Cargando…
Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners
BACKGROUND: To verify the prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroid (AS) among resistance training practitioners. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional survey was performed in 100 gyms in Curitiba city, involving 5773 individuals and self-administered questionnaires. The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31818274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8004-6 |
_version_ | 1783477694851186688 |
---|---|
author | PEREIRA, Ericson MOYSES, Samuel Jorge IGNÁCIO, Sérgio Aparecido MENDES, Daniel Komarchewski SILVA, Diego Sgarbi D. A. CARNEIRO, Everdan HARDY, Ana Maria Trindade Grégio ROSA, Edvaldo Antônio Ribeiro BETTEGA, Patrícia Vida Cassi JOHANN, Aline Cristina Batista Rodrigues |
author_facet | PEREIRA, Ericson MOYSES, Samuel Jorge IGNÁCIO, Sérgio Aparecido MENDES, Daniel Komarchewski SILVA, Diego Sgarbi D. A. CARNEIRO, Everdan HARDY, Ana Maria Trindade Grégio ROSA, Edvaldo Antônio Ribeiro BETTEGA, Patrícia Vida Cassi JOHANN, Aline Cristina Batista Rodrigues |
author_sort | PEREIRA, Ericson |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To verify the prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroid (AS) among resistance training practitioners. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional survey was performed in 100 gyms in Curitiba city, involving 5773 individuals and self-administered questionnaires. The chi-square and z-tests of proportions were used for comparison between the groups (p < 0.05). RESULTS: 83.2% did not use, 9.1% formerly used, 3.4% currently used, and 4.3% intended used AS. The prevalence of former or current AS users was 16.9 and 6.5% among men and women, respectively. The prevalence ratios were as follows: 1) 2.6 male users for each woman; 2) 3.3 individuals aged 30–44 years and 2.8 individuals aged 18–29 years for each individual aged over 45 years. Beginners were not interested in using AS, but individuals who had trained longer had higher prevalence of AS use. CONCLUSIONS: The gym environment encouraged the use of AS owing to aesthetic appeal. Thus, suggesting the need for actions to prevent abusive use of AS considering the practitioners profile (practitioners were young, university and single). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6902556 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69025562019-12-11 Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners PEREIRA, Ericson MOYSES, Samuel Jorge IGNÁCIO, Sérgio Aparecido MENDES, Daniel Komarchewski SILVA, Diego Sgarbi D. A. CARNEIRO, Everdan HARDY, Ana Maria Trindade Grégio ROSA, Edvaldo Antônio Ribeiro BETTEGA, Patrícia Vida Cassi JOHANN, Aline Cristina Batista Rodrigues BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: To verify the prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroid (AS) among resistance training practitioners. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional survey was performed in 100 gyms in Curitiba city, involving 5773 individuals and self-administered questionnaires. The chi-square and z-tests of proportions were used for comparison between the groups (p < 0.05). RESULTS: 83.2% did not use, 9.1% formerly used, 3.4% currently used, and 4.3% intended used AS. The prevalence of former or current AS users was 16.9 and 6.5% among men and women, respectively. The prevalence ratios were as follows: 1) 2.6 male users for each woman; 2) 3.3 individuals aged 30–44 years and 2.8 individuals aged 18–29 years for each individual aged over 45 years. Beginners were not interested in using AS, but individuals who had trained longer had higher prevalence of AS use. CONCLUSIONS: The gym environment encouraged the use of AS owing to aesthetic appeal. Thus, suggesting the need for actions to prevent abusive use of AS considering the practitioners profile (practitioners were young, university and single). BioMed Central 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6902556/ /pubmed/31818274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8004-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article PEREIRA, Ericson MOYSES, Samuel Jorge IGNÁCIO, Sérgio Aparecido MENDES, Daniel Komarchewski SILVA, Diego Sgarbi D. A. CARNEIRO, Everdan HARDY, Ana Maria Trindade Grégio ROSA, Edvaldo Antônio Ribeiro BETTEGA, Patrícia Vida Cassi JOHANN, Aline Cristina Batista Rodrigues Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners |
title | Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners |
title_full | Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners |
title_fullStr | Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners |
title_short | Prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners |
title_sort | prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroids among resistance training practitioners |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31818274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8004-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereiraericson prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners AT moysessamueljorge prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners AT ignaciosergioaparecido prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners AT mendesdanielkomarchewski prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners AT silvadiegosgarbida prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners AT carneiroeverdan prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners AT hardyanamariatrindadegregio prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners AT rosaedvaldoantonioribeiro prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners AT bettegapatriciavidacassi prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners AT johannalinecristinabatistarodrigues prevalenceandprofileofusersandnonusersofanabolicsteroidsamongresistancetrainingpractitioners |