Cargando…

In Vitro Activity of Essential Oils Against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

BACKGROUND: There is increasing demand for compounds to treat antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, and essential oils have gained interest. Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated antimicrobial activity of these nonpharmaceutical products. We investigated the activity of essential oils against mu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patterson, Jan E, McElmeel, Leticia, Wiederhold, Nathan P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz502
_version_ 1783477602344763392
author Patterson, Jan E
McElmeel, Leticia
Wiederhold, Nathan P
author_facet Patterson, Jan E
McElmeel, Leticia
Wiederhold, Nathan P
author_sort Patterson, Jan E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is increasing demand for compounds to treat antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, and essential oils have gained interest. Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated antimicrobial activity of these nonpharmaceutical products. We investigated the activity of essential oils against multiresistant bacteria and other clinical isolates to evaluate the potential of their use topically and/or internally for treatment of bacterial infections. METHODS: We studied the in vitro activity of 10 essential oils and 1 essential oil blend against clinical isolates including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. RESULTS: Essential oils of oregano, thyme, cinnamon bark, and lemongrass had the largest zones of inhibition against Gram-positive organisms, whereas cinnamon bark had the largest zone of inhibition against P aeruginosa. Oregano, thyme, and cinnamon bark had the largest zones of inhibition against Enterobacteriaceae. CONCLUSIONS: Essential oils have promising in vitro activity that warrants further study of their activity and use in the clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6902000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69020002019-12-16 In Vitro Activity of Essential Oils Against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Patterson, Jan E McElmeel, Leticia Wiederhold, Nathan P Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: There is increasing demand for compounds to treat antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, and essential oils have gained interest. Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated antimicrobial activity of these nonpharmaceutical products. We investigated the activity of essential oils against multiresistant bacteria and other clinical isolates to evaluate the potential of their use topically and/or internally for treatment of bacterial infections. METHODS: We studied the in vitro activity of 10 essential oils and 1 essential oil blend against clinical isolates including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. RESULTS: Essential oils of oregano, thyme, cinnamon bark, and lemongrass had the largest zones of inhibition against Gram-positive organisms, whereas cinnamon bark had the largest zone of inhibition against P aeruginosa. Oregano, thyme, and cinnamon bark had the largest zones of inhibition against Enterobacteriaceae. CONCLUSIONS: Essential oils have promising in vitro activity that warrants further study of their activity and use in the clinical setting. Oxford University Press 2019-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6902000/ /pubmed/31844638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz502 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Article
Patterson, Jan E
McElmeel, Leticia
Wiederhold, Nathan P
In Vitro Activity of Essential Oils Against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
title In Vitro Activity of Essential Oils Against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
title_full In Vitro Activity of Essential Oils Against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
title_fullStr In Vitro Activity of Essential Oils Against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Activity of Essential Oils Against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
title_short In Vitro Activity of Essential Oils Against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Clinical Isolates, Including Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
title_sort in vitro activity of essential oils against gram-positive and gram-negative clinical isolates, including carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844638
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz502
work_keys_str_mv AT pattersonjane invitroactivityofessentialoilsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativeclinicalisolatesincludingcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceae
AT mcelmeelleticia invitroactivityofessentialoilsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativeclinicalisolatesincludingcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceae
AT wiederholdnathanp invitroactivityofessentialoilsagainstgrampositiveandgramnegativeclinicalisolatesincludingcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceae