Cargando…
Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
BACKGROUND: The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is used to assess functional status in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the change required for meaningful improvements remains unclear. A minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of 0.22 is frequently used in RA trials. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31867564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-019-0095-2 |
_version_ | 1783477681798512640 |
---|---|
author | Behrens, Frank Koehm, Michaela Schwaneck, Eva C. Schmalzing, Marc Gnann, Holger Greger, Gerd Tony, Hans-Peter Burkhardt, Harald |
author_facet | Behrens, Frank Koehm, Michaela Schwaneck, Eva C. Schmalzing, Marc Gnann, Holger Greger, Gerd Tony, Hans-Peter Burkhardt, Harald |
author_sort | Behrens, Frank |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is used to assess functional status in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the change required for meaningful improvements remains unclear. A minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of 0.22 is frequently used in RA trials. The aim of this study was to determine a statistically defined critical difference for HAQ-DI (HAQ-DI-d(crit)) and evaluate its association with therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from adult German patients with RA enrolled in a multicenter observational trial in which they received adalimumab therapy at the decision of the treating clinician during routine clinical care. The HAQ-DI-d(crit), defined as the minimum change that can be reliably discriminated from random long-term variations in patients on stable therapy, was determined by evaluating intra-individual variation in patient scores. Other outcomes of interest included Disease Activity Score-28 joints and patient-reported pain and fatigue. RESULTS: The HAQ-DI-d(crit) was calculated as an improvement (decrease) from baseline of 0.68 in a discovery cohort (N = 1645) of RA patients on stable therapy and with moderate disease activity (mean DAS28 [standard deviation] of 4.4 [1.6]). In the full patient cohort (N = 2740), 22.1% of patients achieved a HAQ-DI-d(crit) improvement at month 6. Compared with patients with a small improvement in HAQ-DI (decrease of ≥0.22 to < 0.68) or no improvement (< 0.22), patients achieving a HAQ-DI-d(crit) at month 6 had better therapeutic outcomes at months 12 and 24, including stable functional improvements. Change in pain was the most important predictor of HAQ-DI improvement during the first 6 months of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A HAQ-DI-d(crit) of 0.68 is a reliable measure of functional improvement. This measure may be useful in routine clinical care and clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01076205. Registered on February 26, 2010 (retrospectively registered). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6902502 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69025022019-12-20 Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Behrens, Frank Koehm, Michaela Schwaneck, Eva C. Schmalzing, Marc Gnann, Holger Greger, Gerd Tony, Hans-Peter Burkhardt, Harald BMC Rheumatol Research Article BACKGROUND: The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is used to assess functional status in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the change required for meaningful improvements remains unclear. A minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of 0.22 is frequently used in RA trials. The aim of this study was to determine a statistically defined critical difference for HAQ-DI (HAQ-DI-d(crit)) and evaluate its association with therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from adult German patients with RA enrolled in a multicenter observational trial in which they received adalimumab therapy at the decision of the treating clinician during routine clinical care. The HAQ-DI-d(crit), defined as the minimum change that can be reliably discriminated from random long-term variations in patients on stable therapy, was determined by evaluating intra-individual variation in patient scores. Other outcomes of interest included Disease Activity Score-28 joints and patient-reported pain and fatigue. RESULTS: The HAQ-DI-d(crit) was calculated as an improvement (decrease) from baseline of 0.68 in a discovery cohort (N = 1645) of RA patients on stable therapy and with moderate disease activity (mean DAS28 [standard deviation] of 4.4 [1.6]). In the full patient cohort (N = 2740), 22.1% of patients achieved a HAQ-DI-d(crit) improvement at month 6. Compared with patients with a small improvement in HAQ-DI (decrease of ≥0.22 to < 0.68) or no improvement (< 0.22), patients achieving a HAQ-DI-d(crit) at month 6 had better therapeutic outcomes at months 12 and 24, including stable functional improvements. Change in pain was the most important predictor of HAQ-DI improvement during the first 6 months of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A HAQ-DI-d(crit) of 0.68 is a reliable measure of functional improvement. This measure may be useful in routine clinical care and clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01076205. Registered on February 26, 2010 (retrospectively registered). BioMed Central 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6902502/ /pubmed/31867564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-019-0095-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Behrens, Frank Koehm, Michaela Schwaneck, Eva C. Schmalzing, Marc Gnann, Holger Greger, Gerd Tony, Hans-Peter Burkhardt, Harald Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title | Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_full | Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_fullStr | Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_short | Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_sort | use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the health assessment questionnaire-disability index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31867564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-019-0095-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT behrensfrank useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT koehmmichaela useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT schwaneckevac useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT schmalzingmarc useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT gnannholger useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT gregergerd useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT tonyhanspeter useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT burkhardtharald useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis |