Cargando…
Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review
OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate evidence against male circumcision (MC). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. RESULTS: Database searches retrieved 297 publications for inclusion. Bibliographies of these yielded 101 more. After evaluation we found: Claims...
Autores principales: | Morris, Brian J, Moreton, Stephen, Krieger, John N |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31496128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12361 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Critical evaluation of contrasting evidence on whether male circumcision has adverse psychological effects: A systematic review
por: Morris, Brian J., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Infant Circumcision for Sexually Transmitted Infection Risk Reduction Globally
por: Morris, Brian J., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Does Male Circumcision Protect against Sexually Transmitted Infections? Arguments and Meta-Analyses to the Contrary Fail to Withstand Scrutiny
por: Morris, Brian J., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
The Contrasting Evidence Concerning the Effect of Male Circumcision on Sexual Function, Sensation, and Pleasure: A Systematic Review
por: Morris, Brian J., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Re: The medical evidence on non-therapeutic circumcision of infants and boys—setting the record straight
por: Morris, Brian J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)