Cargando…

Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population

We set out to evaluate the performance of a multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) in an average-risk colonoscopy-controlled colorectal cancer (CRC) screening population. MT-sDNA stool test results were evaluated against fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results for the detection of different lesions, includ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosch, L.J.W., Melotte, V., Mongera, S., Daenen, K.L.J., Coupé, V.M.H., van Turenhout, S.T., Stoop, E.M., de Wijkerslooth, T.R., Mulder, C.J.J., Rausch, C., Kuipers, E.J., Dekker, E., Domanico, M.J., Lidgard, G.P., Berger, B.M., van Engeland, M., Carvalho, B., Meijer, G.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6903367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31764091
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000445
_version_ 1783477840794091520
author Bosch, L.J.W.
Melotte, V.
Mongera, S.
Daenen, K.L.J.
Coupé, V.M.H.
van Turenhout, S.T.
Stoop, E.M.
de Wijkerslooth, T.R.
Mulder, C.J.J.
Rausch, C.
Kuipers, E.J.
Dekker, E.
Domanico, M.J.
Lidgard, G.P.
Berger, B.M.
van Engeland, M.
Carvalho, B.
Meijer, G.A.
author_facet Bosch, L.J.W.
Melotte, V.
Mongera, S.
Daenen, K.L.J.
Coupé, V.M.H.
van Turenhout, S.T.
Stoop, E.M.
de Wijkerslooth, T.R.
Mulder, C.J.J.
Rausch, C.
Kuipers, E.J.
Dekker, E.
Domanico, M.J.
Lidgard, G.P.
Berger, B.M.
van Engeland, M.
Carvalho, B.
Meijer, G.A.
author_sort Bosch, L.J.W.
collection PubMed
description We set out to evaluate the performance of a multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) in an average-risk colonoscopy-controlled colorectal cancer (CRC) screening population. MT-sDNA stool test results were evaluated against fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results for the detection of different lesions, including molecularly defined high-risk adenomas and several other tumor characteristics. METHODS: Whole stool samples (n = 1,047) were prospectively collected and subjected to an MT-sDNA test, which tests for KRAS mutations, NDRG4 and BMP3 promoter methylation, and hemoglobin. Results for detecting CRC (n = 7), advanced precancerous lesions (advanced adenoma [AA] and advanced serrated polyps; n = 119), and non-AAs (n = 191) were compared with those of FIT alone (thresholds of 50, 75, and 100 hemoglobin/mL). AAs with high risk of progression were defined by the presence of specific DNA copy number events as measured by low-pass whole genome sequencing. RESULTS: The MT-sDNA test was more sensitive than FIT alone in detecting advanced precancerous lesions (46% (55/119) vs 27% (32/119), respectively, P < 0.001). Specificities among individuals with nonadvanced or negative findings (controls) were 89% (791/888) and 93% (828/888) for MT-sDNA and FIT testing, respectively. A positive MT-sDNA test was associated with multiple lesions (P = 0.005), larger lesions (P = 0.03), and lesions with tubulovillous architecture (P = 0.04). The sensitivity of the MT-sDNA test or FIT in detecting individuals with high-risk AAs (n = 19) from individuals with low-risk AAs (n = 52) was not significantly different. DISCUSSION: In an average-risk screening population, the MT-sDNA test has an increased sensitivity for detecting advanced precancerous lesions compared with FIT alone. AAs with a high risk of progression were not detected with significantly higher sensitivity by MT-sDNA or FIT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6903367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69033672020-01-22 Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population Bosch, L.J.W. Melotte, V. Mongera, S. Daenen, K.L.J. Coupé, V.M.H. van Turenhout, S.T. Stoop, E.M. de Wijkerslooth, T.R. Mulder, C.J.J. Rausch, C. Kuipers, E.J. Dekker, E. Domanico, M.J. Lidgard, G.P. Berger, B.M. van Engeland, M. Carvalho, B. Meijer, G.A. Am J Gastroenterol Article We set out to evaluate the performance of a multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) in an average-risk colonoscopy-controlled colorectal cancer (CRC) screening population. MT-sDNA stool test results were evaluated against fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results for the detection of different lesions, including molecularly defined high-risk adenomas and several other tumor characteristics. METHODS: Whole stool samples (n = 1,047) were prospectively collected and subjected to an MT-sDNA test, which tests for KRAS mutations, NDRG4 and BMP3 promoter methylation, and hemoglobin. Results for detecting CRC (n = 7), advanced precancerous lesions (advanced adenoma [AA] and advanced serrated polyps; n = 119), and non-AAs (n = 191) were compared with those of FIT alone (thresholds of 50, 75, and 100 hemoglobin/mL). AAs with high risk of progression were defined by the presence of specific DNA copy number events as measured by low-pass whole genome sequencing. RESULTS: The MT-sDNA test was more sensitive than FIT alone in detecting advanced precancerous lesions (46% (55/119) vs 27% (32/119), respectively, P < 0.001). Specificities among individuals with nonadvanced or negative findings (controls) were 89% (791/888) and 93% (828/888) for MT-sDNA and FIT testing, respectively. A positive MT-sDNA test was associated with multiple lesions (P = 0.005), larger lesions (P = 0.03), and lesions with tubulovillous architecture (P = 0.04). The sensitivity of the MT-sDNA test or FIT in detecting individuals with high-risk AAs (n = 19) from individuals with low-risk AAs (n = 52) was not significantly different. DISCUSSION: In an average-risk screening population, the MT-sDNA test has an increased sensitivity for detecting advanced precancerous lesions compared with FIT alone. AAs with a high risk of progression were not detected with significantly higher sensitivity by MT-sDNA or FIT. Wolters Kluwer 2019-12 2019-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6903367/ /pubmed/31764091 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000445 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Bosch, L.J.W.
Melotte, V.
Mongera, S.
Daenen, K.L.J.
Coupé, V.M.H.
van Turenhout, S.T.
Stoop, E.M.
de Wijkerslooth, T.R.
Mulder, C.J.J.
Rausch, C.
Kuipers, E.J.
Dekker, E.
Domanico, M.J.
Lidgard, G.P.
Berger, B.M.
van Engeland, M.
Carvalho, B.
Meijer, G.A.
Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population
title Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population
title_full Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population
title_fullStr Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population
title_full_unstemmed Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population
title_short Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population
title_sort multitarget stool dna test performance in an average-risk colorectal cancer screening population
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6903367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31764091
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000445
work_keys_str_mv AT boschljw multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT melottev multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT mongeras multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT daenenklj multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT coupevmh multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT vanturenhoutst multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT stoopem multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT dewijkersloothtr multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT muldercjj multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT rauschc multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT kuipersej multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT dekkere multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT domanicomj multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT lidgardgp multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT bergerbm multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT vanengelandm multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT carvalhob multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT meijerga multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation