Cargando…

Associated factors in distinguishing patients with brucellosis from suspected cases

BACKGROUND: To investigate the risk factors for brucellosis in suspected cases of the disease. METHODS: A self-designed questionnaire was developed to collect data from 3557 people whose initial visit site was the Songyuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from January 1st, 2009 to Dec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Jingjing, Yang, Huixin, Hu, Fangfang, Zhang, Siwen, Wang, Taijun, Zhao, Qian, Wang, Ruize, Zhen, Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31818269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4662-3
_version_ 1783477672139030528
author Luo, Jingjing
Yang, Huixin
Hu, Fangfang
Zhang, Siwen
Wang, Taijun
Zhao, Qian
Wang, Ruize
Zhen, Qing
author_facet Luo, Jingjing
Yang, Huixin
Hu, Fangfang
Zhang, Siwen
Wang, Taijun
Zhao, Qian
Wang, Ruize
Zhen, Qing
author_sort Luo, Jingjing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the risk factors for brucellosis in suspected cases of the disease. METHODS: A self-designed questionnaire was developed to collect data from 3557 people whose initial visit site was the Songyuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from January 1st, 2009 to December 31st, 2012. After collecting blood samples, a plate agglutination test (PAT) and serum agglutination test (SAT) were used to distinguish the patients with brucellosis from the suspected cases. RESULTS: Sex, occupation (farmers and herdsmen), contact with abortion products, and contact with feces were the main risk factors for brucellosis in the suspected cases (all P < 0.05). No difference existed between the confirmed cases and suspected cases in the demographic characteristics, contact with animals (except swine), contact with substances, or clinical symptoms (except fever). However, the confirmed cases showed significant differences from people without brucellosis in demographic characteristics, contact with animals (except cattle and swine), contact with substances, and clinical symptoms. Suspected cases exhibited significant differences from people without brucellosis in the demographic characteristics (except education), contact with animals (except swine), contact with substances (except dust), and clinical symptoms (except chills and acratia). Brucella was cultured from the blood samples of three of 30 suspected cases with fever. Using AMOS-PCR and agarose electrophoresis, the detailed species of Brucella strain was identified as Brucella melitensis. CONCLUSIONS: Abortion products and feces are the main risk factors for brucellosis in suspected cases of the disease. Pyrexia in suspected cases with a history of contact with abortion products or feces should raise suspicion for the disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6902461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69024612019-12-11 Associated factors in distinguishing patients with brucellosis from suspected cases Luo, Jingjing Yang, Huixin Hu, Fangfang Zhang, Siwen Wang, Taijun Zhao, Qian Wang, Ruize Zhen, Qing BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: To investigate the risk factors for brucellosis in suspected cases of the disease. METHODS: A self-designed questionnaire was developed to collect data from 3557 people whose initial visit site was the Songyuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from January 1st, 2009 to December 31st, 2012. After collecting blood samples, a plate agglutination test (PAT) and serum agglutination test (SAT) were used to distinguish the patients with brucellosis from the suspected cases. RESULTS: Sex, occupation (farmers and herdsmen), contact with abortion products, and contact with feces were the main risk factors for brucellosis in the suspected cases (all P < 0.05). No difference existed between the confirmed cases and suspected cases in the demographic characteristics, contact with animals (except swine), contact with substances, or clinical symptoms (except fever). However, the confirmed cases showed significant differences from people without brucellosis in demographic characteristics, contact with animals (except cattle and swine), contact with substances, and clinical symptoms. Suspected cases exhibited significant differences from people without brucellosis in the demographic characteristics (except education), contact with animals (except swine), contact with substances (except dust), and clinical symptoms (except chills and acratia). Brucella was cultured from the blood samples of three of 30 suspected cases with fever. Using AMOS-PCR and agarose electrophoresis, the detailed species of Brucella strain was identified as Brucella melitensis. CONCLUSIONS: Abortion products and feces are the main risk factors for brucellosis in suspected cases of the disease. Pyrexia in suspected cases with a history of contact with abortion products or feces should raise suspicion for the disease. BioMed Central 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6902461/ /pubmed/31818269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4662-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Luo, Jingjing
Yang, Huixin
Hu, Fangfang
Zhang, Siwen
Wang, Taijun
Zhao, Qian
Wang, Ruize
Zhen, Qing
Associated factors in distinguishing patients with brucellosis from suspected cases
title Associated factors in distinguishing patients with brucellosis from suspected cases
title_full Associated factors in distinguishing patients with brucellosis from suspected cases
title_fullStr Associated factors in distinguishing patients with brucellosis from suspected cases
title_full_unstemmed Associated factors in distinguishing patients with brucellosis from suspected cases
title_short Associated factors in distinguishing patients with brucellosis from suspected cases
title_sort associated factors in distinguishing patients with brucellosis from suspected cases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31818269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4662-3
work_keys_str_mv AT luojingjing associatedfactorsindistinguishingpatientswithbrucellosisfromsuspectedcases
AT yanghuixin associatedfactorsindistinguishingpatientswithbrucellosisfromsuspectedcases
AT hufangfang associatedfactorsindistinguishingpatientswithbrucellosisfromsuspectedcases
AT zhangsiwen associatedfactorsindistinguishingpatientswithbrucellosisfromsuspectedcases
AT wangtaijun associatedfactorsindistinguishingpatientswithbrucellosisfromsuspectedcases
AT zhaoqian associatedfactorsindistinguishingpatientswithbrucellosisfromsuspectedcases
AT wangruize associatedfactorsindistinguishingpatientswithbrucellosisfromsuspectedcases
AT zhenqing associatedfactorsindistinguishingpatientswithbrucellosisfromsuspectedcases