Cargando…

Evaluating sunscreen ultraviolet protection using a polychromatic diffuse reflectance device

BACKGROUND: Sun protection factor (SPF) and UVA protection factor (UVA‐PF) are determined using in vivo tests, with high exposures of subjects to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Hybrid diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (HDRS) enables estimation of both indices using only trace amounts UVB. However, the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cole, Curtis, Silverman, Jay, Bonitatibus, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31206814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12496
_version_ 1783477295577563136
author Cole, Curtis
Silverman, Jay
Bonitatibus, Michael
author_facet Cole, Curtis
Silverman, Jay
Bonitatibus, Michael
author_sort Cole, Curtis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sun protection factor (SPF) and UVA protection factor (UVA‐PF) are determined using in vivo tests, with high exposures of subjects to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Hybrid diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (HDRS) enables estimation of both indices using only trace amounts UVB. However, the equipment requires two expensive monochromators that must synchronously scan the spectrum. METHODS: An alternate approach was developed using a polychromatic source that illuminates the skin via a custom light guide array, and the diffuse reflected light is measured with a photomultiplier. The ratio of the diffuse reflectance with and without the sunscreen on the skin determines the polychromatic diffuse reflectance UVA‐PF (PDRS UVA‐PF(0)). This factor was used to adjust in vitro UV spectroscopy scans of the sunscreen (with and without UV exposure to assess photostability), to calculate SPF and UVA protection factors. Ten sunscreens were evaluated and compared to in vivo SPF and UVA‐PF values. RESULTS: The data show an excellent correlation with known in vivo determinations. CONCLUSION: This polychromatic HDRS approach uses simpler, faster, and less expensive equipment to determine both UVA‐PF and SPFs without high doses of UV radiation to the test subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6900164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69001642019-12-20 Evaluating sunscreen ultraviolet protection using a polychromatic diffuse reflectance device Cole, Curtis Silverman, Jay Bonitatibus, Michael Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed Original Articles BACKGROUND: Sun protection factor (SPF) and UVA protection factor (UVA‐PF) are determined using in vivo tests, with high exposures of subjects to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Hybrid diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (HDRS) enables estimation of both indices using only trace amounts UVB. However, the equipment requires two expensive monochromators that must synchronously scan the spectrum. METHODS: An alternate approach was developed using a polychromatic source that illuminates the skin via a custom light guide array, and the diffuse reflected light is measured with a photomultiplier. The ratio of the diffuse reflectance with and without the sunscreen on the skin determines the polychromatic diffuse reflectance UVA‐PF (PDRS UVA‐PF(0)). This factor was used to adjust in vitro UV spectroscopy scans of the sunscreen (with and without UV exposure to assess photostability), to calculate SPF and UVA protection factors. Ten sunscreens were evaluated and compared to in vivo SPF and UVA‐PF values. RESULTS: The data show an excellent correlation with known in vivo determinations. CONCLUSION: This polychromatic HDRS approach uses simpler, faster, and less expensive equipment to determine both UVA‐PF and SPFs without high doses of UV radiation to the test subjects. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-14 2019-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6900164/ /pubmed/31206814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12496 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cole, Curtis
Silverman, Jay
Bonitatibus, Michael
Evaluating sunscreen ultraviolet protection using a polychromatic diffuse reflectance device
title Evaluating sunscreen ultraviolet protection using a polychromatic diffuse reflectance device
title_full Evaluating sunscreen ultraviolet protection using a polychromatic diffuse reflectance device
title_fullStr Evaluating sunscreen ultraviolet protection using a polychromatic diffuse reflectance device
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating sunscreen ultraviolet protection using a polychromatic diffuse reflectance device
title_short Evaluating sunscreen ultraviolet protection using a polychromatic diffuse reflectance device
title_sort evaluating sunscreen ultraviolet protection using a polychromatic diffuse reflectance device
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31206814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12496
work_keys_str_mv AT colecurtis evaluatingsunscreenultravioletprotectionusingapolychromaticdiffusereflectancedevice
AT silvermanjay evaluatingsunscreenultravioletprotectionusingapolychromaticdiffusereflectancedevice
AT bonitatibusmichael evaluatingsunscreenultravioletprotectionusingapolychromaticdiffusereflectancedevice