Cargando…
The time course of ineffective sham‐blinding during low‐intensity (1 mA) transcranial direct current stimulation
Studies using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) typically compare an active protocol relative to a shorter sham (placebo) protocol. Both protocols are presumed to be perceptually identical on the scalp, and thus represent an effective method of delivering double‐blinded experimental des...
Autores principales: | Greinacher, Robert, Buhôt, Larissa, Möller, Lisa, Learmonth, Gemma |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31228880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14497 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is the “end‐of‐study guess” a valid measure of sham blinding during transcranial direct current stimulation?
por: Turner, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and language
por: Monti, Alessia, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
The effect of oppositional parietal transcranial direct current stimulation on lateralized brain functions
por: Li, Lucia M., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Perceived Comfort and Blinding Efficacy in Randomised Sham-Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Trials at 2 mA in Young and Older Healthy Adults
por: Wallace, Denise, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Rethinking Clinical Trials of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Participant and Assessor Blinding Is Inadequate at Intensities of 2mA
por: O’Connell, Neil E., et al.
Publicado: (2012)