Cargando…

Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of an internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing and results service on testing uptake among young adults (16–30 years) who have never tested for STIs in London, England. METHODS: We conducted secondary analyses on data from a randomised controlled trial. In the tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Emma, Leyrat, Clémence, Baraitser, Paula, Free, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31175210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-053992
_version_ 1783477615426797568
author Wilson, Emma
Leyrat, Clémence
Baraitser, Paula
Free, Caroline
author_facet Wilson, Emma
Leyrat, Clémence
Baraitser, Paula
Free, Caroline
author_sort Wilson, Emma
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of an internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing and results service on testing uptake among young adults (16–30 years) who have never tested for STIs in London, England. METHODS: We conducted secondary analyses on data from a randomised controlled trial. In the trial, participants were randomly allocated to receive a text message with the web link of an e-STI testing and results service (intervention group) or a text message with the link of a website listing the locations, contact details and websites of seven local sexual health clinics (control group). We analysed a subsample of 528 trial participants who reported never testing for STIs at baseline. Outcomes were self-reported STI testing at 6 weeks, verified by patient record checks, and time from randomisation to completion of an STI test. RESULTS: Uptake of STI testing among ‘never testers’ almost doubled. At 6 weeks, 45.3% of the intervention completed at least one test (chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis and HIV), compared with 24.1% of the control (relative risk [RR] 1.88, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.40, p<0.001). For chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing combined, uptake was 44.3% in the intervention versus 24.1% in controls (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.36, p<0.001). The intervention reduced time to any STI test (restricted mean survival time: 29.0 days vs 36.3 days, p<0.001) at a time horizon of 42 days. CONCLUSIONS: e-STI testing increased uptake of STI testing and reduced time to test among a young population of ‘never testers’ recruited in community settings. Although encouraging, questions remain on how best to manage the additional demand generated by e-STI testing in a challenging funding environment. Larger studies are required to assess the effects later in the cascade of care, including STI diagnoses and cases treated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6902059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69020592019-12-24 Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial Wilson, Emma Leyrat, Clémence Baraitser, Paula Free, Caroline Sex Transm Infect Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of an internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing and results service on testing uptake among young adults (16–30 years) who have never tested for STIs in London, England. METHODS: We conducted secondary analyses on data from a randomised controlled trial. In the trial, participants were randomly allocated to receive a text message with the web link of an e-STI testing and results service (intervention group) or a text message with the link of a website listing the locations, contact details and websites of seven local sexual health clinics (control group). We analysed a subsample of 528 trial participants who reported never testing for STIs at baseline. Outcomes were self-reported STI testing at 6 weeks, verified by patient record checks, and time from randomisation to completion of an STI test. RESULTS: Uptake of STI testing among ‘never testers’ almost doubled. At 6 weeks, 45.3% of the intervention completed at least one test (chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis and HIV), compared with 24.1% of the control (relative risk [RR] 1.88, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.40, p<0.001). For chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing combined, uptake was 44.3% in the intervention versus 24.1% in controls (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.36, p<0.001). The intervention reduced time to any STI test (restricted mean survival time: 29.0 days vs 36.3 days, p<0.001) at a time horizon of 42 days. CONCLUSIONS: e-STI testing increased uptake of STI testing and reduced time to test among a young population of ‘never testers’ recruited in community settings. Although encouraging, questions remain on how best to manage the additional demand generated by e-STI testing in a challenging funding environment. Larger studies are required to assess the effects later in the cascade of care, including STI diagnoses and cases treated. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12 2019-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6902059/ /pubmed/31175210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-053992 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Wilson, Emma
Leyrat, Clémence
Baraitser, Paula
Free, Caroline
Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial
title Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial
title_full Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial
title_short Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial
title_sort does internet-accessed sti (e-sti) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other stis among a young population who have never tested? secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31175210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-053992
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonemma doesinternetaccessedstiestitestingincreasetestinguptakeforchlamydiaandotherstisamongayoungpopulationwhohavenevertestedsecondaryanalysesofdatafromarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT leyratclemence doesinternetaccessedstiestitestingincreasetestinguptakeforchlamydiaandotherstisamongayoungpopulationwhohavenevertestedsecondaryanalysesofdatafromarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT baraitserpaula doesinternetaccessedstiestitestingincreasetestinguptakeforchlamydiaandotherstisamongayoungpopulationwhohavenevertestedsecondaryanalysesofdatafromarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT freecaroline doesinternetaccessedstiestitestingincreasetestinguptakeforchlamydiaandotherstisamongayoungpopulationwhohavenevertestedsecondaryanalysesofdatafromarandomisedcontrolledtrial