Cargando…
Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach
OBJECTIVE: Patients diagnosed with advanced larynx cancer face a decisional process in which they can choose between radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or a total laryngectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy. Clinicians do not always agree on the best clinical treatment, making the decisional process for p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30663068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27800 |
_version_ | 1783477228960481280 |
---|---|
author | Petersen, Japke F. Berlanga, Adriana Stuiver, Martijn M. Hamming‐Vrieze, Olga Hoebers, Frank Lambin, Philippe van den Brekel, Michiel W.M. |
author_facet | Petersen, Japke F. Berlanga, Adriana Stuiver, Martijn M. Hamming‐Vrieze, Olga Hoebers, Frank Lambin, Philippe van den Brekel, Michiel W.M. |
author_sort | Petersen, Japke F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Patients diagnosed with advanced larynx cancer face a decisional process in which they can choose between radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or a total laryngectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy. Clinicians do not always agree on the best clinical treatment, making the decisional process for patients a complex problem. METHODS: Guided by the International Patient Decision Aid (PDA) Standards, we followed three developmental phases for which we held semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with patients and physicians, thinking‐out‐loud sessions, and a study‐specific questionnaire. Audio‐recorded interviews were verbatim transcribed, thematically coded, and analyzed. Phase 1 consisted of an evaluation of the decisional needs and the regular counseling process; phase 2 tested the comprehensibility and usability of the PDA; and phase 3 beta tested the feasibility of the PDA. RESULTS: Patients and doctors agreed on the need for development of a PDA. Major revisions were conducted after phase 1 to improve the readability and replace the majority of text with video animations. Patients and physicians considered the PDA to be a major improvement to the current counseling process. CONCLUSION: This study describes the development of a comprehensible and easy‐to‐use online patient decision aid for advanced larynx cancer, which was found satisfactory by patients and physicians (available on http://www.treatmentchoice.info). The outcome of the interviews underscores the need for better patient counseling. The feasibility and satisfaction among newly diagnosed patients as well as doctors will need to be proven. To this end, we started a multicenter trial evaluating the PDA in clinical practice (http://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03292341). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 129:2733–2739, 2019 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6899876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68998762019-12-19 Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach Petersen, Japke F. Berlanga, Adriana Stuiver, Martijn M. Hamming‐Vrieze, Olga Hoebers, Frank Lambin, Philippe van den Brekel, Michiel W.M. Laryngoscope Head and Neck OBJECTIVE: Patients diagnosed with advanced larynx cancer face a decisional process in which they can choose between radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or a total laryngectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy. Clinicians do not always agree on the best clinical treatment, making the decisional process for patients a complex problem. METHODS: Guided by the International Patient Decision Aid (PDA) Standards, we followed three developmental phases for which we held semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with patients and physicians, thinking‐out‐loud sessions, and a study‐specific questionnaire. Audio‐recorded interviews were verbatim transcribed, thematically coded, and analyzed. Phase 1 consisted of an evaluation of the decisional needs and the regular counseling process; phase 2 tested the comprehensibility and usability of the PDA; and phase 3 beta tested the feasibility of the PDA. RESULTS: Patients and doctors agreed on the need for development of a PDA. Major revisions were conducted after phase 1 to improve the readability and replace the majority of text with video animations. Patients and physicians considered the PDA to be a major improvement to the current counseling process. CONCLUSION: This study describes the development of a comprehensible and easy‐to‐use online patient decision aid for advanced larynx cancer, which was found satisfactory by patients and physicians (available on http://www.treatmentchoice.info). The outcome of the interviews underscores the need for better patient counseling. The feasibility and satisfaction among newly diagnosed patients as well as doctors will need to be proven. To this end, we started a multicenter trial evaluating the PDA in clinical practice (http://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03292341). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 129:2733–2739, 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-01-21 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6899876/ /pubmed/30663068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27800 Text en © 2019 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Head and Neck Petersen, Japke F. Berlanga, Adriana Stuiver, Martijn M. Hamming‐Vrieze, Olga Hoebers, Frank Lambin, Philippe van den Brekel, Michiel W.M. Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach |
title | Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach |
title_full | Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach |
title_fullStr | Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach |
title_short | Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach |
title_sort | improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: a mixed methods approach |
topic | Head and Neck |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30663068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27800 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersenjapkef improvingdecisionmakinginlarynxcancerbydevelopingadecisionaidamixedmethodsapproach AT berlangaadriana improvingdecisionmakinginlarynxcancerbydevelopingadecisionaidamixedmethodsapproach AT stuivermartijnm improvingdecisionmakinginlarynxcancerbydevelopingadecisionaidamixedmethodsapproach AT hammingvriezeolga improvingdecisionmakinginlarynxcancerbydevelopingadecisionaidamixedmethodsapproach AT hoebersfrank improvingdecisionmakinginlarynxcancerbydevelopingadecisionaidamixedmethodsapproach AT lambinphilippe improvingdecisionmakinginlarynxcancerbydevelopingadecisionaidamixedmethodsapproach AT vandenbrekelmichielwm improvingdecisionmakinginlarynxcancerbydevelopingadecisionaidamixedmethodsapproach |