Cargando…

Modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial

PURPOSE: Clinically evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) prism and a modified surface Goldmann prism examining measurement differences correlated to central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal hysteresis (CH) values. DESIGN: Prospective,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCafferty, Sean Joseph, Tetrault, Kyle, McColgin, Ann, Chue, Warren, Levine, Jason, Muller, Melissa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30796054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313470
_version_ 1783477307742093312
author McCafferty, Sean Joseph
Tetrault, Kyle
McColgin, Ann
Chue, Warren
Levine, Jason
Muller, Melissa
author_facet McCafferty, Sean Joseph
Tetrault, Kyle
McColgin, Ann
Chue, Warren
Levine, Jason
Muller, Melissa
author_sort McCafferty, Sean Joseph
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Clinically evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) prism and a modified surface Goldmann prism examining measurement differences correlated to central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal hysteresis (CH) values. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, randomised, controlled, multicentre reference device accuracy analysis. METHODS: A GAT and a modified surface GAT prism measured IOP on 243 unique eyes. The study design and methodology complied with International Standard Organization (ISO) tonometer evaluation guidelines, except the inclusion of thin (<500 µm) and thick (>600 µm) corneas. All eyes were randomised to IOP measurement by one of five standard Goldmann prisms and five modified prisms. Pressures were measured by six investigators, two times with each prism for a total of 1936 IOP measurements. Analysis included a multiple linear regression including CCT and CH correlation. RESULTS: The difference in IOP measurements of the standard and modified Goldmann prisms correlated well to CCT particularly in thin (<500 µm) and thick (>600 µm) corneas (R(2)=0.404, p=0.007). Corneal hysteresis (CH) also significantly correlated to the difference in prism measurements (R(2)=0.125, p=0.039). There was no significant overall mean IOP bias between the two prisms (+0.43 mm Hg in modified, p=0.19). DISCUSSION: The paired IOP measurement difference between GAT and a modified surface Goldmann replacement prism indicated a statistically significant correlation to CCT and CH. A simple modified replacement prism for any Goldmann-type tonometer may significantly improve IOP measurement accuracy by minimising corneal biomechanical errors associated with CCT and CH. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02990169 and NCT02989909.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6900223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69002232019-12-23 Modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial McCafferty, Sean Joseph Tetrault, Kyle McColgin, Ann Chue, Warren Levine, Jason Muller, Melissa Br J Ophthalmol Clinical Science PURPOSE: Clinically evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) prism and a modified surface Goldmann prism examining measurement differences correlated to central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal hysteresis (CH) values. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, randomised, controlled, multicentre reference device accuracy analysis. METHODS: A GAT and a modified surface GAT prism measured IOP on 243 unique eyes. The study design and methodology complied with International Standard Organization (ISO) tonometer evaluation guidelines, except the inclusion of thin (<500 µm) and thick (>600 µm) corneas. All eyes were randomised to IOP measurement by one of five standard Goldmann prisms and five modified prisms. Pressures were measured by six investigators, two times with each prism for a total of 1936 IOP measurements. Analysis included a multiple linear regression including CCT and CH correlation. RESULTS: The difference in IOP measurements of the standard and modified Goldmann prisms correlated well to CCT particularly in thin (<500 µm) and thick (>600 µm) corneas (R(2)=0.404, p=0.007). Corneal hysteresis (CH) also significantly correlated to the difference in prism measurements (R(2)=0.125, p=0.039). There was no significant overall mean IOP bias between the two prisms (+0.43 mm Hg in modified, p=0.19). DISCUSSION: The paired IOP measurement difference between GAT and a modified surface Goldmann replacement prism indicated a statistically significant correlation to CCT and CH. A simple modified replacement prism for any Goldmann-type tonometer may significantly improve IOP measurement accuracy by minimising corneal biomechanical errors associated with CCT and CH. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02990169 and NCT02989909. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12 2019-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6900223/ /pubmed/30796054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313470 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Science
McCafferty, Sean Joseph
Tetrault, Kyle
McColgin, Ann
Chue, Warren
Levine, Jason
Muller, Melissa
Modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial
title Modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial
title_full Modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial
title_short Modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial
title_sort modified goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30796054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313470
work_keys_str_mv AT mccaffertyseanjoseph modifiedgoldmannprismintraocularpressuremeasurementaccuracyandcorrelationtocornealbiomechanicalmetricsmulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT tetraultkyle modifiedgoldmannprismintraocularpressuremeasurementaccuracyandcorrelationtocornealbiomechanicalmetricsmulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT mccolginann modifiedgoldmannprismintraocularpressuremeasurementaccuracyandcorrelationtocornealbiomechanicalmetricsmulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT chuewarren modifiedgoldmannprismintraocularpressuremeasurementaccuracyandcorrelationtocornealbiomechanicalmetricsmulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT levinejason modifiedgoldmannprismintraocularpressuremeasurementaccuracyandcorrelationtocornealbiomechanicalmetricsmulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial
AT mullermelissa modifiedgoldmannprismintraocularpressuremeasurementaccuracyandcorrelationtocornealbiomechanicalmetricsmulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrial