Cargando…
RECIST and CHOI criteria in the evaluation of tumor response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib, a prospective multicenter study
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) at 2 months of treatment with regorafenib according to RECIST 1.1, Choi, and modified Choi (mChoi) criteria in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Baseline and 2-month contrast-enhanced computed-tomography (CECT) scans...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31818317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-019-0271-z |
_version_ | 1783477679626911744 |
---|---|
author | Lucidarme, Olivier Wagner, Mathilde Gillard, Paul Kim, Stefano Bachet, Jean-Baptiste Rousseau, Benoit Mazard, Thibault Louvet, Christophe Chibaudel, Benoist Cohen, Romain Garcia-Larnicol, Marie-Line Gobert, Aurelien Henriques, Julie André, Thierry |
author_facet | Lucidarme, Olivier Wagner, Mathilde Gillard, Paul Kim, Stefano Bachet, Jean-Baptiste Rousseau, Benoit Mazard, Thibault Louvet, Christophe Chibaudel, Benoist Cohen, Romain Garcia-Larnicol, Marie-Line Gobert, Aurelien Henriques, Julie André, Thierry |
author_sort | Lucidarme, Olivier |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) at 2 months of treatment with regorafenib according to RECIST 1.1, Choi, and modified Choi (mChoi) criteria in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Baseline and 2-month contrast-enhanced computed-tomography (CECT) scans of 55 patients with mCRC, prospectively enrolled in phase II TEXCAN trial, were centrally assessed. The primary endpoint was 2-month ORR by RECIST 1.1, Choi, and mChoi criteria. Final outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 55 patients included in this study (Intention-to-treat [ITT1] population), 35 had CECT at 2 months (ITT2 population). According to RECIST 1.1 criteria, 20 (57%) patients were SD and 15 were PD (43%) in the ITT2 population. According to Choi criteria, 18 (51%) patients were responders and 17 (48%) were non-responders. Median OS was 5.3 months (95% CI 3.7–8.6) in the ITT1 population and 8.9 months (95% CI 5.1–12.6) in the ITT2 population. In the ITT2 population, median OS was 16 months (95% CI 6.6–17.5) in SD patients (n = 20) and 4.6 months (95% CI 3.3–5.8) in PD patients (n = 15), according to RECIST 1.1 criteria (HR = 6.48). Median OS was 7.9 months (95% CI 4.2–17.5) in responders (n = 18) and 9.9 months (95% CI 3.7-NA) in non-responders (n = 17) according to Choi criteria (HR = 1.06). All patients except one were classified as non-responders with mChoi criteria. CONCLUSION: At 2 months, unlike RECIST 1.1, Choi and mChoi criteria could not identify mCRC patients with regorafenib survival benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02699073.Registered March 4, 2016, Retrospectively registered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6902493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69024932019-12-11 RECIST and CHOI criteria in the evaluation of tumor response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib, a prospective multicenter study Lucidarme, Olivier Wagner, Mathilde Gillard, Paul Kim, Stefano Bachet, Jean-Baptiste Rousseau, Benoit Mazard, Thibault Louvet, Christophe Chibaudel, Benoist Cohen, Romain Garcia-Larnicol, Marie-Line Gobert, Aurelien Henriques, Julie André, Thierry Cancer Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) at 2 months of treatment with regorafenib according to RECIST 1.1, Choi, and modified Choi (mChoi) criteria in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Baseline and 2-month contrast-enhanced computed-tomography (CECT) scans of 55 patients with mCRC, prospectively enrolled in phase II TEXCAN trial, were centrally assessed. The primary endpoint was 2-month ORR by RECIST 1.1, Choi, and mChoi criteria. Final outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 55 patients included in this study (Intention-to-treat [ITT1] population), 35 had CECT at 2 months (ITT2 population). According to RECIST 1.1 criteria, 20 (57%) patients were SD and 15 were PD (43%) in the ITT2 population. According to Choi criteria, 18 (51%) patients were responders and 17 (48%) were non-responders. Median OS was 5.3 months (95% CI 3.7–8.6) in the ITT1 population and 8.9 months (95% CI 5.1–12.6) in the ITT2 population. In the ITT2 population, median OS was 16 months (95% CI 6.6–17.5) in SD patients (n = 20) and 4.6 months (95% CI 3.3–5.8) in PD patients (n = 15), according to RECIST 1.1 criteria (HR = 6.48). Median OS was 7.9 months (95% CI 4.2–17.5) in responders (n = 18) and 9.9 months (95% CI 3.7-NA) in non-responders (n = 17) according to Choi criteria (HR = 1.06). All patients except one were classified as non-responders with mChoi criteria. CONCLUSION: At 2 months, unlike RECIST 1.1, Choi and mChoi criteria could not identify mCRC patients with regorafenib survival benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02699073.Registered March 4, 2016, Retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6902493/ /pubmed/31818317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-019-0271-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lucidarme, Olivier Wagner, Mathilde Gillard, Paul Kim, Stefano Bachet, Jean-Baptiste Rousseau, Benoit Mazard, Thibault Louvet, Christophe Chibaudel, Benoist Cohen, Romain Garcia-Larnicol, Marie-Line Gobert, Aurelien Henriques, Julie André, Thierry RECIST and CHOI criteria in the evaluation of tumor response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib, a prospective multicenter study |
title | RECIST and CHOI criteria in the evaluation of tumor response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib, a prospective multicenter study |
title_full | RECIST and CHOI criteria in the evaluation of tumor response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib, a prospective multicenter study |
title_fullStr | RECIST and CHOI criteria in the evaluation of tumor response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib, a prospective multicenter study |
title_full_unstemmed | RECIST and CHOI criteria in the evaluation of tumor response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib, a prospective multicenter study |
title_short | RECIST and CHOI criteria in the evaluation of tumor response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib, a prospective multicenter study |
title_sort | recist and choi criteria in the evaluation of tumor response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib, a prospective multicenter study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31818317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-019-0271-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lucidarmeolivier recistandchoicriteriaintheevaluationoftumorresponseinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatedwithregorafenibaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT wagnermathilde recistandchoicriteriaintheevaluationoftumorresponseinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatedwithregorafenibaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT gillardpaul recistandchoicriteriaintheevaluationoftumorresponseinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatedwithregorafenibaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT kimstefano recistandchoicriteriaintheevaluationoftumorresponseinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatedwithregorafenibaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT bachetjeanbaptiste recistandchoicriteriaintheevaluationoftumorresponseinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatedwithregorafenibaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT rousseaubenoit recistandchoicriteriaintheevaluationoftumorresponseinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatedwithregorafenibaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT mazardthibault recistandchoicriteriaintheevaluationoftumorresponseinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatedwithregorafenibaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT louvetchristophe recistandchoicriteriaintheevaluationoftumorresponseinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatedwithregorafenibaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT chibaudelbenoist recistandchoicriteriaintheevaluationoftumorresponseinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatedwithregorafenibaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT cohenromain recistandchoicriteriaintheevaluationoftumorresponseinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatedwithregorafenibaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT garcialarnicolmarieline recistandchoicriteriaintheevaluationoftumorresponseinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatedwithregorafenibaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT gobertaurelien recistandchoicriteriaintheevaluationoftumorresponseinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatedwithregorafenibaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT henriquesjulie recistandchoicriteriaintheevaluationoftumorresponseinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatedwithregorafenibaprospectivemulticenterstudy AT andrethierry recistandchoicriteriaintheevaluationoftumorresponseinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancertreatedwithregorafenibaprospectivemulticenterstudy |