Cargando…

Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach

OBJECTIVE: Patients diagnosed with advanced larynx cancer face a decisional process in which they can choose between radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or a total laryngectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy. Clinicians do not always agree on the best clinical treatment, making the decisional process for p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petersen, Japke F., Berlanga, Adriana, Stuiver, Martijn M., Hamming‐Vrieze, Olga, Hoebers, Frank, Lambin, Philippe, van den Brekel, Michiel W.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30663068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27800
_version_ 1783477228960481280
author Petersen, Japke F.
Berlanga, Adriana
Stuiver, Martijn M.
Hamming‐Vrieze, Olga
Hoebers, Frank
Lambin, Philippe
van den Brekel, Michiel W.M.
author_facet Petersen, Japke F.
Berlanga, Adriana
Stuiver, Martijn M.
Hamming‐Vrieze, Olga
Hoebers, Frank
Lambin, Philippe
van den Brekel, Michiel W.M.
author_sort Petersen, Japke F.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Patients diagnosed with advanced larynx cancer face a decisional process in which they can choose between radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or a total laryngectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy. Clinicians do not always agree on the best clinical treatment, making the decisional process for patients a complex problem. METHODS: Guided by the International Patient Decision Aid (PDA) Standards, we followed three developmental phases for which we held semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with patients and physicians, thinking‐out‐loud sessions, and a study‐specific questionnaire. Audio‐recorded interviews were verbatim transcribed, thematically coded, and analyzed. Phase 1 consisted of an evaluation of the decisional needs and the regular counseling process; phase 2 tested the comprehensibility and usability of the PDA; and phase 3 beta tested the feasibility of the PDA. RESULTS: Patients and doctors agreed on the need for development of a PDA. Major revisions were conducted after phase 1 to improve the readability and replace the majority of text with video animations. Patients and physicians considered the PDA to be a major improvement to the current counseling process. CONCLUSION: This study describes the development of a comprehensible and easy‐to‐use online patient decision aid for advanced larynx cancer, which was found satisfactory by patients and physicians (available on http://www.treatmentchoice.info). The outcome of the interviews underscores the need for better patient counseling. The feasibility and satisfaction among newly diagnosed patients as well as doctors will need to be proven. To this end, we started a multicenter trial evaluating the PDA in clinical practice (http://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03292341). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 129:2733–2739, 2019
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6899876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68998762019-12-19 Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach Petersen, Japke F. Berlanga, Adriana Stuiver, Martijn M. Hamming‐Vrieze, Olga Hoebers, Frank Lambin, Philippe van den Brekel, Michiel W.M. Laryngoscope Head and Neck OBJECTIVE: Patients diagnosed with advanced larynx cancer face a decisional process in which they can choose between radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or a total laryngectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy. Clinicians do not always agree on the best clinical treatment, making the decisional process for patients a complex problem. METHODS: Guided by the International Patient Decision Aid (PDA) Standards, we followed three developmental phases for which we held semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with patients and physicians, thinking‐out‐loud sessions, and a study‐specific questionnaire. Audio‐recorded interviews were verbatim transcribed, thematically coded, and analyzed. Phase 1 consisted of an evaluation of the decisional needs and the regular counseling process; phase 2 tested the comprehensibility and usability of the PDA; and phase 3 beta tested the feasibility of the PDA. RESULTS: Patients and doctors agreed on the need for development of a PDA. Major revisions were conducted after phase 1 to improve the readability and replace the majority of text with video animations. Patients and physicians considered the PDA to be a major improvement to the current counseling process. CONCLUSION: This study describes the development of a comprehensible and easy‐to‐use online patient decision aid for advanced larynx cancer, which was found satisfactory by patients and physicians (available on http://www.treatmentchoice.info). The outcome of the interviews underscores the need for better patient counseling. The feasibility and satisfaction among newly diagnosed patients as well as doctors will need to be proven. To this end, we started a multicenter trial evaluating the PDA in clinical practice (http://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03292341). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 129:2733–2739, 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-01-21 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6899876/ /pubmed/30663068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27800 Text en © 2019 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Head and Neck
Petersen, Japke F.
Berlanga, Adriana
Stuiver, Martijn M.
Hamming‐Vrieze, Olga
Hoebers, Frank
Lambin, Philippe
van den Brekel, Michiel W.M.
Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach
title Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach
title_full Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach
title_fullStr Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach
title_full_unstemmed Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach
title_short Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach
title_sort improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: a mixed methods approach
topic Head and Neck
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30663068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27800
work_keys_str_mv AT petersenjapkef improvingdecisionmakinginlarynxcancerbydevelopingadecisionaidamixedmethodsapproach
AT berlangaadriana improvingdecisionmakinginlarynxcancerbydevelopingadecisionaidamixedmethodsapproach
AT stuivermartijnm improvingdecisionmakinginlarynxcancerbydevelopingadecisionaidamixedmethodsapproach
AT hammingvriezeolga improvingdecisionmakinginlarynxcancerbydevelopingadecisionaidamixedmethodsapproach
AT hoebersfrank improvingdecisionmakinginlarynxcancerbydevelopingadecisionaidamixedmethodsapproach
AT lambinphilippe improvingdecisionmakinginlarynxcancerbydevelopingadecisionaidamixedmethodsapproach
AT vandenbrekelmichielwm improvingdecisionmakinginlarynxcancerbydevelopingadecisionaidamixedmethodsapproach