Cargando…
Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training
BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in and provision of cadaveric simulation courses for surgical trainees. This is being driven by the need to modernize and improve the efficiency of surgical training within the current challenging training climate. The objective of this systematic review is to d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31573088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11325 |
_version_ | 1783477286840827904 |
---|---|
author | James, H. K. Chapman, A. W. Pattison, G. T. R. Griffin, D. R. Fisher, J. D. |
author_facet | James, H. K. Chapman, A. W. Pattison, G. T. R. Griffin, D. R. Fisher, J. D. |
author_sort | James, H. K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in and provision of cadaveric simulation courses for surgical trainees. This is being driven by the need to modernize and improve the efficiency of surgical training within the current challenging training climate. The objective of this systematic review is to describe and evaluate the evidence for cadaveric simulation in postgraduate surgical training. METHODS: A PRISMA‐compliant systematic literature review of studies that prospectively evaluated a cadaveric simulation training intervention for surgical trainees was undertaken. All relevant databases and trial registries were searched to January 2019. Methodological rigour was assessed using the widely validated Medical Education Research Quality Index (MERSQI) tool. RESULTS: A total of 51 studies were included, involving 2002 surgical trainees across 69 cadaveric training interventions. Of these, 22 assessed the impact of the cadaveric training intervention using only subjective measures, five measured impact by change in learner knowledge, and 23 used objective tools to assess change in learner behaviour after training. Only one study assessed patient outcome and demonstrated transfer of skill from the simulated environment to the workplace. Of the included studies, 67 per cent had weak methodology (MERSQI score less than 10·7). CONCLUSION: There is an abundance of relatively low‐quality evidence showing that cadaveric simulation induces short‐term skill acquisition as measured by objective means. There is currently a lack of evidence of skill retention, and of transfer of skills following training into the live operating theatre. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6900127 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69001272019-12-20 Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training James, H. K. Chapman, A. W. Pattison, G. T. R. Griffin, D. R. Fisher, J. D. Br J Surg Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in and provision of cadaveric simulation courses for surgical trainees. This is being driven by the need to modernize and improve the efficiency of surgical training within the current challenging training climate. The objective of this systematic review is to describe and evaluate the evidence for cadaveric simulation in postgraduate surgical training. METHODS: A PRISMA‐compliant systematic literature review of studies that prospectively evaluated a cadaveric simulation training intervention for surgical trainees was undertaken. All relevant databases and trial registries were searched to January 2019. Methodological rigour was assessed using the widely validated Medical Education Research Quality Index (MERSQI) tool. RESULTS: A total of 51 studies were included, involving 2002 surgical trainees across 69 cadaveric training interventions. Of these, 22 assessed the impact of the cadaveric training intervention using only subjective measures, five measured impact by change in learner knowledge, and 23 used objective tools to assess change in learner behaviour after training. Only one study assessed patient outcome and demonstrated transfer of skill from the simulated environment to the workplace. Of the included studies, 67 per cent had weak methodology (MERSQI score less than 10·7). CONCLUSION: There is an abundance of relatively low‐quality evidence showing that cadaveric simulation induces short‐term skill acquisition as measured by objective means. There is currently a lack of evidence of skill retention, and of transfer of skills following training into the live operating theatre. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2019-10-01 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6900127/ /pubmed/31573088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11325 Text en © 2019 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews James, H. K. Chapman, A. W. Pattison, G. T. R. Griffin, D. R. Fisher, J. D. Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training |
title | Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training |
title_full | Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training |
title_fullStr | Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training |
title_short | Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training |
title_sort | systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900127/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31573088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jameshk systematicreviewofthecurrentstatusofcadavericsimulationforsurgicaltraining AT chapmanaw systematicreviewofthecurrentstatusofcadavericsimulationforsurgicaltraining AT pattisongtr systematicreviewofthecurrentstatusofcadavericsimulationforsurgicaltraining AT griffindr systematicreviewofthecurrentstatusofcadavericsimulationforsurgicaltraining AT fisherjd systematicreviewofthecurrentstatusofcadavericsimulationforsurgicaltraining |