Cargando…

Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND: The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is used to assess functional status in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the change required for meaningful improvements remains unclear. A minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of 0.22 is frequently used in RA trials. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Behrens, Frank, Koehm, Michaela, Schwaneck, Eva C., Schmalzing, Marc, Gnann, Holger, Greger, Gerd, Tony, Hans-Peter, Burkhardt, Harald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31867564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-019-0095-2
_version_ 1783477681798512640
author Behrens, Frank
Koehm, Michaela
Schwaneck, Eva C.
Schmalzing, Marc
Gnann, Holger
Greger, Gerd
Tony, Hans-Peter
Burkhardt, Harald
author_facet Behrens, Frank
Koehm, Michaela
Schwaneck, Eva C.
Schmalzing, Marc
Gnann, Holger
Greger, Gerd
Tony, Hans-Peter
Burkhardt, Harald
author_sort Behrens, Frank
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is used to assess functional status in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the change required for meaningful improvements remains unclear. A minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of 0.22 is frequently used in RA trials. The aim of this study was to determine a statistically defined critical difference for HAQ-DI (HAQ-DI-d(crit)) and evaluate its association with therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from adult German patients with RA enrolled in a multicenter observational trial in which they received adalimumab therapy at the decision of the treating clinician during routine clinical care. The HAQ-DI-d(crit), defined as the minimum change that can be reliably discriminated from random long-term variations in patients on stable therapy, was determined by evaluating intra-individual variation in patient scores. Other outcomes of interest included Disease Activity Score-28 joints and patient-reported pain and fatigue. RESULTS: The HAQ-DI-d(crit) was calculated as an improvement (decrease) from baseline of 0.68 in a discovery cohort (N = 1645) of RA patients on stable therapy and with moderate disease activity (mean DAS28 [standard deviation] of 4.4 [1.6]). In the full patient cohort (N = 2740), 22.1% of patients achieved a HAQ-DI-d(crit) improvement at month 6. Compared with patients with a small improvement in HAQ-DI (decrease of ≥0.22 to < 0.68) or no improvement (< 0.22), patients achieving a HAQ-DI-d(crit) at month 6 had better therapeutic outcomes at months 12 and 24, including stable functional improvements. Change in pain was the most important predictor of HAQ-DI improvement during the first 6 months of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A HAQ-DI-d(crit) of 0.68 is a reliable measure of functional improvement. This measure may be useful in routine clinical care and clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01076205. Registered on February 26, 2010 (retrospectively registered).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6902502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69025022019-12-20 Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Behrens, Frank Koehm, Michaela Schwaneck, Eva C. Schmalzing, Marc Gnann, Holger Greger, Gerd Tony, Hans-Peter Burkhardt, Harald BMC Rheumatol Research Article BACKGROUND: The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is used to assess functional status in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the change required for meaningful improvements remains unclear. A minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of 0.22 is frequently used in RA trials. The aim of this study was to determine a statistically defined critical difference for HAQ-DI (HAQ-DI-d(crit)) and evaluate its association with therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from adult German patients with RA enrolled in a multicenter observational trial in which they received adalimumab therapy at the decision of the treating clinician during routine clinical care. The HAQ-DI-d(crit), defined as the minimum change that can be reliably discriminated from random long-term variations in patients on stable therapy, was determined by evaluating intra-individual variation in patient scores. Other outcomes of interest included Disease Activity Score-28 joints and patient-reported pain and fatigue. RESULTS: The HAQ-DI-d(crit) was calculated as an improvement (decrease) from baseline of 0.68 in a discovery cohort (N = 1645) of RA patients on stable therapy and with moderate disease activity (mean DAS28 [standard deviation] of 4.4 [1.6]). In the full patient cohort (N = 2740), 22.1% of patients achieved a HAQ-DI-d(crit) improvement at month 6. Compared with patients with a small improvement in HAQ-DI (decrease of ≥0.22 to < 0.68) or no improvement (< 0.22), patients achieving a HAQ-DI-d(crit) at month 6 had better therapeutic outcomes at months 12 and 24, including stable functional improvements. Change in pain was the most important predictor of HAQ-DI improvement during the first 6 months of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A HAQ-DI-d(crit) of 0.68 is a reliable measure of functional improvement. This measure may be useful in routine clinical care and clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01076205. Registered on February 26, 2010 (retrospectively registered). BioMed Central 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6902502/ /pubmed/31867564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-019-0095-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Behrens, Frank
Koehm, Michaela
Schwaneck, Eva C.
Schmalzing, Marc
Gnann, Holger
Greger, Gerd
Tony, Hans-Peter
Burkhardt, Harald
Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_short Use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort use of a “critical difference” statistical criterion improves the predictive utility of the health assessment questionnaire-disability index score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31867564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-019-0095-2
work_keys_str_mv AT behrensfrank useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT koehmmichaela useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT schwaneckevac useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT schmalzingmarc useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT gnannholger useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT gregergerd useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT tonyhanspeter useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT burkhardtharald useofacriticaldifferencestatisticalcriterionimprovesthepredictiveutilityofthehealthassessmentquestionnairedisabilityindexscoreinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis