Cargando…
Sex-based differences in the prevalence of acute mountain sickness: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: When lowlanders rapidly ascend to altitudes > 2500 m, they may develop acute mountain sickness (AMS). The individual susceptibility, ascending velocity, time spent at altitude, activity levels and altitude reached are considered risk factors for AMS. However, it is not clear whether s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31813379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-019-0228-3 |
_version_ | 1783477409421459456 |
---|---|
author | Hou, Yun-Peng Wu, Jia-Lin Tan, Chao Chen, Yu Guo, Rui Luo, Yong-Jun |
author_facet | Hou, Yun-Peng Wu, Jia-Lin Tan, Chao Chen, Yu Guo, Rui Luo, Yong-Jun |
author_sort | Hou, Yun-Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: When lowlanders rapidly ascend to altitudes > 2500 m, they may develop acute mountain sickness (AMS). The individual susceptibility, ascending velocity, time spent at altitude, activity levels and altitude reached are considered risk factors for AMS. However, it is not clear whether sex is a risk factor. The results have been inconclusive. We conducted a meta-analysis to test whether there were sex-based differences in the prevalence of AMS using Lake Louise Scoring System. METHODS: Systematic searches were performed in August 2019 in EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science for prospective studies with AMS data for men and women. The titles and abstracts were independently checked in the primary screening step, and the selected full-text articles were independently assessed in the secondary screening step by the two authors (YPH and JLW) based on pre-defined inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using by the STATA 14.1 software program. A random-effects model was employed. RESULTS: Eighteen eligible prospective studies were included. A total of 7669 participants (2639 [34.4%] women) were tested. The results showed that there was a statistically significant higher prevalence rate of AMS in women than in men (RR = 1.24, 95%CI 1.09–1.41), regardless of age or race. Howerver, the heterogeneity was significant in the analysis (Tau(2) = 0.0403, Chi(2) = 50.15, df = 17; I(2) = 66.1%, P = 0.000), it was main caused by different numbers of subjects among the studies (coefficient = − 2.17, P = 0.049). Besides, the results showed that there was no evidence of significant publication bias in the combined studies on the basis of Egger’s test (bias coefficient = 1.48, P = 0.052) and Begg’s test (P = 0.130). CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, the statistically significant finding emerging from this study was that women have a higher prevalence of AMS. However, the authors could not exclude studies where patients were on acetazolamide. Our analysis provided a direction for future studies of the relationship of sex and the risk of AMS, such as the pathological mechanism and prevention research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6900850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69008502019-12-20 Sex-based differences in the prevalence of acute mountain sickness: a meta-analysis Hou, Yun-Peng Wu, Jia-Lin Tan, Chao Chen, Yu Guo, Rui Luo, Yong-Jun Mil Med Res Review BACKGROUND: When lowlanders rapidly ascend to altitudes > 2500 m, they may develop acute mountain sickness (AMS). The individual susceptibility, ascending velocity, time spent at altitude, activity levels and altitude reached are considered risk factors for AMS. However, it is not clear whether sex is a risk factor. The results have been inconclusive. We conducted a meta-analysis to test whether there were sex-based differences in the prevalence of AMS using Lake Louise Scoring System. METHODS: Systematic searches were performed in August 2019 in EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science for prospective studies with AMS data for men and women. The titles and abstracts were independently checked in the primary screening step, and the selected full-text articles were independently assessed in the secondary screening step by the two authors (YPH and JLW) based on pre-defined inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using by the STATA 14.1 software program. A random-effects model was employed. RESULTS: Eighteen eligible prospective studies were included. A total of 7669 participants (2639 [34.4%] women) were tested. The results showed that there was a statistically significant higher prevalence rate of AMS in women than in men (RR = 1.24, 95%CI 1.09–1.41), regardless of age or race. Howerver, the heterogeneity was significant in the analysis (Tau(2) = 0.0403, Chi(2) = 50.15, df = 17; I(2) = 66.1%, P = 0.000), it was main caused by different numbers of subjects among the studies (coefficient = − 2.17, P = 0.049). Besides, the results showed that there was no evidence of significant publication bias in the combined studies on the basis of Egger’s test (bias coefficient = 1.48, P = 0.052) and Begg’s test (P = 0.130). CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, the statistically significant finding emerging from this study was that women have a higher prevalence of AMS. However, the authors could not exclude studies where patients were on acetazolamide. Our analysis provided a direction for future studies of the relationship of sex and the risk of AMS, such as the pathological mechanism and prevention research. BioMed Central 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6900850/ /pubmed/31813379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-019-0228-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Hou, Yun-Peng Wu, Jia-Lin Tan, Chao Chen, Yu Guo, Rui Luo, Yong-Jun Sex-based differences in the prevalence of acute mountain sickness: a meta-analysis |
title | Sex-based differences in the prevalence of acute mountain sickness: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Sex-based differences in the prevalence of acute mountain sickness: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Sex-based differences in the prevalence of acute mountain sickness: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex-based differences in the prevalence of acute mountain sickness: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Sex-based differences in the prevalence of acute mountain sickness: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | sex-based differences in the prevalence of acute mountain sickness: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31813379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-019-0228-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houyunpeng sexbaseddifferencesintheprevalenceofacutemountainsicknessametaanalysis AT wujialin sexbaseddifferencesintheprevalenceofacutemountainsicknessametaanalysis AT tanchao sexbaseddifferencesintheprevalenceofacutemountainsicknessametaanalysis AT chenyu sexbaseddifferencesintheprevalenceofacutemountainsicknessametaanalysis AT guorui sexbaseddifferencesintheprevalenceofacutemountainsicknessametaanalysis AT luoyongjun sexbaseddifferencesintheprevalenceofacutemountainsicknessametaanalysis |