Cargando…
Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population
We set out to evaluate the performance of a multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) in an average-risk colonoscopy-controlled colorectal cancer (CRC) screening population. MT-sDNA stool test results were evaluated against fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results for the detection of different lesions, includ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6903367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31764091 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000445 |
_version_ | 1783477840794091520 |
---|---|
author | Bosch, L.J.W. Melotte, V. Mongera, S. Daenen, K.L.J. Coupé, V.M.H. van Turenhout, S.T. Stoop, E.M. de Wijkerslooth, T.R. Mulder, C.J.J. Rausch, C. Kuipers, E.J. Dekker, E. Domanico, M.J. Lidgard, G.P. Berger, B.M. van Engeland, M. Carvalho, B. Meijer, G.A. |
author_facet | Bosch, L.J.W. Melotte, V. Mongera, S. Daenen, K.L.J. Coupé, V.M.H. van Turenhout, S.T. Stoop, E.M. de Wijkerslooth, T.R. Mulder, C.J.J. Rausch, C. Kuipers, E.J. Dekker, E. Domanico, M.J. Lidgard, G.P. Berger, B.M. van Engeland, M. Carvalho, B. Meijer, G.A. |
author_sort | Bosch, L.J.W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We set out to evaluate the performance of a multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) in an average-risk colonoscopy-controlled colorectal cancer (CRC) screening population. MT-sDNA stool test results were evaluated against fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results for the detection of different lesions, including molecularly defined high-risk adenomas and several other tumor characteristics. METHODS: Whole stool samples (n = 1,047) were prospectively collected and subjected to an MT-sDNA test, which tests for KRAS mutations, NDRG4 and BMP3 promoter methylation, and hemoglobin. Results for detecting CRC (n = 7), advanced precancerous lesions (advanced adenoma [AA] and advanced serrated polyps; n = 119), and non-AAs (n = 191) were compared with those of FIT alone (thresholds of 50, 75, and 100 hemoglobin/mL). AAs with high risk of progression were defined by the presence of specific DNA copy number events as measured by low-pass whole genome sequencing. RESULTS: The MT-sDNA test was more sensitive than FIT alone in detecting advanced precancerous lesions (46% (55/119) vs 27% (32/119), respectively, P < 0.001). Specificities among individuals with nonadvanced or negative findings (controls) were 89% (791/888) and 93% (828/888) for MT-sDNA and FIT testing, respectively. A positive MT-sDNA test was associated with multiple lesions (P = 0.005), larger lesions (P = 0.03), and lesions with tubulovillous architecture (P = 0.04). The sensitivity of the MT-sDNA test or FIT in detecting individuals with high-risk AAs (n = 19) from individuals with low-risk AAs (n = 52) was not significantly different. DISCUSSION: In an average-risk screening population, the MT-sDNA test has an increased sensitivity for detecting advanced precancerous lesions compared with FIT alone. AAs with a high risk of progression were not detected with significantly higher sensitivity by MT-sDNA or FIT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6903367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69033672020-01-22 Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population Bosch, L.J.W. Melotte, V. Mongera, S. Daenen, K.L.J. Coupé, V.M.H. van Turenhout, S.T. Stoop, E.M. de Wijkerslooth, T.R. Mulder, C.J.J. Rausch, C. Kuipers, E.J. Dekker, E. Domanico, M.J. Lidgard, G.P. Berger, B.M. van Engeland, M. Carvalho, B. Meijer, G.A. Am J Gastroenterol Article We set out to evaluate the performance of a multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) in an average-risk colonoscopy-controlled colorectal cancer (CRC) screening population. MT-sDNA stool test results were evaluated against fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results for the detection of different lesions, including molecularly defined high-risk adenomas and several other tumor characteristics. METHODS: Whole stool samples (n = 1,047) were prospectively collected and subjected to an MT-sDNA test, which tests for KRAS mutations, NDRG4 and BMP3 promoter methylation, and hemoglobin. Results for detecting CRC (n = 7), advanced precancerous lesions (advanced adenoma [AA] and advanced serrated polyps; n = 119), and non-AAs (n = 191) were compared with those of FIT alone (thresholds of 50, 75, and 100 hemoglobin/mL). AAs with high risk of progression were defined by the presence of specific DNA copy number events as measured by low-pass whole genome sequencing. RESULTS: The MT-sDNA test was more sensitive than FIT alone in detecting advanced precancerous lesions (46% (55/119) vs 27% (32/119), respectively, P < 0.001). Specificities among individuals with nonadvanced or negative findings (controls) were 89% (791/888) and 93% (828/888) for MT-sDNA and FIT testing, respectively. A positive MT-sDNA test was associated with multiple lesions (P = 0.005), larger lesions (P = 0.03), and lesions with tubulovillous architecture (P = 0.04). The sensitivity of the MT-sDNA test or FIT in detecting individuals with high-risk AAs (n = 19) from individuals with low-risk AAs (n = 52) was not significantly different. DISCUSSION: In an average-risk screening population, the MT-sDNA test has an increased sensitivity for detecting advanced precancerous lesions compared with FIT alone. AAs with a high risk of progression were not detected with significantly higher sensitivity by MT-sDNA or FIT. Wolters Kluwer 2019-12 2019-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6903367/ /pubmed/31764091 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000445 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Article Bosch, L.J.W. Melotte, V. Mongera, S. Daenen, K.L.J. Coupé, V.M.H. van Turenhout, S.T. Stoop, E.M. de Wijkerslooth, T.R. Mulder, C.J.J. Rausch, C. Kuipers, E.J. Dekker, E. Domanico, M.J. Lidgard, G.P. Berger, B.M. van Engeland, M. Carvalho, B. Meijer, G.A. Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population |
title | Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population |
title_full | Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population |
title_fullStr | Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population |
title_full_unstemmed | Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population |
title_short | Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population |
title_sort | multitarget stool dna test performance in an average-risk colorectal cancer screening population |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6903367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31764091 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000445 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boschljw multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT melottev multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT mongeras multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT daenenklj multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT coupevmh multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT vanturenhoutst multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT stoopem multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT dewijkersloothtr multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT muldercjj multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT rauschc multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT kuipersej multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT dekkere multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT domanicomj multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT lidgardgp multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT bergerbm multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT vanengelandm multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT carvalhob multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT meijerga multitargetstooldnatestperformanceinanaverageriskcolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation |