Cargando…

Revisiting the classification of adhesion GPCRs

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) are encoded by over 800 genes in the human genome. Motivated by different scientific rationales, the two classification systems that are mainly in use, the ABC and GRAFS systems, organize GPCRs according to their pharmacological features and phylogenetic relations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scholz, Nicole, Langenhan, Tobias, Schöneberg, Torsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31365134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14192
_version_ 1783477278300176384
author Scholz, Nicole
Langenhan, Tobias
Schöneberg, Torsten
author_facet Scholz, Nicole
Langenhan, Tobias
Schöneberg, Torsten
author_sort Scholz, Nicole
collection PubMed
description G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) are encoded by over 800 genes in the human genome. Motivated by different scientific rationales, the two classification systems that are mainly in use, the ABC and GRAFS systems, organize GPCRs according to their pharmacological features and phylogenetic relations, respectively. Within those systems, adhesion GPCRs (aGPCRs) constitute a group of over 30 mammalian homologs, most of which are still orphans with undefined activating signals and signal transduction properties. Previous efforts have further subdivided mammalian aGPCRs into nine subfamilies to indicate phylogenetic relationships. However, this subclassification scheme has shortcomings and inconsistencies that require attention. Here, we have reassessed the phylogenetic relationships of aGPCRs from vertebrate and invertebrate species. Our findings confirm that secretin receptor–like GPCRs most probably emerged from ancestral aGPCRs. We show that reassignment of several aGPCRs to families essentially requires input from functional data. Our analyses establish the need for introducing novel aGPCR subfamilies due to aGPCR sequences from invertebrate species that are not readily assignable to any existing subfamily. We conclude that the current classification systems ought to be updated to consider an unambiguous taxonomy of a hierarchically organized classification and pharmacological properties, and to accommodate phylogenetic affiliations between aGPCR genes within mammals and across the animal kingdom.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6900090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69000902019-12-20 Revisiting the classification of adhesion GPCRs Scholz, Nicole Langenhan, Tobias Schöneberg, Torsten Ann N Y Acad Sci Original Articles G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) are encoded by over 800 genes in the human genome. Motivated by different scientific rationales, the two classification systems that are mainly in use, the ABC and GRAFS systems, organize GPCRs according to their pharmacological features and phylogenetic relations, respectively. Within those systems, adhesion GPCRs (aGPCRs) constitute a group of over 30 mammalian homologs, most of which are still orphans with undefined activating signals and signal transduction properties. Previous efforts have further subdivided mammalian aGPCRs into nine subfamilies to indicate phylogenetic relationships. However, this subclassification scheme has shortcomings and inconsistencies that require attention. Here, we have reassessed the phylogenetic relationships of aGPCRs from vertebrate and invertebrate species. Our findings confirm that secretin receptor–like GPCRs most probably emerged from ancestral aGPCRs. We show that reassignment of several aGPCRs to families essentially requires input from functional data. Our analyses establish the need for introducing novel aGPCR subfamilies due to aGPCR sequences from invertebrate species that are not readily assignable to any existing subfamily. We conclude that the current classification systems ought to be updated to consider an unambiguous taxonomy of a hierarchically organized classification and pharmacological properties, and to accommodate phylogenetic affiliations between aGPCR genes within mammals and across the animal kingdom. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-31 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6900090/ /pubmed/31365134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14192 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of New York Academy of Sciences. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Scholz, Nicole
Langenhan, Tobias
Schöneberg, Torsten
Revisiting the classification of adhesion GPCRs
title Revisiting the classification of adhesion GPCRs
title_full Revisiting the classification of adhesion GPCRs
title_fullStr Revisiting the classification of adhesion GPCRs
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the classification of adhesion GPCRs
title_short Revisiting the classification of adhesion GPCRs
title_sort revisiting the classification of adhesion gpcrs
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31365134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14192
work_keys_str_mv AT scholznicole revisitingtheclassificationofadhesiongpcrs
AT langenhantobias revisitingtheclassificationofadhesiongpcrs
AT schonebergtorsten revisitingtheclassificationofadhesiongpcrs