Cargando…

Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study

Donor‐derived cell‐free DNA (dd‐cfDNA) is a noninvasive biomarker for comprehensive monitoring of allograft injury and rejection in kidney transplantation (KTx). dd‐cfDNA quantification of copies/mL plasma (dd‐cfDNA[cp/mL]) was compared to dd‐cfDNA fraction (dd‐cfDNA[%]) at prespecified visits in 18...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oellerich, Michael, Shipkova, Maria, Asendorf, Thomas, Walson, Philip D., Schauerte, Verena, Mettenmeyer, Nina, Kabakchiev, Mariana, Hasche, Georg, Gröne, Hermann‐Josef, Friede, Tim, Wieland, Eberhard, Schwenger, Vedat, Schütz, Ekkehard, Beck, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31062511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15416
_version_ 1783477243202240512
author Oellerich, Michael
Shipkova, Maria
Asendorf, Thomas
Walson, Philip D.
Schauerte, Verena
Mettenmeyer, Nina
Kabakchiev, Mariana
Hasche, Georg
Gröne, Hermann‐Josef
Friede, Tim
Wieland, Eberhard
Schwenger, Vedat
Schütz, Ekkehard
Beck, Julia
author_facet Oellerich, Michael
Shipkova, Maria
Asendorf, Thomas
Walson, Philip D.
Schauerte, Verena
Mettenmeyer, Nina
Kabakchiev, Mariana
Hasche, Georg
Gröne, Hermann‐Josef
Friede, Tim
Wieland, Eberhard
Schwenger, Vedat
Schütz, Ekkehard
Beck, Julia
author_sort Oellerich, Michael
collection PubMed
description Donor‐derived cell‐free DNA (dd‐cfDNA) is a noninvasive biomarker for comprehensive monitoring of allograft injury and rejection in kidney transplantation (KTx). dd‐cfDNA quantification of copies/mL plasma (dd‐cfDNA[cp/mL]) was compared to dd‐cfDNA fraction (dd‐cfDNA[%]) at prespecified visits in 189 patients over 1 year post KTx. In patients (N = 15, n = 22 samples) with biopsy‐proven rejection (BPR), median dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) was 3.3‐fold and median dd‐cfDNA(%) 2.0‐fold higher (82 cp/mL; 0.57%, respectively) than medians in Stable Phase patients (N = 83, n = 408) without rejection (25 cp/mL; 0.29%). Results for acute tubular necrosis (ATN) were not significantly different from those with biopsy‐proven rejection (BPR). dd‐cfDNA identified unnecessary biopsies triggered by a rise in plasma creatinine. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed superior performance (P = .02) of measuring dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) (AUC = 0.83) compared to dd‐cfDNA(%) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73). Diagnostic odds ratios were 7.31 for dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL), and 6.02 for dd‐cfDNA(%) at thresholds of 52 cp/mL and 0.43%, respectively. Plasma creatinine showed a low correlation (r = 0.37) with dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL). In a patient subset (N = 24) there was a significantly higher rate of patients with elevated dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) with lower tacrolimus levels (<8 μg/L) compared to the group with higher tacrolimus concentrations (P = .0036) suggesting that dd‐cfDNA may detect inadequate immunosuppression resulting in subclinical graft damage. Absolute dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) allowed for better discrimination than dd‐cfDNA(%) of KTx patients with BPR and is useful to avoid unnecessary biopsies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6899936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68999362019-12-20 Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study Oellerich, Michael Shipkova, Maria Asendorf, Thomas Walson, Philip D. Schauerte, Verena Mettenmeyer, Nina Kabakchiev, Mariana Hasche, Georg Gröne, Hermann‐Josef Friede, Tim Wieland, Eberhard Schwenger, Vedat Schütz, Ekkehard Beck, Julia Am J Transplant ORIGINAL ARTICLES Donor‐derived cell‐free DNA (dd‐cfDNA) is a noninvasive biomarker for comprehensive monitoring of allograft injury and rejection in kidney transplantation (KTx). dd‐cfDNA quantification of copies/mL plasma (dd‐cfDNA[cp/mL]) was compared to dd‐cfDNA fraction (dd‐cfDNA[%]) at prespecified visits in 189 patients over 1 year post KTx. In patients (N = 15, n = 22 samples) with biopsy‐proven rejection (BPR), median dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) was 3.3‐fold and median dd‐cfDNA(%) 2.0‐fold higher (82 cp/mL; 0.57%, respectively) than medians in Stable Phase patients (N = 83, n = 408) without rejection (25 cp/mL; 0.29%). Results for acute tubular necrosis (ATN) were not significantly different from those with biopsy‐proven rejection (BPR). dd‐cfDNA identified unnecessary biopsies triggered by a rise in plasma creatinine. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed superior performance (P = .02) of measuring dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) (AUC = 0.83) compared to dd‐cfDNA(%) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73). Diagnostic odds ratios were 7.31 for dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL), and 6.02 for dd‐cfDNA(%) at thresholds of 52 cp/mL and 0.43%, respectively. Plasma creatinine showed a low correlation (r = 0.37) with dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL). In a patient subset (N = 24) there was a significantly higher rate of patients with elevated dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) with lower tacrolimus levels (<8 μg/L) compared to the group with higher tacrolimus concentrations (P = .0036) suggesting that dd‐cfDNA may detect inadequate immunosuppression resulting in subclinical graft damage. Absolute dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) allowed for better discrimination than dd‐cfDNA(%) of KTx patients with BPR and is useful to avoid unnecessary biopsies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-28 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6899936/ /pubmed/31062511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15416 Text en © 2019 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Oellerich, Michael
Shipkova, Maria
Asendorf, Thomas
Walson, Philip D.
Schauerte, Verena
Mettenmeyer, Nina
Kabakchiev, Mariana
Hasche, Georg
Gröne, Hermann‐Josef
Friede, Tim
Wieland, Eberhard
Schwenger, Vedat
Schütz, Ekkehard
Beck, Julia
Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study
title Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study
title_full Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study
title_short Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study
title_sort absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free dna as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: results from a prospective observational study
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31062511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15416
work_keys_str_mv AT oellerichmichael absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT shipkovamaria absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT asendorfthomas absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT walsonphilipd absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT schauerteverena absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT mettenmeyernina absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kabakchievmariana absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT haschegeorg absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT gronehermannjosef absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT friedetim absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT wielandeberhard absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT schwengervedat absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT schutzekkehard absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT beckjulia absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy