Cargando…

Comparative transcriptome and histological analyses of wheat in response to phytotoxic aphid Schizaphis graminum and non-phytotoxic aphid Sitobion avenae feeding

BACKGROUND: Infestation of the phytotoxic aphid Schizaphis graminum can rapidly induce leaf chlorosis in susceptible plants, but this effect is not observed with the nonphytotoxic aphid Sitobion avenae. However, few studies have attempted to identify the different defence responses induced in wheat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yong, Fu, Yu, Fan, Jia, Li, Qian, Francis, Frédéric, Chen, Julian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2148-5
_version_ 1783477647120007168
author Zhang, Yong
Fu, Yu
Fan, Jia
Li, Qian
Francis, Frédéric
Chen, Julian
author_facet Zhang, Yong
Fu, Yu
Fan, Jia
Li, Qian
Francis, Frédéric
Chen, Julian
author_sort Zhang, Yong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Infestation of the phytotoxic aphid Schizaphis graminum can rapidly induce leaf chlorosis in susceptible plants, but this effect is not observed with the nonphytotoxic aphid Sitobion avenae. However, few studies have attempted to identify the different defence responses induced in wheat by S. graminum and S. avenae feeding and the mechanisms underlying the activation of chlorosis by S. graminum feeding. RESULTS: S. graminum feeding significantly reduced the chlorophyll content of wheat leaves, and these effects were not observed with S. avenae. A transcriptomic analysis showed that the expression levels of genes involved in the salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and ethylene signalling defence pathways were significantly upregulated by both S. avenae and S. graminum feeding; however, more plant defence genes were activated by S. graminum feeding than S. avenae feeding. The transcript levels of genes encoding cell wall-modifying proteins were significantly increased after S. graminum feeding, but only a few of these genes were induced by S. avenae. Furthermore, various reactive oxygen species-scavenging genes, such as 66 peroxidase (POD) and 8 ascorbate peroxidase (APx) genes, were significantly upregulated after S. graminum feeding, whereas only 15 POD and one APx genes were induced by S. avenae feeding. The activity of four antioxidant enzymes was also significantly upregulated by S. graminum feeding. Cytological examination showed that S. graminum feeding induced substantial hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) accumulation in wheat leaves. The chlorosis symptoms and the loss of chlorophyll observed in wheat leaves after S. graminum feeding were reduced and inhibited by the scavenging of H(2)O(2) by dimethylthiourea, which indicated that H(2)O(2) plays important role in the induction of chlorosis by S. graminum feeding. CONCLUSIONS: S. graminum and S. avenae feeding induces the JA, SA and ET signalling pathways, but S. graminum activated stronger plant defence responses than S. avenae. S. graminum feeding triggers strong ROS-scavenging activity and massive H(2)O(2) production in wheat leaves, and the accumulation of H(2)O(2) induced by S. graminum feeding is involved in the activation of chlorosis in wheat leaves. These results enhance our understanding of mechanisms underlying aphid-wheat interactions and provide clues for the development of aphid-resistant wheat varieties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6902339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69023392019-12-11 Comparative transcriptome and histological analyses of wheat in response to phytotoxic aphid Schizaphis graminum and non-phytotoxic aphid Sitobion avenae feeding Zhang, Yong Fu, Yu Fan, Jia Li, Qian Francis, Frédéric Chen, Julian BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Infestation of the phytotoxic aphid Schizaphis graminum can rapidly induce leaf chlorosis in susceptible plants, but this effect is not observed with the nonphytotoxic aphid Sitobion avenae. However, few studies have attempted to identify the different defence responses induced in wheat by S. graminum and S. avenae feeding and the mechanisms underlying the activation of chlorosis by S. graminum feeding. RESULTS: S. graminum feeding significantly reduced the chlorophyll content of wheat leaves, and these effects were not observed with S. avenae. A transcriptomic analysis showed that