Cargando…

Complex Acoustic Environments: Review, Framework, and Subjective Model

The concept of complex acoustic environments has appeared in several unrelated research areas within acoustics in different variations. Based on a review of the usage and evolution of this concept in the literature, a relevant framework was developed, which includes nine broad characteristics that a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weisser, Adam, Buchholz, Jörg M., Keidser, Gitte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31808369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519881346
_version_ 1783477392519462912
author Weisser, Adam
Buchholz, Jörg M.
Keidser, Gitte
author_facet Weisser, Adam
Buchholz, Jörg M.
Keidser, Gitte
author_sort Weisser, Adam
collection PubMed
description The concept of complex acoustic environments has appeared in several unrelated research areas within acoustics in different variations. Based on a review of the usage and evolution of this concept in the literature, a relevant framework was developed, which includes nine broad characteristics that are thought to drive the complexity of acoustic scenes. The framework was then used to study the most relevant characteristics for stimuli of realistic, everyday, acoustic scenes: multiple sources, source diversity, reverberation, and the listener’s task. The effect of these characteristics on perceived scene complexity was then evaluated in an exploratory study that reproduced the same stimuli with a three-dimensional loudspeaker array inside an anechoic chamber. Sixty-five subjects listened to the scenes and for each one had to rate 29 attributes, including complexity, both with and without target speech in the scenes. The data were analyzed using three-way principal component analysis with a (2 3 2) Tucker3 model in the dimensions of scales (or ratings), scenes, and subjects, explaining 42% of variation in the data. “Comfort” and “variability” were the dominant scale components, which span the perceived complexity. Interaction effects were observed, including the additional task of attending to target speech that shifted the complexity rating closer to the comfort scale. Also, speech contained in the background scenes introduced a second subject component, which suggests that some subjects are more distracted than others by background speech when listening to target speech. The results are interpreted in light of the proposed framework.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6900675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69006752019-12-13 Complex Acoustic Environments: Review, Framework, and Subjective Model Weisser, Adam Buchholz, Jörg M. Keidser, Gitte Trends Hear Original Article The concept of complex acoustic environments has appeared in several unrelated research areas within acoustics in different variations. Based on a review of the usage and evolution of this concept in the literature, a relevant framework was developed, which includes nine broad characteristics that are thought to drive the complexity of acoustic scenes. The framework was then used to study the most relevant characteristics for stimuli of realistic, everyday, acoustic scenes: multiple sources, source diversity, reverberation, and the listener’s task. The effect of these characteristics on perceived scene complexity was then evaluated in an exploratory study that reproduced the same stimuli with a three-dimensional loudspeaker array inside an anechoic chamber. Sixty-five subjects listened to the scenes and for each one had to rate 29 attributes, including complexity, both with and without target speech in the scenes. The data were analyzed using three-way principal component analysis with a (2 3 2) Tucker3 model in the dimensions of scales (or ratings), scenes, and subjects, explaining 42% of variation in the data. “Comfort” and “variability” were the dominant scale components, which span the perceived complexity. Interaction effects were observed, including the additional task of attending to target speech that shifted the complexity rating closer to the comfort scale. Also, speech contained in the background scenes introduced a second subject component, which suggests that some subjects are more distracted than others by background speech when listening to target speech. The results are interpreted in light of the proposed framework. SAGE Publications 2019-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6900675/ /pubmed/31808369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519881346 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Weisser, Adam
Buchholz, Jörg M.
Keidser, Gitte
Complex Acoustic Environments: Review, Framework, and Subjective Model
title Complex Acoustic Environments: Review, Framework, and Subjective Model
title_full Complex Acoustic Environments: Review, Framework, and Subjective Model
title_fullStr Complex Acoustic Environments: Review, Framework, and Subjective Model
title_full_unstemmed Complex Acoustic Environments: Review, Framework, and Subjective Model
title_short Complex Acoustic Environments: Review, Framework, and Subjective Model
title_sort complex acoustic environments: review, framework, and subjective model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31808369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519881346
work_keys_str_mv AT weisseradam complexacousticenvironmentsreviewframeworkandsubjectivemodel
AT buchholzjorgm complexacousticenvironmentsreviewframeworkandsubjectivemodel
AT keidsergitte complexacousticenvironmentsreviewframeworkandsubjectivemodel