Cargando…

Multiple Cultures and Extended Incubation for Upper Extremity Revision Arthroplasty Affect Clinical Care: A Cohort Study

Skin flora organisms (SFOs) isolated from 1 to 2 tissue samples during shoulder and elbow revision arthroplasty are difficult to distinguish as contamination or infection. We examined the change in clinical care after implementation of an Arthroplasty Infection Protocol by increasing the number of i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahylis, Jared, DeHaan, Alexander, Domont, Zachary B., Thompson, Austin R., Orfaly, Robert M., Barnes, Penelope, Mirarchi, Adam J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6903814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31875193
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-19-00150
_version_ 1783477915056340992
author Mahylis, Jared
DeHaan, Alexander
Domont, Zachary B.
Thompson, Austin R.
Orfaly, Robert M.
Barnes, Penelope
Mirarchi, Adam J.
author_facet Mahylis, Jared
DeHaan, Alexander
Domont, Zachary B.
Thompson, Austin R.
Orfaly, Robert M.
Barnes, Penelope
Mirarchi, Adam J.
author_sort Mahylis, Jared
collection PubMed
description Skin flora organisms (SFOs) isolated from 1 to 2 tissue samples during shoulder and elbow revision arthroplasty are difficult to distinguish as contamination or infection. We examined the change in clinical care after implementation of an Arthroplasty Infection Protocol by increasing the number of intraoperative samples held for 10-day incubation to a minimum of 5. METHODS: Infection was defined as ≥3 cultures growing the same SFO or any one culture growing any other virulent organism. SFOs growing in 1 to 2 samples were defined as skin flora contaminant. All cases were compared with pre–Arthroplasty Infection Protocol institution standard to determine changes in microbiological diagnosis and resultant antibiotic treatment. RESULTS: Forty cases fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 50% of these were culture negative, and 35% grew Propionibacteria. When compared with the standard of obtaining one sample, this protocol altered the microbiological diagnosis and subsequent antibiotic treatment in 45% of cases (95% confidence interval 29% to 62%). This protocol had a predictive value of joint sterility in 95% of culture-negative cases (95% confidence interval 74% to 99%). DISCUSSION: The addition of 5 or more samples held for 10-day incubation reliably differentiated between joint infection, contamination, and sterility, which changed the course of care in 45% of surgical cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6903814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69038142019-12-24 Multiple Cultures and Extended Incubation for Upper Extremity Revision Arthroplasty Affect Clinical Care: A Cohort Study Mahylis, Jared DeHaan, Alexander Domont, Zachary B. Thompson, Austin R. Orfaly, Robert M. Barnes, Penelope Mirarchi, Adam J. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article Skin flora organisms (SFOs) isolated from 1 to 2 tissue samples during shoulder and elbow revision arthroplasty are difficult to distinguish as contamination or infection. We examined the change in clinical care after implementation of an Arthroplasty Infection Protocol by increasing the number of intraoperative samples held for 10-day incubation to a minimum of 5. METHODS: Infection was defined as ≥3 cultures growing the same SFO or any one culture growing any other virulent organism. SFOs growing in 1 to 2 samples were defined as skin flora contaminant. All cases were compared with pre–Arthroplasty Infection Protocol institution standard to determine changes in microbiological diagnosis and resultant antibiotic treatment. RESULTS: Forty cases fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 50% of these were culture negative, and 35% grew Propionibacteria. When compared with the standard of obtaining one sample, this protocol altered the microbiological diagnosis and subsequent antibiotic treatment in 45% of cases (95% confidence interval 29% to 62%). This protocol had a predictive value of joint sterility in 95% of culture-negative cases (95% confidence interval 74% to 99%). DISCUSSION: The addition of 5 or more samples held for 10-day incubation reliably differentiated between joint infection, contamination, and sterility, which changed the course of care in 45% of surgical cases. Wolters Kluwer 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6903814/ /pubmed/31875193 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-19-00150 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mahylis, Jared
DeHaan, Alexander
Domont, Zachary B.
Thompson, Austin R.
Orfaly, Robert M.
Barnes, Penelope
Mirarchi, Adam J.
Multiple Cultures and Extended Incubation for Upper Extremity Revision Arthroplasty Affect Clinical Care: A Cohort Study
title Multiple Cultures and Extended Incubation for Upper Extremity Revision Arthroplasty Affect Clinical Care: A Cohort Study
title_full Multiple Cultures and Extended Incubation for Upper Extremity Revision Arthroplasty Affect Clinical Care: A Cohort Study
title_fullStr Multiple Cultures and Extended Incubation for Upper Extremity Revision Arthroplasty Affect Clinical Care: A Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Multiple Cultures and Extended Incubation for Upper Extremity Revision Arthroplasty Affect Clinical Care: A Cohort Study
title_short Multiple Cultures and Extended Incubation for Upper Extremity Revision Arthroplasty Affect Clinical Care: A Cohort Study
title_sort multiple cultures and extended incubation for upper extremity revision arthroplasty affect clinical care: a cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6903814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31875193
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-19-00150
work_keys_str_mv AT mahylisjared multipleculturesandextendedincubationforupperextremityrevisionarthroplastyaffectclinicalcareacohortstudy
AT dehaanalexander multipleculturesandextendedincubationforupperextremityrevisionarthroplastyaffectclinicalcareacohortstudy
AT domontzacharyb multipleculturesandextendedincubationforupperextremityrevisionarthroplastyaffectclinicalcareacohortstudy
AT thompsonaustinr multipleculturesandextendedincubationforupperextremityrevisionarthroplastyaffectclinicalcareacohortstudy
AT orfalyrobertm multipleculturesandextendedincubationforupperextremityrevisionarthroplastyaffectclinicalcareacohortstudy
AT barnespenelope multipleculturesandextendedincubationforupperextremityrevisionarthroplastyaffectclinicalcareacohortstudy
AT mirarchiadamj multipleculturesandextendedincubationforupperextremityrevisionarthroplastyaffectclinicalcareacohortstudy