Cargando…

Connecting patients, practitioners, and regulators in supporting positive experiences and processes of shared decision making: A progress report

This paper describes a novel approach to explore how regulators, working with patients and practitioners, may contribute to supporting person‐centred care and processes of shared decision making in implementing professional standards and reducing harms. Osteopathic patients report high levels of pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Browne, Fiona, Bettles, Steven, Clift, Stacey, Walker, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31597223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13279
_version_ 1783477301876359168
author Browne, Fiona
Bettles, Steven
Clift, Stacey
Walker, Tim
author_facet Browne, Fiona
Bettles, Steven
Clift, Stacey
Walker, Tim
author_sort Browne, Fiona
collection PubMed
description This paper describes a novel approach to explore how regulators, working with patients and practitioners, may contribute to supporting person‐centred care and processes of shared decision making in implementing professional standards and reducing harms. Osteopathic patients report high levels of patient care. However, areas of consultations less likely to be rated as high included “fully understanding your concerns,” “helping you to take control,” and “making a plan of action with you,” suggestive of a paternalistic approach to care and a barrier to the effective implementation of standards. This programme explored how to support patients and practitioners to make more explicit what is important to support consultations with better communication in accordance with standards. A series of workshops took place involving approximately 80 participants, which explored and identified practitioner and patient values; these were themed to develop a common framework and tested using case studies. Aspects of what enables or presents a barrier to a positive consultation were further explored with real patient narratives, and a range of resources were subsequently developed, which may support patients and practitioners to make explicit what is important to them in a consultation. A series of approaches and tools were then developed for piloting including patient curriculum vitae; patient goal planner; patient animation to support preparation for an appointment; infographic: a patient poster or leaflet; practitioner reflective tool; and an audio recording to increase awareness and understanding of values‐based practice. In conclusion, a range of approaches may help to support patients and practitioners to make explicit what is important to them in a consultation. The next phase of our programme will use a range of methods including cluster sampling, pre‐testing and post‐testing with the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure tool, and interviews and focus groups with users and practitioners to demonstrate impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6900193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69001932019-12-20 Connecting patients, practitioners, and regulators in supporting positive experiences and processes of shared decision making: A progress report Browne, Fiona Bettles, Steven Clift, Stacey Walker, Tim J Eval Clin Pract Special Issues This paper describes a novel approach to explore how regulators, working with patients and practitioners, may contribute to supporting person‐centred care and processes of shared decision making in implementing professional standards and reducing harms. Osteopathic patients report high levels of patient care. However, areas of consultations less likely to be rated as high included “fully understanding your concerns,” “helping you to take control,” and “making a plan of action with you,” suggestive of a paternalistic approach to care and a barrier to the effective implementation of standards. This programme explored how to support patients and practitioners to make more explicit what is important to support consultations with better communication in accordance with standards. A series of workshops took place involving approximately 80 participants, which explored and identified practitioner and patient values; these were themed to develop a common framework and tested using case studies. Aspects of what enables or presents a barrier to a positive consultation were further explored with real patient narratives, and a range of resources were subsequently developed, which may support patients and practitioners to make explicit what is important to them in a consultation. A series of approaches and tools were then developed for piloting including patient curriculum vitae; patient goal planner; patient animation to support preparation for an appointment; infographic: a patient poster or leaflet; practitioner reflective tool; and an audio recording to increase awareness and understanding of values‐based practice. In conclusion, a range of approaches may help to support patients and practitioners to make explicit what is important to them in a consultation. The next phase of our programme will use a range of methods including cluster sampling, pre‐testing and post‐testing with the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure tool, and interviews and focus groups with users and practitioners to demonstrate impact. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-09 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6900193/ /pubmed/31597223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13279 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Issues
Browne, Fiona
Bettles, Steven
Clift, Stacey
Walker, Tim
Connecting patients, practitioners, and regulators in supporting positive experiences and processes of shared decision making: A progress report
title Connecting patients, practitioners, and regulators in supporting positive experiences and processes of shared decision making: A progress report
title_full Connecting patients, practitioners, and regulators in supporting positive experiences and processes of shared decision making: A progress report
title_fullStr Connecting patients, practitioners, and regulators in supporting positive experiences and processes of shared decision making: A progress report
title_full_unstemmed Connecting patients, practitioners, and regulators in supporting positive experiences and processes of shared decision making: A progress report
title_short Connecting patients, practitioners, and regulators in supporting positive experiences and processes of shared decision making: A progress report
title_sort connecting patients, practitioners, and regulators in supporting positive experiences and processes of shared decision making: a progress report
topic Special Issues
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31597223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.13279
work_keys_str_mv AT brownefiona connectingpatientspractitionersandregulatorsinsupportingpositiveexperiencesandprocessesofshareddecisionmakingaprogressreport
AT bettlessteven connectingpatientspractitionersandregulatorsinsupportingpositiveexperiencesandprocessesofshareddecisionmakingaprogressreport
AT cliftstacey connectingpatientspractitionersandregulatorsinsupportingpositiveexperiencesandprocessesofshareddecisionmakingaprogressreport
AT walkertim connectingpatientspractitionersandregulatorsinsupportingpositiveexperiencesandprocessesofshareddecisionmakingaprogressreport