the expression levels of genes involved in the salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and ethylene signalling defence pathways were significantly upregulated by both S. avenae and S. graminum feeding; however, more plant defence genes were activated by S. graminum feeding than S. avenae feeding. The transcript levels of genes encoding cell wall-modifying proteins were significantly increased after S. graminum feeding, but only a few of these genes were induced by S. avenae. Furthermore, various reactive oxygen species-scavenging genes, such as 66 peroxidase (POD) and 8 ascorbate peroxidase (APx) genes, were significantly upregulated after S. graminum feeding, whereas only 15 POD and one APx genes were induced by S. avenae feeding. The activity of four antioxidant enzymes was also significantly upregulated by S. graminum feeding. Cytological examination showed that S. graminum feeding induced substantial hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) accumulation in wheat leaves. The chlorosis symptoms and the loss of chlorophyll observed in wheat leaves after S. graminum feeding were reduced and inhibited by the scavenging of H(2)O(2) by dimethylthiourea, which indicated that H(2)O(2) plays important role in the induction of chlorosis by S. graminum feeding. CONCLUSIONS: S. graminum and S. avenae feeding induces the JA, SA and ET signalling pathways, but S. graminum activated stronger plant defence responses than S. avenae. S. graminum feeding triggers strong ROS-scavenging activity and massive H(2)O(2) production in wheat leaves, and the accumulation of H(2)O(2) induced by S. graminum feeding is involved in the activation of chlorosis in wheat leaves. These results enhance our understanding of mechanisms underlying aphid-wheat interactions and provide clues for the development of aphid-resistant wheat varieties. BioMed Central 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6902339/ /pubmed/31823722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2148-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Yong
Fu, Yu
Fan, Jia
Li, Qian
Francis, Frédéric
Chen, Julian
Comparative transcriptome and histological analyses of wheat in response to phytotoxic aphid Schizaphis graminum and non-phytotoxic aphid Sitobion avenae feeding
title Comparative transcriptome and histological analyses of wheat in response to phytotoxic aphid Schizaphis graminum and non-phytotoxic aphid Sitobion avenae feeding
title_full Comparative transcriptome and histological analyses of wheat in response to phytotoxic aphid Schizaphis graminum and non-phytotoxic aphid Sitobion avenae feeding
title_fullStr Comparative transcriptome and histological analyses of wheat in response to phytotoxic aphid Schizaphis graminum and non-phytotoxic aphid Sitobion avenae feeding
title_full_unstemmed Comparative transcriptome and histological analyses of wheat in response to phytotoxic aphid Schizaphis graminum and non-phytotoxic aphid Sitobion avenae feeding
title_short Comparative transcriptome and histological analyses of wheat in response to phytotoxic aphid Schizaphis graminum and non-phytotoxic aphid Sitobion avenae feeding
title_sort comparative transcriptome and histological analyses of wheat in response to phytotoxic aphid schizaphis graminum and non-phytotoxic aphid sitobion avenae feeding
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-2148-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyong comparativetranscriptomeandhistologicalanalysesofwheatinresponsetophytotoxicaphidschizaphisgraminumandnonphytotoxicaphidsitobionavenaefeeding
AT fuyu comparativetranscriptomeandhistologicalanalysesofwheatinresponsetophytotoxicaphidschizaphisgraminumandnonphytotoxicaphidsitobionavenaefeeding
AT fanjia comparativetranscriptomeandhistologicalanalysesofwheatinresponsetophytotoxicaphidschizaphisgraminumandnonphytotoxicaphidsitobionavenaefeeding
AT liqian comparativetranscriptomeandhistologicalanalysesofwheatinresponsetophytotoxicaphidschizaphisgraminumandnonphytotoxicaphidsitobionavenaefeeding
AT francisfrederic comparativetranscriptomeandhistologicalanalysesofwheatinresponsetophytotoxicaphidschizaphisgraminumandnonphytotoxicaphidsitobionavenaefeeding
AT chenjulian comparativetranscriptomeandhistologicalanalysesofwheatinresponsetophytotoxicaphidschizaphisgraminumandnonphytotoxicaphidsitobionavenaefeeding