprit allergen responsible for allergic contact dermatitis caused by the hospital wristband.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6899871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68998712019-12-19 Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in a hospital wristband van Amerongen, Cynthia C. A. Dahlin, Jakob Isaksson, Marléne Schuttelaar, Marie L. A. Contact Dermatitis Original Articles BACKGROUND: 1,6‐Hexanediol diacrylate (1,6‐HDDA) is a multifunctional acrylate and a potent sensitizer. OBJECTIVES: To report a case of allergic contact dermatitis caused by 1,6‐HDDA in a hospital wristband. METHODS: A male patient presented with eczema on his wrist where he had worn a hospital wristband. Patch testing was performed with our extended European baseline series, additional series, and pieces of the hospital wristband. Thin‐layer chromatography (TLC) was performed with extracts from the wristband and gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry was used for chemical analysis. RESULTS: Positive reactions were found to pieces of the wristband, including adhesive rim (+++), inside (+++), and outside (++); to multiple allergens in the (meth)acrylates series; and to extracts of the wristband in acetone and ethanol. Chemical analysis of the ethanol extract showed presence of lauryl acrylate and 1,6‐HDDA. Patch testing with TLC strips and subsequent chemical analysis showed that the substance causing the strongest reaction was 1,6‐HDDA, to which the patient had a confirmed positive patch test reaction. CONCLUSION: 1,6‐HDDA was identified as the culprit allergen responsible for allergic contact dermatitis caused by the hospital wristband. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-08-28 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6899871/ /pubmed/31392731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13378 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
van Amerongen, Cynthia C. A.
Dahlin, Jakob
Isaksson, Marléne
Schuttelaar, Marie L. A.
Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in a hospital wristband
title Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in a hospital wristband
title_full Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in a hospital wristband
title_fullStr Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in a hospital wristband
title_full_unstemmed Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in a hospital wristband
title_short Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in a hospital wristband
title_sort allergic contact dermatitis caused by 1,6‐hexanediol diacrylate in a hospital wristband
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13378
work_keys_str_mv AT vanamerongencynthiaca allergiccontactdermatitiscausedby16hexanedioldiacrylateinahospitalwristband
AT dahlinjakob allergiccontactdermatitiscausedby16hexanedioldiacrylateinahospitalwristband
AT isakssonmarlene allergiccontactdermatitiscausedby16hexanedioldiacrylateinahospitalwristband
AT schuttelaarmariela allergiccontactdermatitiscausedby16hexanedioldiacrylateinahospitalwristband