Cargando…
Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study
Donor‐derived cell‐free DNA (dd‐cfDNA) is a noninvasive biomarker for comprehensive monitoring of allograft injury and rejection in kidney transplantation (KTx). dd‐cfDNA quantification of copies/mL plasma (dd‐cfDNA[cp/mL]) was compared to dd‐cfDNA fraction (dd‐cfDNA[%]) at prespecified visits in 18...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31062511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15416 |
_version_ | 1783477243202240512 |
---|---|
author | Oellerich, Michael Shipkova, Maria Asendorf, Thomas Walson, Philip D. Schauerte, Verena Mettenmeyer, Nina Kabakchiev, Mariana Hasche, Georg Gröne, Hermann‐Josef Friede, Tim Wieland, Eberhard Schwenger, Vedat Schütz, Ekkehard Beck, Julia |
author_facet | Oellerich, Michael Shipkova, Maria Asendorf, Thomas Walson, Philip D. Schauerte, Verena Mettenmeyer, Nina Kabakchiev, Mariana Hasche, Georg Gröne, Hermann‐Josef Friede, Tim Wieland, Eberhard Schwenger, Vedat Schütz, Ekkehard Beck, Julia |
author_sort | Oellerich, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Donor‐derived cell‐free DNA (dd‐cfDNA) is a noninvasive biomarker for comprehensive monitoring of allograft injury and rejection in kidney transplantation (KTx). dd‐cfDNA quantification of copies/mL plasma (dd‐cfDNA[cp/mL]) was compared to dd‐cfDNA fraction (dd‐cfDNA[%]) at prespecified visits in 189 patients over 1 year post KTx. In patients (N = 15, n = 22 samples) with biopsy‐proven rejection (BPR), median dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) was 3.3‐fold and median dd‐cfDNA(%) 2.0‐fold higher (82 cp/mL; 0.57%, respectively) than medians in Stable Phase patients (N = 83, n = 408) without rejection (25 cp/mL; 0.29%). Results for acute tubular necrosis (ATN) were not significantly different from those with biopsy‐proven rejection (BPR). dd‐cfDNA identified unnecessary biopsies triggered by a rise in plasma creatinine. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed superior performance (P = .02) of measuring dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) (AUC = 0.83) compared to dd‐cfDNA(%) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73). Diagnostic odds ratios were 7.31 for dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL), and 6.02 for dd‐cfDNA(%) at thresholds of 52 cp/mL and 0.43%, respectively. Plasma creatinine showed a low correlation (r = 0.37) with dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL). In a patient subset (N = 24) there was a significantly higher rate of patients with elevated dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) with lower tacrolimus levels (<8 μg/L) compared to the group with higher tacrolimus concentrations (P = .0036) suggesting that dd‐cfDNA may detect inadequate immunosuppression resulting in subclinical graft damage. Absolute dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) allowed for better discrimination than dd‐cfDNA(%) of KTx patients with BPR and is useful to avoid unnecessary biopsies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6899936 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68999362019-12-20 Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study Oellerich, Michael Shipkova, Maria Asendorf, Thomas Walson, Philip D. Schauerte, Verena Mettenmeyer, Nina Kabakchiev, Mariana Hasche, Georg Gröne, Hermann‐Josef Friede, Tim Wieland, Eberhard Schwenger, Vedat Schütz, Ekkehard Beck, Julia Am J Transplant ORIGINAL ARTICLES Donor‐derived cell‐free DNA (dd‐cfDNA) is a noninvasive biomarker for comprehensive monitoring of allograft injury and rejection in kidney transplantation (KTx). dd‐cfDNA quantification of copies/mL plasma (dd‐cfDNA[cp/mL]) was compared to dd‐cfDNA fraction (dd‐cfDNA[%]) at prespecified visits in 189 patients over 1 year post KTx. In patients (N = 15, n = 22 samples) with biopsy‐proven rejection (BPR), median dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) was 3.3‐fold and median dd‐cfDNA(%) 2.0‐fold higher (82 cp/mL; 0.57%, respectively) than medians in Stable Phase patients (N = 83, n = 408) without rejection (25 cp/mL; 0.29%). Results for acute tubular necrosis (ATN) were not significantly different from those with biopsy‐proven rejection (BPR). dd‐cfDNA identified unnecessary biopsies triggered by a rise in plasma creatinine. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed superior performance (P = .02) of measuring dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) (AUC = 0.83) compared to dd‐cfDNA(%) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.73). Diagnostic odds ratios were 7.31 for dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL), and 6.02 for dd‐cfDNA(%) at thresholds of 52 cp/mL and 0.43%, respectively. Plasma creatinine showed a low correlation (r = 0.37) with dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL). In a patient subset (N = 24) there was a significantly higher rate of patients with elevated dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) with lower tacrolimus levels (<8 μg/L) compared to the group with higher tacrolimus concentrations (P = .0036) suggesting that dd‐cfDNA may detect inadequate immunosuppression resulting in subclinical graft damage. Absolute dd‐cfDNA(cp/mL) allowed for better discrimination than dd‐cfDNA(%) of KTx patients with BPR and is useful to avoid unnecessary biopsies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-05-28 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6899936/ /pubmed/31062511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15416 Text en © 2019 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL ARTICLES Oellerich, Michael Shipkova, Maria Asendorf, Thomas Walson, Philip D. Schauerte, Verena Mettenmeyer, Nina Kabakchiev, Mariana Hasche, Georg Gröne, Hermann‐Josef Friede, Tim Wieland, Eberhard Schwenger, Vedat Schütz, Ekkehard Beck, Julia Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study |
title | Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study |
title_full | Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study |
title_fullStr | Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study |
title_short | Absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free DNA as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: Results from a prospective observational study |
title_sort | absolute quantification of donor‐derived cell‐free dna as a marker of rejection and graft injury in kidney transplantation: results from a prospective observational study |
topic | ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31062511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15416 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oellerichmichael absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT shipkovamaria absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT asendorfthomas absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT walsonphilipd absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT schauerteverena absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT mettenmeyernina absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT kabakchievmariana absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT haschegeorg absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT gronehermannjosef absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT friedetim absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT wielandeberhard absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT schwengervedat absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT schutzekkehard absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT beckjulia absolutequantificationofdonorderivedcellfreednaasamarkerofrejectionandgraftinjuryinkidneytransplantationresultsfromaprospectiveobservationalstudy |