Cargando…

Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in and provision of cadaveric simulation courses for surgical trainees. This is being driven by the need to modernize and improve the efficiency of surgical training within the current challenging training climate. The objective of this systematic review is to d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James, H. K., Chapman, A. W., Pattison, G. T. R., Griffin, D. R., Fisher, J. D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31573088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11325
_version_ 1783477286840827904
author James, H. K.
Chapman, A. W.
Pattison, G. T. R.
Griffin, D. R.
Fisher, J. D.
author_facet James, H. K.
Chapman, A. W.
Pattison, G. T. R.
Griffin, D. R.
Fisher, J. D.
author_sort James, H. K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in and provision of cadaveric simulation courses for surgical trainees. This is being driven by the need to modernize and improve the efficiency of surgical training within the current challenging training climate. The objective of this systematic review is to describe and evaluate the evidence for cadaveric simulation in postgraduate surgical training. METHODS: A PRISMA‐compliant systematic literature review of studies that prospectively evaluated a cadaveric simulation training intervention for surgical trainees was undertaken. All relevant databases and trial registries were searched to January 2019. Methodological rigour was assessed using the widely validated Medical Education Research Quality Index (MERSQI) tool. RESULTS: A total of 51 studies were included, involving 2002 surgical trainees across 69 cadaveric training interventions. Of these, 22 assessed the impact of the cadaveric training intervention using only subjective measures, five measured impact by change in learner knowledge, and 23 used objective tools to assess change in learner behaviour after training. Only one study assessed patient outcome and demonstrated transfer of skill from the simulated environment to the workplace. Of the included studies, 67 per cent had weak methodology (MERSQI score less than 10·7). CONCLUSION: There is an abundance of relatively low‐quality evidence showing that cadaveric simulation induces short‐term skill acquisition as measured by objective means. There is currently a lack of evidence of skill retention, and of transfer of skills following training into the live operating theatre.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6900127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69001272019-12-20 Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training James, H. K. Chapman, A. W. Pattison, G. T. R. Griffin, D. R. Fisher, J. D. Br J Surg Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in and provision of cadaveric simulation courses for surgical trainees. This is being driven by the need to modernize and improve the efficiency of surgical training within the current challenging training climate. The objective of this systematic review is to describe and evaluate the evidence for cadaveric simulation in postgraduate surgical training. METHODS: A PRISMA‐compliant systematic literature review of studies that prospectively evaluated a cadaveric simulation training intervention for surgical trainees was undertaken. All relevant databases and trial registries were searched to January 2019. Methodological rigour was assessed using the widely validated Medical Education Research Quality Index (MERSQI) tool. RESULTS: A total of 51 studies were included, involving 2002 surgical trainees across 69 cadaveric training interventions. Of these, 22 assessed the impact of the cadaveric training intervention using only subjective measures, five measured impact by change in learner knowledge, and 23 used objective tools to assess change in learner behaviour after training. Only one study assessed patient outcome and demonstrated transfer of skill from the simulated environment to the workplace. Of the included studies, 67 per cent had weak methodology (MERSQI score less than 10·7). CONCLUSION: There is an abundance of relatively low‐quality evidence showing that cadaveric simulation induces short‐term skill acquisition as measured by objective means. There is currently a lack of evidence of skill retention, and of transfer of skills following training into the live operating theatre. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2019-10-01 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6900127/ /pubmed/31573088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11325 Text en © 2019 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
James, H. K.
Chapman, A. W.
Pattison, G. T. R.
Griffin, D. R.
Fisher, J. D.
Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training
title Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training
title_full Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training
title_fullStr Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training
title_short Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training
title_sort systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31573088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11325
work_keys_str_mv AT jameshk systematicreviewofthecurrentstatusofcadavericsimulationforsurgicaltraining
AT chapmanaw systematicreviewofthecurrentstatusofcadavericsimulationforsurgicaltraining
AT pattisongtr systematicreviewofthecurrentstatusofcadavericsimulationforsurgicaltraining
AT griffindr systematicreviewofthecurrentstatusofcadavericsimulationforsurgicaltraining
AT fisherjd systematicreviewofthecurrentstatusofcadavericsimulationforsurgicaltraining