Cargando…

Feasibility and tolerability of measuring translaryngeal pressure during exercise

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine if simultaneous tracheal and supraglottic pressure measurement performed during a continuous laryngoscopy exercise (CLE) test is possible, tolerable, and feasible, and if so, whether measurements can be used to determined airflow resistance over the larynx, thus p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fretheim‐Kelly, Zoe, Halvorsen, Thomas, Heimdal, John‐Helge, Strand, Eric, Vollsæter, Maria, Clemm, Hege, Roksund, Ola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30698834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27846
_version_ 1783477270584754176
author Fretheim‐Kelly, Zoe
Halvorsen, Thomas
Heimdal, John‐Helge
Strand, Eric
Vollsæter, Maria
Clemm, Hege
Roksund, Ola
author_facet Fretheim‐Kelly, Zoe
Halvorsen, Thomas
Heimdal, John‐Helge
Strand, Eric
Vollsæter, Maria
Clemm, Hege
Roksund, Ola
author_sort Fretheim‐Kelly, Zoe
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine if simultaneous tracheal and supraglottic pressure measurement performed during a continuous laryngoscopy exercise (CLE) test is possible, tolerable, and feasible, and if so, whether measurements can be used to determined airflow resistance over the larynx, thus providing an objective outcome measure for the CLE test, the gold standard for diagnosing exercise‐induced laryngeal obstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Explorative descriptive clinical study. METHODS: A CLE test was performed with the addition of two pressure sensors (Mikro‐Cath 825‐0101; Millar, Houston, TX) placed at the epiglottic tip and at the fifth tracheal ring. To place sensors, laryngeal anesthesia and a channel scope were required. Tolerability and feasibility was determined by a Likert score and subjective indication from subjects and operators. Adjustments to the technique were made to increase tolerability. The pressure data were continuously collected and analyzed for artifacts, drifts, frequency response, and used with flow data to calculate translaryngeal resistance. RESULTS: All subjects (n = 7) completed all procedures. Two main areas of concern were identified regarding tolerability: application of topical anesthesia to the larynx and nasal discomfort due to the added diameter of the laryngoscope. Protocol adjustments improved both. Pressure data were obtained from all procedures in all subjects, were consistent, and followed physiological trends. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous measurement of the translaryngeal pressure gradient during a CLE test is possible, feasible, and tolerable. A CLE test with direct measurement of the translaryngeal pressure gradient might become a valuable tool in the objective assessment of respiratory function, and normal values should be established in health and disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 129:2748–2753, 2019
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6900056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69000562019-12-20 Feasibility and tolerability of measuring translaryngeal pressure during exercise Fretheim‐Kelly, Zoe Halvorsen, Thomas Heimdal, John‐Helge Strand, Eric Vollsæter, Maria Clemm, Hege Roksund, Ola Laryngoscope Laryngology OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine if simultaneous tracheal and supraglottic pressure measurement performed during a continuous laryngoscopy exercise (CLE) test is possible, tolerable, and feasible, and if so, whether measurements can be used to determined airflow resistance over the larynx, thus providing an objective outcome measure for the CLE test, the gold standard for diagnosing exercise‐induced laryngeal obstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Explorative descriptive clinical study. METHODS: A CLE test was performed with the addition of two pressure sensors (Mikro‐Cath 825‐0101; Millar, Houston, TX) placed at the epiglottic tip and at the fifth tracheal ring. To place sensors, laryngeal anesthesia and a channel scope were required. Tolerability and feasibility was determined by a Likert score and subjective indication from subjects and operators. Adjustments to the technique were made to increase tolerability. The pressure data were continuously collected and analyzed for artifacts, drifts, frequency response, and used with flow data to calculate translaryngeal resistance. RESULTS: All subjects (n = 7) completed all procedures. Two main areas of concern were identified regarding tolerability: application of topical anesthesia to the larynx and nasal discomfort due to the added diameter of the laryngoscope. Protocol adjustments improved both. Pressure data were obtained from all procedures in all subjects, were consistent, and followed physiological trends. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous measurement of the translaryngeal pressure gradient during a CLE test is possible, feasible, and tolerable. A CLE test with direct measurement of the translaryngeal pressure gradient might become a valuable tool in the objective assessment of respiratory function, and normal values should be established in health and disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 129:2748–2753, 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-01-30 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6900056/ /pubmed/30698834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27846 Text en © 2019 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Laryngology
Fretheim‐Kelly, Zoe
Halvorsen, Thomas
Heimdal, John‐Helge
Strand, Eric
Vollsæter, Maria
Clemm, Hege
Roksund, Ola
Feasibility and tolerability of measuring translaryngeal pressure during exercise
title Feasibility and tolerability of measuring translaryngeal pressure during exercise
title_full Feasibility and tolerability of measuring translaryngeal pressure during exercise
title_fullStr Feasibility and tolerability of measuring translaryngeal pressure during exercise
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and tolerability of measuring translaryngeal pressure during exercise
title_short Feasibility and tolerability of measuring translaryngeal pressure during exercise
title_sort feasibility and tolerability of measuring translaryngeal pressure during exercise
topic Laryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30698834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27846
work_keys_str_mv AT fretheimkellyzoe feasibilityandtolerabilityofmeasuringtranslaryngealpressureduringexercise
AT halvorsenthomas feasibilityandtolerabilityofmeasuringtranslaryngealpressureduringexercise
AT heimdaljohnhelge feasibilityandtolerabilityofmeasuringtranslaryngealpressureduringexercise
AT stranderic feasibilityandtolerabilityofmeasuringtranslaryngealpressureduringexercise
AT vollsætermaria feasibilityandtolerabilityofmeasuringtranslaryngealpressureduringexercise
AT clemmhege feasibilityandtolerabilityofmeasuringtranslaryngealpressureduringexercise
AT roksundola feasibilityandtolerabilityofmeasuringtranslaryngealpressureduringexercise