Cargando…
Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of an internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing and results service on testing uptake among young adults (16–30 years) who have never tested for STIs in London, England. METHODS: We conducted secondary analyses on data from a randomised controlled trial. In the tr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31175210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-053992 |
_version_ | 1783477615426797568 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, Emma Leyrat, Clémence Baraitser, Paula Free, Caroline |
author_facet | Wilson, Emma Leyrat, Clémence Baraitser, Paula Free, Caroline |
author_sort | Wilson, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of an internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing and results service on testing uptake among young adults (16–30 years) who have never tested for STIs in London, England. METHODS: We conducted secondary analyses on data from a randomised controlled trial. In the trial, participants were randomly allocated to receive a text message with the web link of an e-STI testing and results service (intervention group) or a text message with the link of a website listing the locations, contact details and websites of seven local sexual health clinics (control group). We analysed a subsample of 528 trial participants who reported never testing for STIs at baseline. Outcomes were self-reported STI testing at 6 weeks, verified by patient record checks, and time from randomisation to completion of an STI test. RESULTS: Uptake of STI testing among ‘never testers’ almost doubled. At 6 weeks, 45.3% of the intervention completed at least one test (chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis and HIV), compared with 24.1% of the control (relative risk [RR] 1.88, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.40, p<0.001). For chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing combined, uptake was 44.3% in the intervention versus 24.1% in controls (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.36, p<0.001). The intervention reduced time to any STI test (restricted mean survival time: 29.0 days vs 36.3 days, p<0.001) at a time horizon of 42 days. CONCLUSIONS: e-STI testing increased uptake of STI testing and reduced time to test among a young population of ‘never testers’ recruited in community settings. Although encouraging, questions remain on how best to manage the additional demand generated by e-STI testing in a challenging funding environment. Larger studies are required to assess the effects later in the cascade of care, including STI diagnoses and cases treated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6902059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69020592019-12-24 Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial Wilson, Emma Leyrat, Clémence Baraitser, Paula Free, Caroline Sex Transm Infect Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of an internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing and results service on testing uptake among young adults (16–30 years) who have never tested for STIs in London, England. METHODS: We conducted secondary analyses on data from a randomised controlled trial. In the trial, participants were randomly allocated to receive a text message with the web link of an e-STI testing and results service (intervention group) or a text message with the link of a website listing the locations, contact details and websites of seven local sexual health clinics (control group). We analysed a subsample of 528 trial participants who reported never testing for STIs at baseline. Outcomes were self-reported STI testing at 6 weeks, verified by patient record checks, and time from randomisation to completion of an STI test. RESULTS: Uptake of STI testing among ‘never testers’ almost doubled. At 6 weeks, 45.3% of the intervention completed at least one test (chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis and HIV), compared with 24.1% of the control (relative risk [RR] 1.88, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.40, p<0.001). For chlamydia and gonorrhoea testing combined, uptake was 44.3% in the intervention versus 24.1% in controls (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.36, p<0.001). The intervention reduced time to any STI test (restricted mean survival time: 29.0 days vs 36.3 days, p<0.001) at a time horizon of 42 days. CONCLUSIONS: e-STI testing increased uptake of STI testing and reduced time to test among a young population of ‘never testers’ recruited in community settings. Although encouraging, questions remain on how best to manage the additional demand generated by e-STI testing in a challenging funding environment. Larger studies are required to assess the effects later in the cascade of care, including STI diagnoses and cases treated. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-12 2019-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6902059/ /pubmed/31175210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-053992 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Wilson, Emma Leyrat, Clémence Baraitser, Paula Free, Caroline Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial |
title | Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Does internet-accessed STI (e-STI) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other STIs among a young population who have never tested? Secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | does internet-accessed sti (e-sti) testing increase testing uptake for chlamydia and other stis among a young population who have never tested? secondary analyses of data from a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31175210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-053992 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsonemma doesinternetaccessedstiestitestingincreasetestinguptakeforchlamydiaandotherstisamongayoungpopulationwhohavenevertestedsecondaryanalysesofdatafromarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT leyratclemence doesinternetaccessedstiestitestingincreasetestinguptakeforchlamydiaandotherstisamongayoungpopulationwhohavenevertestedsecondaryanalysesofdatafromarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT baraitserpaula doesinternetaccessedstiestitestingincreasetestinguptakeforchlamydiaandotherstisamongayoungpopulationwhohavenevertestedsecondaryanalysesofdatafromarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT freecaroline doesinternetaccessedstiestitestingincreasetestinguptakeforchlamydiaandotherstisamongayoungpopulationwhohavenevertestedsecondaryanalysesofdatafromarandomisedcontrolledtrial |