Cargando…

A RETROSPECTIVE CASE-SERIES ON THE USE OF S53P4 BIOACTIVE GLASS FOR THE ADJUNCTIVE TREATMENT OF SEPTIC DIAPHYSEAL NON-UNION

OBJECTIVE: Non-union and persistence of infection at a fracture site for long periods are always described as a challenge to orthopedists, especially in cases of severe compound fractures with comminution and segmental bone loss. This is a case series of septic non-unions, using S53P4 bioactive glas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaiarsa, Guilherme Pelosini, dos Reis, Paulo Roberto, Kojima, Kodi Edson, Silva, Jorge Santos, Lima, Ana Lucia Lei Munhoz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6901156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31839738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220192705220540
_version_ 1783477459933462528
author Gaiarsa, Guilherme Pelosini
dos Reis, Paulo Roberto
Kojima, Kodi Edson
Silva, Jorge Santos
Lima, Ana Lucia Lei Munhoz
author_facet Gaiarsa, Guilherme Pelosini
dos Reis, Paulo Roberto
Kojima, Kodi Edson
Silva, Jorge Santos
Lima, Ana Lucia Lei Munhoz
author_sort Gaiarsa, Guilherme Pelosini
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Non-union and persistence of infection at a fracture site for long periods are always described as a challenge to orthopedists, especially in cases of severe compound fractures with comminution and segmental bone loss. This is a case series of septic non-unions, using S53P4 bioactive glass for adjunctive treatment, using internal syntheses or external fixators. The objective is to retrospectively evaluate the results of the use of S53P4 bioglass for the adjunctive treatment of septic non-unions. METHODS: We reviewed 18 patients with septic non-unions. The patients were preoperatively classified using the Non-union Scoring System (NUSS) and union outcomes were assessed by the modified radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures. Of the 18 patients treated, six underwent internal osteosynthesis and 12 were treated with external fixators in combination with bioactive glass grafting. RESULTS: The patients had a mean NUSS score of 56.6 (standard deviation of 7.6) and fracture union was achieved according to the RUST score in 17 of 18 cases (94.4%), with a mean value of 10.2 (standard deviation of 1.0). One patient was lost to follow-up. Reevaluation using the modified RUST score was 12.3 (SD = 1.0), maintaining union of 17/18. CONCLUSION: The fracture union rate was high, according to the literature, as was control of infection. Level of Evidence IV, Case series.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6901156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher ATHA EDITORA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69011562019-12-13 A RETROSPECTIVE CASE-SERIES ON THE USE OF S53P4 BIOACTIVE GLASS FOR THE ADJUNCTIVE TREATMENT OF SEPTIC DIAPHYSEAL NON-UNION Gaiarsa, Guilherme Pelosini dos Reis, Paulo Roberto Kojima, Kodi Edson Silva, Jorge Santos Lima, Ana Lucia Lei Munhoz Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: Non-union and persistence of infection at a fracture site for long periods are always described as a challenge to orthopedists, especially in cases of severe compound fractures with comminution and segmental bone loss. This is a case series of septic non-unions, using S53P4 bioactive glass for adjunctive treatment, using internal syntheses or external fixators. The objective is to retrospectively evaluate the results of the use of S53P4 bioglass for the adjunctive treatment of septic non-unions. METHODS: We reviewed 18 patients with septic non-unions. The patients were preoperatively classified using the Non-union Scoring System (NUSS) and union outcomes were assessed by the modified radiographic union scale in tibial (RUST) fractures. Of the 18 patients treated, six underwent internal osteosynthesis and 12 were treated with external fixators in combination with bioactive glass grafting. RESULTS: The patients had a mean NUSS score of 56.6 (standard deviation of 7.6) and fracture union was achieved according to the RUST score in 17 of 18 cases (94.4%), with a mean value of 10.2 (standard deviation of 1.0). One patient was lost to follow-up. Reevaluation using the modified RUST score was 12.3 (SD = 1.0), maintaining union of 17/18. CONCLUSION: The fracture union rate was high, according to the literature, as was control of infection. Level of Evidence IV, Case series. ATHA EDITORA 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6901156/ /pubmed/31839738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220192705220540 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gaiarsa, Guilherme Pelosini
dos Reis, Paulo Roberto
Kojima, Kodi Edson
Silva, Jorge Santos
Lima, Ana Lucia Lei Munhoz
A RETROSPECTIVE CASE-SERIES ON THE USE OF S53P4 BIOACTIVE GLASS FOR THE ADJUNCTIVE TREATMENT OF SEPTIC DIAPHYSEAL NON-UNION
title A RETROSPECTIVE CASE-SERIES ON THE USE OF S53P4 BIOACTIVE GLASS FOR THE ADJUNCTIVE TREATMENT OF SEPTIC DIAPHYSEAL NON-UNION
title_full A RETROSPECTIVE CASE-SERIES ON THE USE OF S53P4 BIOACTIVE GLASS FOR THE ADJUNCTIVE TREATMENT OF SEPTIC DIAPHYSEAL NON-UNION
title_fullStr A RETROSPECTIVE CASE-SERIES ON THE USE OF S53P4 BIOACTIVE GLASS FOR THE ADJUNCTIVE TREATMENT OF SEPTIC DIAPHYSEAL NON-UNION
title_full_unstemmed A RETROSPECTIVE CASE-SERIES ON THE USE OF S53P4 BIOACTIVE GLASS FOR THE ADJUNCTIVE TREATMENT OF SEPTIC DIAPHYSEAL NON-UNION
title_short A RETROSPECTIVE CASE-SERIES ON THE USE OF S53P4 BIOACTIVE GLASS FOR THE ADJUNCTIVE TREATMENT OF SEPTIC DIAPHYSEAL NON-UNION
title_sort retrospective case-series on the use of s53p4 bioactive glass for the adjunctive treatment of septic diaphyseal non-union
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6901156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31839738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220192705220540
work_keys_str_mv AT gaiarsaguilhermepelosini aretrospectivecaseseriesontheuseofs53p4bioactiveglassfortheadjunctivetreatmentofsepticdiaphysealnonunion
AT dosreispauloroberto aretrospectivecaseseriesontheuseofs53p4bioactiveglassfortheadjunctivetreatmentofsepticdiaphysealnonunion
AT kojimakodiedson aretrospectivecaseseriesontheuseofs53p4bioactiveglassfortheadjunctivetreatmentofsepticdiaphysealnonunion
AT silvajorgesantos aretrospectivecaseseriesontheuseofs53p4bioactiveglassfortheadjunctivetreatmentofsepticdiaphysealnonunion
AT limaanalucialeimunhoz aretrospectivecaseseriesontheuseofs53p4bioactiveglassfortheadjunctivetreatmentofsepticdiaphysealnonunion
AT gaiarsaguilhermepelosini retrospectivecaseseriesontheuseofs53p4bioactiveglassfortheadjunctivetreatmentofsepticdiaphysealnonunion
AT dosreispauloroberto retrospectivecaseseriesontheuseofs53p4bioactiveglassfortheadjunctivetreatmentofsepticdiaphysealnonunion
AT kojimakodiedson retrospectivecaseseriesontheuseofs53p4bioactiveglassfortheadjunctivetreatmentofsepticdiaphysealnonunion
AT silvajorgesantos retrospectivecaseseriesontheuseofs53p4bioactiveglassfortheadjunctivetreatmentofsepticdiaphysealnonunion
AT limaanalucialeimunhoz retrospectivecaseseriesontheuseofs53p4bioactiveglassfortheadjunctivetreatmentofsepticdiaphysealnonunion