Walking velocity and modified rivermead mobility index as discriminatory measures for functional ambulation classification of chronic stroke patients

BACKGROUND: The cut-off values of walking velocity and classification of functional mobility both have a role in clinical settings for assessing the walking function of stroke patients and setting rehabilitation goals and treatment plans. OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated whether the cut-off values of the modified Rivermead Mobility Index (mRMI) and walking velocity accurately differentiated the walking ability of stroke patients according to the modified Functional Ambulation Category (mFAC). METHODS: Eighty two chronic stroke patients were included in the study. The comfortable/maximum walking velocities and mRMI were used to measure the mobility outcomes of these patients. To compare the walking velocities and mRMI scores for each mFAC point, one-way analysis of variance and the post-hoc test using Scheffe’s method were performed. The patients were categorized according to gait ability into either [Formula: see text] or mFAC [Formula: see text] VI group. The cut-off values for mRMI and walking velocities were calculated using a receiver-operating characteristic curve. The odds ratios of logistic regression analysis (Wald Forward) were analyzed to examine whether the cut-off values of walking velocity and mRMI can be utilized to differentiate functional walking levels. RESULTS: Except for mFACs III and IV, maximum walking velocity differed between mFAC IV and mFAC V [Formula: see text] , between mFAC V and mFAC VI [Formula: see text] , and between mFAC VI and mFAC VII [Formula: see text]. The cut-off value of mRMI is [Formula: see text] and the area under the curve is 0.87, respectively; the cut-off value for comfortable walking velocity is [Formula: see text] m/s and the area under the curve is 0.92, respectively; also, the cut-off value for maximum walking velocity is [Formula: see text] m/s and the area under the curve is 0.97, respectively. In the logistic regression analysis, the maximum walking velocity [Formula: see text] m/s, [Formula: see text] and mRMI [Formula: see text] scores, [Formula: see text] are able to distinguish [Formula: see text] from mFAC [Formula: see text] VI. CONCLUSION: The cut-off values of maximum walking velocity and mRMI are recommended as useful outcome measures for assessing ambulation levels in chronic stroke patients during rehabilitation.