Cargando…

Optimal acquisition scheme for flow‐compensated intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging in the abdomen: An accurate and precise clinically feasible protocol

PURPOSE: Flow‐compensated (FC) diffusion‐weighted MRI (DWI) for intravoxel‐incoherent motion (IVIM) modeling allows for a more detailed description of tissue microvasculature than conventional IVIM. The long acquisition time of current FC‐IVIM protocols, however, has prohibited clinical application....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J., Rauh, Susanne S., Harrington, Kevin, Oelfke, Uwe, Laun, Frederik B., Wetscherek, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31566262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27990
_version_ 1783477244604186624
author Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J.
Rauh, Susanne S.
Harrington, Kevin
Oelfke, Uwe
Laun, Frederik B.
Wetscherek, Andreas
author_facet Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J.
Rauh, Susanne S.
Harrington, Kevin
Oelfke, Uwe
Laun, Frederik B.
Wetscherek, Andreas
author_sort Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Flow‐compensated (FC) diffusion‐weighted MRI (DWI) for intravoxel‐incoherent motion (IVIM) modeling allows for a more detailed description of tissue microvasculature than conventional IVIM. The long acquisition time of current FC‐IVIM protocols, however, has prohibited clinical application. Therefore, we developed an optimized abdominal FC‐IVIM acquisition with a clinically feasible scan time. METHODS: Precision and accuracy of the FC‐IVIM parameters were assessed by fitting the FC‐IVIM model to signal decay curves, simulated for different acquisition schemes. Diffusion‐weighted acquisitions were added subsequently to the protocol, where we chose the combination of b‐value, diffusion time and gradient profile (FC or bipolar) that resulted in the largest improvement to its accuracy and precision. The resulting two optimized FC‐IVIM protocols with 25 and 50 acquisitions (FC‐IVIM(opt25) and FC‐IVIM(opt50)), together with a complementary acquisition consisting of 50 diffusion‐weighting (FC‐IVIM(comp)), were acquired in repeated abdominal free‐breathing FC‐IVIM imaging of seven healthy volunteers. Intersession and intrasession within‐subject coefficient of variation of the FC‐IVIM parameters were compared for the liver, spleen, and kidneys. RESULTS: Simulations showed that the performance of FC‐IVIM improved in tissue with larger perfusion fraction and signal‐to‐noise ratio. The scan time of the FC‐IVIM(opt25) and FC‐IVIM(opt50) protocols were 8 and 16 min. The best in vivo performance was seen in FC‐IVIM(opt50). The intersession within‐subject coefficients of variation of FC‐IVIM(opt50) were 11.6%, 16.3%, 65.5%, and 36.0% for FC‐IVIM model parameters diffusivity, perfusion fraction, characteristic time and blood flow velocity, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We have optimized the FC‐IVIM protocol, allowing for clinically feasible scan times (8‐16 min).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6899942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68999422019-12-20 Optimal acquisition scheme for flow‐compensated intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging in the abdomen: An accurate and precise clinically feasible protocol Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J. Rauh, Susanne S. Harrington, Kevin Oelfke, Uwe Laun, Frederik B. Wetscherek, Andreas Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Imaging Methodology PURPOSE: Flow‐compensated (FC) diffusion‐weighted MRI (DWI) for intravoxel‐incoherent motion (IVIM) modeling allows for a more detailed description of tissue microvasculature than conventional IVIM. The long acquisition time of current FC‐IVIM protocols, however, has prohibited clinical application. Therefore, we developed an optimized abdominal FC‐IVIM acquisition with a clinically feasible scan time. METHODS: Precision and accuracy of the FC‐IVIM parameters were assessed by fitting the FC‐IVIM model to signal decay curves, simulated for different acquisition schemes. Diffusion‐weighted acquisitions were added subsequently to the protocol, where we chose the combination of b‐value, diffusion time and gradient profile (FC or bipolar) that resulted in the largest improvement to its accuracy and precision. The resulting two optimized FC‐IVIM protocols with 25 and 50 acquisitions (FC‐IVIM(opt25) and FC‐IVIM(opt50)), together with a complementary acquisition consisting of 50 diffusion‐weighting (FC‐IVIM(comp)), were acquired in repeated abdominal free‐breathing FC‐IVIM imaging of seven healthy volunteers. Intersession and intrasession within‐subject coefficient of variation of the FC‐IVIM parameters were compared for the liver, spleen, and kidneys. RESULTS: Simulations showed that the performance of FC‐IVIM improved in tissue with larger perfusion fraction and signal‐to‐noise ratio. The scan time of the FC‐IVIM(opt25) and FC‐IVIM(opt50) protocols were 8 and 16 min. The best in vivo performance was seen in FC‐IVIM(opt50). The intersession within‐subject coefficients of variation of FC‐IVIM(opt50) were 11.6%, 16.3%, 65.5%, and 36.0% for FC‐IVIM model parameters diffusivity, perfusion fraction, characteristic time and blood flow velocity, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We have optimized the FC‐IVIM protocol, allowing for clinically feasible scan times (8‐16 min). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-30 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6899942/ /pubmed/31566262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27990 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers—Imaging Methodology
Gurney‐Champion, Oliver J.
Rauh, Susanne S.
Harrington, Kevin
Oelfke, Uwe
Laun, Frederik B.
Wetscherek, Andreas
Optimal acquisition scheme for flow‐compensated intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging in the abdomen: An accurate and precise clinically feasible protocol
title Optimal acquisition scheme for flow‐compensated intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging in the abdomen: An accurate and precise clinically feasible protocol
title_full Optimal acquisition scheme for flow‐compensated intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging in the abdomen: An accurate and precise clinically feasible protocol
title_fullStr Optimal acquisition scheme for flow‐compensated intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging in the abdomen: An accurate and precise clinically feasible protocol
title_full_unstemmed Optimal acquisition scheme for flow‐compensated intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging in the abdomen: An accurate and precise clinically feasible protocol
title_short Optimal acquisition scheme for flow‐compensated intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging in the abdomen: An accurate and precise clinically feasible protocol
title_sort optimal acquisition scheme for flow‐compensated intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging in the abdomen: an accurate and precise clinically feasible protocol
topic Full Papers—Imaging Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6899942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31566262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27990
work_keys_str_mv AT gurneychampionoliverj optimalacquisitionschemeforflowcompensatedintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingintheabdomenanaccurateandpreciseclinicallyfeasibleprotocol
AT rauhsusannes optimalacquisitionschemeforflowcompensatedintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingintheabdomenanaccurateandpreciseclinicallyfeasibleprotocol
AT harringtonkevin optimalacquisitionschemeforflowcompensatedintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingintheabdomenanaccurateandpreciseclinicallyfeasibleprotocol
AT oelfkeuwe optimalacquisitionschemeforflowcompensatedintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingintheabdomenanaccurateandpreciseclinicallyfeasibleprotocol
AT launfrederikb optimalacquisitionschemeforflowcompensatedintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingintheabdomenanaccurateandpreciseclinicallyfeasibleprotocol
AT wetscherekandreas optimalacquisitionschemeforflowcompensatedintravoxelincoherentmotiondiffusionweightedimagingintheabdomenanaccurateandpreciseclinicallyfeasibleprotocol