Cargando…

Appropriateness of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices in Australia

IMPORTANCE: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is a common indication for antibiotic use in hospitals and is associated with high rates of inappropriateness. OBJECTIVE: To describe the SAP prescribing practices and assess hospital, surgical, and patient factors associated with appropriate SAP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ierano, Courtney, Thursky, Karin, Marshall, Caroline, Koning, Sonia, James, Rod, Johnson, Sandra, Imam, Nabeel, Worth, Leon J., Peel, Trisha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31702804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15003
_version_ 1783477733806833664
author Ierano, Courtney
Thursky, Karin
Marshall, Caroline
Koning, Sonia
James, Rod
Johnson, Sandra
Imam, Nabeel
Worth, Leon J.
Peel, Trisha
author_facet Ierano, Courtney
Thursky, Karin
Marshall, Caroline
Koning, Sonia
James, Rod
Johnson, Sandra
Imam, Nabeel
Worth, Leon J.
Peel, Trisha
author_sort Ierano, Courtney
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is a common indication for antibiotic use in hospitals and is associated with high rates of inappropriateness. OBJECTIVE: To describe the SAP prescribing practices and assess hospital, surgical, and patient factors associated with appropriate SAP prescribing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, national, quality improvement study with retrospective analysis of data collected from Australian hospitals via Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey audits from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2018. Data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Crude estimates of appropriateness were adjusted for factors included in the model by calculating estimated marginal means and presented as adjusted-appropriateness with 95% confidence intervals. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Adjusted appropriateness and factors associated with inappropriate prescriptions. RESULTS: A total of 9351 surgical episodes and 15 395 prescriptions (10 740 procedural and 4655 postprocedural) were analyzed. Crude appropriateness of total prescriptions was 48.7% (7492 prescriptions). The adjusted appropriateness of each surgical procedure group was low for procedural SAP, ranging from 33.7% (95% CI, 26.3%-41.2%) for dentoalveolar surgery to 68.9% (95% CI, 63.2%-74.5%) for neurosurgery. The adjusted appropriateness of postprocedural prescriptions was also low, ranging from 21.5% (95% CI, 13.4%-29.7%) for breast surgery to 58.7% (95% CI, 47.9%-69.4%) for ophthalmological procedures. The most common reason for inappropriate procedural SAP was incorrect timing (44.9%), while duration greater than 24 hours was the most common reason for inappropriate postprocedural SAP (54.3%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: High rates of inappropriate procedural and postprocedural antimicrobial use were demonstrated across all surgical specialties. Reasons for inappropriateness, such as timing and duration, varied according to the type of SAP and surgical specialty. These findings highlight the need for improvement in SAP prescribing and suggest potential targeted areas for action.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6902799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69027992019-12-24 Appropriateness of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices in Australia Ierano, Courtney Thursky, Karin Marshall, Caroline Koning, Sonia James, Rod Johnson, Sandra Imam, Nabeel Worth, Leon J. Peel, Trisha JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is a common indication for antibiotic use in hospitals and is associated with high rates of inappropriateness. OBJECTIVE: To describe the SAP prescribing practices and assess hospital, surgical, and patient factors associated with appropriate SAP prescribing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, national, quality improvement study with retrospective analysis of data collected from Australian hospitals via Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey audits from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2018. Data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Crude estimates of appropriateness were adjusted for factors included in the model by calculating estimated marginal means and presented as adjusted-appropriateness with 95% confidence intervals. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Adjusted appropriateness and factors associated with inappropriate prescriptions. RESULTS: A total of 9351 surgical episodes and 15 395 prescriptions (10 740 procedural and 4655 postprocedural) were analyzed. Crude appropriateness of total prescriptions was 48.7% (7492 prescriptions). The adjusted appropriateness of each surgical procedure group was low for procedural SAP, ranging from 33.7% (95% CI, 26.3%-41.2%) for dentoalveolar surgery to 68.9% (95% CI, 63.2%-74.5%) for neurosurgery. The adjusted appropriateness of postprocedural prescriptions was also low, ranging from 21.5% (95% CI, 13.4%-29.7%) for breast surgery to 58.7% (95% CI, 47.9%-69.4%) for ophthalmological procedures. The most common reason for inappropriate procedural SAP was incorrect timing (44.9%), while duration greater than 24 hours was the most common reason for inappropriate postprocedural SAP (54.3%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: High rates of inappropriate procedural and postprocedural antimicrobial use were demonstrated across all surgical specialties. Reasons for inappropriateness, such as timing and duration, varied according to the type of SAP and surgical specialty. These findings highlight the need for improvement in SAP prescribing and suggest potential targeted areas for action. American Medical Association 2019-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6902799/ /pubmed/31702804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15003 Text en Copyright 2019 Ierano C et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Ierano, Courtney
Thursky, Karin
Marshall, Caroline
Koning, Sonia
James, Rod
Johnson, Sandra
Imam, Nabeel
Worth, Leon J.
Peel, Trisha
Appropriateness of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices in Australia
title Appropriateness of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices in Australia
title_full Appropriateness of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices in Australia
title_fullStr Appropriateness of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Appropriateness of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices in Australia
title_short Appropriateness of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices in Australia
title_sort appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis practices in australia
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6902799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31702804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15003
work_keys_str_mv AT ieranocourtney appropriatenessofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticesinaustralia
AT thurskykarin appropriatenessofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticesinaustralia
AT marshallcaroline appropriatenessofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticesinaustralia
AT koningsonia appropriatenessofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticesinaustralia
AT jamesrod appropriatenessofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticesinaustralia
AT johnsonsandra appropriatenessofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticesinaustralia
AT imamnabeel appropriatenessofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticesinaustralia
AT worthleonj appropriatenessofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticesinaustralia
AT peeltrisha appropriatenessofsurgicalantimicrobialprophylaxispracticesinaustralia