Cargando…
Superior HbA1c control with the fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with a maximum dose of 50 units of insulin degludec in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, double‐blind, randomized trial
AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with 50 U insulin degludec (degludec) or less in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 26‐week, double‐blind, multicentre, treat‐to‐target trial, Japanese indivi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31423685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13859 |
_version_ | 1783477293839024128 |
---|---|
author | Watada, Hirotaka Kaneko, Shizuka Komatsu, Mitsuhisa Agner, Bue Ross Nishida, Tomoyuki Ranthe, Mattis Nakamura, Jiro |
author_facet | Watada, Hirotaka Kaneko, Shizuka Komatsu, Mitsuhisa Agner, Bue Ross Nishida, Tomoyuki Ranthe, Mattis Nakamura, Jiro |
author_sort | Watada, Hirotaka |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with 50 U insulin degludec (degludec) or less in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 26‐week, double‐blind, multicentre, treat‐to‐target trial, Japanese individuals with T2D that was uncontrolled with basal or pre‐mix insulin (20–50 units) were randomized (1:1) to receive IDegLira or degludec, both with metformin. The maximum dose was 50 dose steps (IDegLira) or 50 units (degludec). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c with IDegLira vs degludec after 26 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: In total, 210 Japanese individuals were randomized to IDegLira or degludec and completion rates were 100% and 93%, respectively. IDegLira was superior to degludec with respect to change from baseline in HbA1c: estimated treatment difference (ETD) (95% confidence interval), −13.98 mmol/Mol (−16.41; −11.55); P < 0.0001. The change in mean HbA1c was from 70.6 by −21.3 mmol/Mol with IDegLira and from 70.1 by −7.1 mmol/Mol with degludec. Mean change in body weight was −0.7 kg with IDegLira and 0.7 kg with degludec: ETD (95% CI) −1.41 kg (−2.26; −0.56); P = 0.0012. Mean daily total insulin dose was significantly lower with IDegLira (37.6 U) as compared to that with degludec (41.2 U) at Week 26. Overall rates of severe or blood glucose‐confirmed hypoglycaemia and adverse events were comparable between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: IDegLira provided superior reductions in HbA1c compared with ≤50 U degludec, with weight loss and similar hypoglycaemia rates and no unexpected safety or tolerability issues. These results suggest that this treatment could be an attractive intensification option for Japanese subjects with T2D that was uncontrolled with basal or pre‐mixed insulin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6900157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69001572019-12-20 Superior HbA1c control with the fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with a maximum dose of 50 units of insulin degludec in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, double‐blind, randomized trial Watada, Hirotaka Kaneko, Shizuka Komatsu, Mitsuhisa Agner, Bue Ross Nishida, Tomoyuki Ranthe, Mattis Nakamura, Jiro Diabetes Obes Metab Original Articles AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with 50 U insulin degludec (degludec) or less in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 26‐week, double‐blind, multicentre, treat‐to‐target trial, Japanese individuals with T2D that was uncontrolled with basal or pre‐mix insulin (20–50 units) were randomized (1:1) to receive IDegLira or degludec, both with metformin. The maximum dose was 50 dose steps (IDegLira) or 50 units (degludec). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c with IDegLira vs degludec after 26 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: In total, 210 Japanese individuals were randomized to IDegLira or degludec and completion rates were 100% and 93%, respectively. IDegLira was superior to degludec with respect to change from baseline in HbA1c: estimated treatment difference (ETD) (95% confidence interval), −13.98 mmol/Mol (−16.41; −11.55); P < 0.0001. The change in mean HbA1c was from 70.6 by −21.3 mmol/Mol with IDegLira and from 70.1 by −7.1 mmol/Mol with degludec. Mean change in body weight was −0.7 kg with IDegLira and 0.7 kg with degludec: ETD (95% CI) −1.41 kg (−2.26; −0.56); P = 0.0012. Mean daily total insulin dose was significantly lower with IDegLira (37.6 U) as compared to that with degludec (41.2 U) at Week 26. Overall rates of severe or blood glucose‐confirmed hypoglycaemia and adverse events were comparable between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: IDegLira provided superior reductions in HbA1c compared with ≤50 U degludec, with weight loss and similar hypoglycaemia rates and no unexpected safety or tolerability issues. These results suggest that this treatment could be an attractive intensification option for Japanese subjects with T2D that was uncontrolled with basal or pre‐mixed insulin. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-09-17 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6900157/ /pubmed/31423685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13859 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Watada, Hirotaka Kaneko, Shizuka Komatsu, Mitsuhisa Agner, Bue Ross Nishida, Tomoyuki Ranthe, Mattis Nakamura, Jiro Superior HbA1c control with the fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with a maximum dose of 50 units of insulin degludec in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, double‐blind, randomized trial |
title | Superior HbA1c control with the fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with a maximum dose of 50 units of insulin degludec in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, double‐blind, randomized trial |
title_full | Superior HbA1c control with the fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with a maximum dose of 50 units of insulin degludec in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, double‐blind, randomized trial |
title_fullStr | Superior HbA1c control with the fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with a maximum dose of 50 units of insulin degludec in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, double‐blind, randomized trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Superior HbA1c control with the fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with a maximum dose of 50 units of insulin degludec in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, double‐blind, randomized trial |
title_short | Superior HbA1c control with the fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with a maximum dose of 50 units of insulin degludec in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, double‐blind, randomized trial |
title_sort | superior hba1c control with the fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (ideglira) compared with a maximum dose of 50 units of insulin degludec in japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes in a phase 3, double‐blind, randomized trial |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31423685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.13859 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watadahirotaka superiorhba1ccontrolwiththefixedratiocombinationofinsulindegludecandliraglutideidegliracomparedwithamaximumdoseof50unitsofinsulindegludecinjapaneseindividualswithtype2diabetesinaphase3doubleblindrandomizedtrial AT kanekoshizuka superiorhba1ccontrolwiththefixedratiocombinationofinsulindegludecandliraglutideidegliracomparedwithamaximumdoseof50unitsofinsulindegludecinjapaneseindividualswithtype2diabetesinaphase3doubleblindrandomizedtrial AT komatsumitsuhisa superiorhba1ccontrolwiththefixedratiocombinationofinsulindegludecandliraglutideidegliracomparedwithamaximumdoseof50unitsofinsulindegludecinjapaneseindividualswithtype2diabetesinaphase3doubleblindrandomizedtrial AT agnerbueross superiorhba1ccontrolwiththefixedratiocombinationofinsulindegludecandliraglutideidegliracomparedwithamaximumdoseof50unitsofinsulindegludecinjapaneseindividualswithtype2diabetesinaphase3doubleblindrandomizedtrial AT nishidatomoyuki superiorhba1ccontrolwiththefixedratiocombinationofinsulindegludecandliraglutideidegliracomparedwithamaximumdoseof50unitsofinsulindegludecinjapaneseindividualswithtype2diabetesinaphase3doubleblindrandomizedtrial AT ranthemattis superiorhba1ccontrolwiththefixedratiocombinationofinsulindegludecandliraglutideidegliracomparedwithamaximumdoseof50unitsofinsulindegludecinjapaneseindividualswithtype2diabetesinaphase3doubleblindrandomizedtrial AT nakamurajiro superiorhba1ccontrolwiththefixedratiocombinationofinsulindegludecandliraglutideidegliracomparedwithamaximumdoseof50unitsofinsulindegludecinjapaneseindividualswithtype2diabetesinaphase3doubleblindrandomizedtrial |